Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Battle New
VS
Home
AH
Away
Over
O/U
Under
More Matches
Member Ranking
-
1
4
Janan💚Won 8/8Follow100%Win Rate +80%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
1
Mbah_tipsterWon 4/4Follow85%Win Rate +52.7%ROI 20Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
2
WissywaxplanetWon 10/12Follow83.3%Win Rate +15%ROI 12Tips 1.38Avg Odds -
4
Angela MurphyWon 14/15Follow82.4%Win Rate +48%ROI 19Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
5
Darren (Hispanospherical)Won 8/13Follow81.3%Win Rate +43.7%ROI 51Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
6
1
Ayomide ilesanmiWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +39.8%ROI 10Tips 1.85Avg Odds
4
1
2
1
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Soccer Som Won 12/17Drawing on in-depth match data to deliver sharp, professional analysis, I break down this Premier League fixture. Tottenham holds a clear edge in finishing efficiency, with an 18.3% conversion rate compared to Manchester United's 14.7%. Their expected goals per game stands at 1.82, well above United's 1.45, which proves they generate far more high-value scoring threats. While Manchester United records a better key pass success rate at 62% versus Tottenham's 55%, Tottenham's progressive pass value in the final third hits 1.32, outperforming United's 0.98. United averages 58% possession per game to dominate ball retention, but Tottenham boasts a much faster transition speed at 1.2 seconds against United's 1.4. Though United's total team running distance reaches 118km, 1.2km more than Tottenham, Tottenham registers far more high-intensity sprints (14 per game to United's 9), giving them a distinct upper hand in counterattack threat.AH
ENG PR
Manchester United
-
Tottenham Hotspur
48 -
Adin ReportsOffensive efficiency metrics clearly separate these two Premier League sides. Manchester United hold a clear edge over Tottenham in finishing conversion rate, hitting 18.3% compared to Spurs' 14.7%, while their xG per attack stands at 1.24 against Tottenham's 0.98, making their attacking output far more threatening. Their 62% success rate on key passes and 3.8 value rating for final-third passes also outperform Tottenham's, pointing to far stronger midfield control. Their 1.2-second transition speed is also faster than Spurs' 1.4 seconds, letting them launch quick attacks far more smoothly. United also log a higher total match running distance at 112km and 14 high-intensity sprints than their opponents, showing obvious physical advantages. While Tottenham posts slightly better numbers on tackles (12) and interceptions (9) at the defensive end, their total clearances of 5 are far lower than United's 8, leaving obvious gaps in their last line of defense. The stark contrast in attacking cO/UENG PR
Manchester United
-
Tottenham Hotspur
-
nao me sinto mal maisCurrently sitting 12th in the Premier League, Manchester United have only secured one win through their first five league fixtures, while Tottenham sit rock bottom without a single win across their opening five matches. Tottenham are far more desperate to claim their first three points to ease their sharp points pressure, while United’s current ranking brings far less urgent anxiety. Their head-to-head records across the past five years see Tottenham claim more wins than losses, and this historical edge could help soften their current form-related stress. Both sides hold nearly identical overall records across their last 10 outings, with 2 wins, 4 draws and 4 losses apiece, meaning neither side is in stable form, though Tottenham’s recent league run is noticeably more underwhelming. United’s system relies on possession, short passing, wide crosses and long-range efforts, with their main flaws being poor finishing and a high frequency of being caught offside. Tottenham also prioriAHENG PR
Manchester United
-
Tottenham Hotspur
ENG PR
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post