Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
TopnotchWon 16/18Follow88.9%Win Rate +43.6%ROI 18Tips 1.60Avg Odds -
2
RossyGWon 17/20Follow85%Win Rate +36.2%ROI 20Tips 1.58Avg Odds -
3
ThatMadridGuyFollow83.3%Win Rate +48.7%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
JJ LauFollow83.3%Win Rate +36.3%ROI 12Tips 1.61Avg Odds -
5
Dirty Dirty DiamondWon 10/12Follow80%Win Rate +49.4%ROI 15Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
AI Soccer PredictorWon 7/8Follow76.5%Win Rate +46.1%ROI 22Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
LMLMLM10The Chicago Fire and the New England Revolution have a long - standing history of encounters in the MLS. Their past meetings have always been filled with tactical battles and statistical highlights. Looking at their recent head - to - head records, the matches are often fast - paced with a high number of goals, indicating a strong offensive presence from both sides. In the past ten meetings, there have been numerous draws or narrow one - goal victories. This shows that the two teams are relatively evenly matched in terms of strength. As a result, it's extremely challenging for either side to secure a decisive victory. Playing at home, the Chicago Fire may gain some advantages. However, the New England Revolution is also a formidable opponent. In this game, both teams will need to bring their A - game, and the outcome is likely to be closely contested. Both Chicago Fire and New England Revolution are currently ranked in the upper - middle of the Eastern Conference in MLS. Chicago Fire,AH
MLS
Chicago Fire
1-2 New England Revolution
-
JJ BEDDINGSI'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record in providing quality insights. I've tailored a long - term, high - quality product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive performance, Chicago Fire has a significant edge over New England Revolution. Chicago's offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, while New England's is only 14.4%. The xG value also shows Chicago's superiority, with 1.8 compared to New England's 1.2, indicating better offensive efficiency. When it comes to key passing, Chicago Fire's success rate is 62%, leading New England Revolution's 51%. The value of forward passes for Chicago is 12.7, much higher than New England's 9.3, suggesting more efficient passing in the attacking third. In midfield control, Chicago Fire is also in a better position. They average 11.3 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game. Their transition speed of 1.8 seconds is faster than New England's 2.3 seconds. Moreover, Chicago players run 112.4 km per game, 3.8 kAHMLS
Chicago Fire
1-2 New England Revolution
-
Elchanguas_In this crucial MLS Eastern Conference battle, the two teams are separated by just one point. The outcome of this game will have a direct impact on their playoff standings, so both sides are highly motivated. Chicago Fire will play at home, where they have a strong record this season. Their home - game efficiency is quite high. Recently, the team has drawn consecutive matches and remained unbeaten in seven league games. However, the consecutive draws also indicate a lack of finishing ability. They often struggle to convert their dominant play into three points. While their offense is relatively stable, there are still persistent issues in their defense. They've conceded goals in almost every recent game. New England Revolution, with a higher ranking, ended their losing streak by defeating New York City away in the last round. Their offense is centered around the midfield maestro, Hill, and they have a strong counter - attacking threat on the flanks. Nevertheless, the team is in the midO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
1-2 New England Revolution
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post