Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Aykut Tırmıkçı>

    Venezia VS Fiorentina

    Italy Serie A
    Analysis More Tips
    Venezia
    Venezia
    Fiorentina
    Fiorentina
    Further Reading
    • Sup_99
      Sup_99
      Venice has shown a good performance in recent games, winning 4 out of the last 10 matches with 1 draw and 5 losses. On the other hand, Florence has won 4, drawn 2, and lost 4 in the past 10 games, indicating a reliable scoring ability and strong offensive power. Considering overall conditions, Venice is in better form and has a chance to win. In the previous game, Venice was very tenacious, demonstrating its strength in the tough battle. However, it lost 2 out of the last 3 games, which has somewhat affected its combat - effectiveness. Although Venice's state has been unstable, its recent performance is acceptable. Currently, both teams are experiencing fluctuations in form. Florence has had a poor recent run and its current state is worrying. Even though Venice has an obvious advantage in terms of strength, the game situation between the two teams is quite evenly - matched. In this game, the question is whether Venice can continue its winning streak. Venezia has been in good form rece
      AH
      ITA D1 Venezia - Fiorentina
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED
      Venezia Stats In the last games, Venezia has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 40%, while their draw rate stands at 10%. On the other hand, they lost 50% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 40% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 50% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Venezia scores 3 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 20% of the games, and the team scored in 80% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 30% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 60% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 20% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 30%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 0% of the games, 2 goals in 20% of the games, 3 goals in 20% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 60% of the games. Fiorentina Stats In their recent games, Fiorentina has demonstrated varied performance l
      AH
      ITA D1 Venezia - Fiorentina
    • kuban Rodríguez
      kuban Rodríguez Won 9/10
      Venice has been struggling this season, sitting in the middle to lower reaches of the league standings. Their overall competitiveness on the pitch is relatively weak, having lost points in multiple matches. Their win rate is low, and there are prominent issues at both ends of the pitch. In the midfield, they often make passing and receiving mistakes. Up front, their finishing efficiency is poor. On defense, the coordination among defenders is lacking, and their ability to withstand pressure is weak. Although playing at home provides some advantages, their recent home - form has been inconsistent. They find it difficult to maintain dominance and are usually on the back foot when facing strong opponents. Venice primarily employs a 5 - 4 - 1 counter - attacking formation, with a conservative tactical style. In midfield, Bodonzali is responsible for intercepting and disrupting the opponents' plays. On the flanks, Vitale leads the counter - attacks. Up front, Dionisi serves as the focal poi
      AH
      ITA D1 Venezia - Fiorentina
    More Recommend
    • Berlin Union builds its offensive - defensive framework with a 3 - 5 - 2 formation at home. The players rely on wide - range running to cover the pitch. They use intense physical interference to disrupt the opponent's ball - playing rhythm and also have well - designed set - piece tactics. The team runs an average of 116 kilometers per game at home and has 14.2 clearances in the back - field per game on average. The full - backs on the flanks can overlap forward to widen the offensive width, creating shooting space for the midfield players. However, the concentration of the team's defense fluctuates. When facing consecutive attacks by the opponent's substitutes, there are likely to be coordination gaps between the center - backs. Once the midfield connection is interrupted, the defense will be directly exposed to the opponent's quick counter - attacks. Schalke 04 adopts a 4-4-2 balanced formation away from home. They don't blindly push forward but prioritize maintaining proper distance
      AH
      GER D1 Union Berlin - Schalke 04
    • Sevilla, when playing at home, employs a 4-2-3-1 formation. They rely on the passing and combination plays of multiple midfielders to control the game's tempo. They are adept at creating threats in the penalty area through crosses from the flanks and set-pieces. On average at home, the team maintains a ball possession rate of 54.6% and takes 12.4 shots per game. There are plenty of ball touches near the penalty area. However, when Sevilla pushes forward aggressively, gaps appear in their defense. Their backtracking speed when transitioning from attack to defense is relatively slow. If there is a passing error in the midfield, the opponent can seize the opportunity to launch a rapid and deep counter - attack, putting the central defenders' one - on - one defensive abilities to the test. Valencia adopts a pragmatic 4-4-2 low-block tactic away from home. They proactively reduce their demand for ball control, contract the formation to compress the pitch space, and wait for the opponents' m
      AH
      SPA D1 Sevilla - Valencia
    • Cluj adopts a refined and progressive passing and control style of play. Their midfield has a mature rotation and passing system, and they can control the rhythm exquisitely. They are good at gradually changing the opponent's defensive line and exposing defensive gaps. Recently, Cluj has an average ball - possession rate of over 57%. The overall passing success rate reaches 65.3%, and they can deliver 3.5 high - quality key passes per game. Their offensive system of penetrating through the flanks in the front - field is well - developed, and the conversion efficiency of second - chance goals is quite impressive. In midfield, their pressing in the central area is moderate, which can effectively limit the opponent's forward progress. However, their shortcoming is that when facing a compact defense, their offensive methods are rather one - dimensional, and the efficiency of breaking the deadlock is relatively low. As for Universitatea Cluj, although not elaborated in detail here, they wil
      AH
      ROM D1 CFR Cluj Postp. Universitaea Cluj
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.