Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
rozayWon 10/10Follow100%Win Rate +54.9%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
88SOCCERWon 9/9Follow87.5%Win Rate +53.9%ROI 16Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
3
MESSI CLUTCHWon 5/5Follow87.5%Win Rate +55.6%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Obertan4lifeWon 9/10Follow84.6%Win Rate +47%ROI 13Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
5
ConstanceWon 5/5Follow84.2%Win Rate +36%ROI 19Tips 1.66Avg Odds -
6
Favour OchalaFollow81.8%Win Rate +48.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
KingbossToronto FC's recent home - field performance shows a significant imbalance between offense and defense. The team has frequently had high - scoring games in home matches since August. For instance, they drew with Charlotte FC and New York City, which indicates that their front - line attack poses a threat. However, their defense is slow to reposition when transitioning from attack to defense, leaving many gaps in their backline. The corner - kick statistics also reveal that Toronto FC had a 9 - 3 dominance in a home game, highlighting their strong ability to put pressure on the flanks. But if they can't improve their finishing efficiency, the problem of their distracted defense will be magnified in an open - paced game. On the other hand, Toronto FC managed to keep two consecutive clean sheets in away games at the end of July. This shows that they aren't lacking in defensive control. Instead, their tactical focus at home often leans too much towards offense, putting excessive pressure oAH
MLS
Toronto FC
4-4 Chicago Fire
-
ScoopSnaxChicago Fire has shown better offensive efficiency in their encounter with Toronto FC. Their offensive conversion rate is 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.2 for Chicago compared to Toronto's 0.9, indicating Chicago's ability to finish attacks effectively. In terms of passing, Chicago has a key - pass success rate of 82%. The value of their forward - field passes is higher, which creates real threats. In midfield control, Chicago holds a 52% possession rate and combines it with a fast transition speed. This allows them to effectively dictate the game's rhythm. Physically, Chicago has an edge as well. Their total distance covered in the game is 110 km, and they lead in the number of high - intensity sprints. This supports their continuous high - pressure pressing. Chicago Fire has been showing better offensive efficiency in their confrontation with Toronto FC. The offensive finishing conversion rate of Chicago Fire is 22%, higher than Toronto FC's 18%. The xGAHMLS
Toronto FC
4-4 Chicago Fire
-
TEST Coin By Random GuyIn recent matches, the offensive efficiency of Chicago Fire has been more impressive. When facing Toronto FC, their offensive conversion rate stands at 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency is 1.2 compared to Toronto's 0.9, clearly showing their superior ability to finish attacks. Looking at the passing analysis, Chicago's key passing success rate is 82%. Their passes in the front - field carry more value, creating real threats to the opponent. In terms of midfield control, Chicago has a 52% ball - possession rate and combines it with a fast transition speed. This allows them to effectively dictate the game rhythm. Physically, Chicago also has an edge. Their total running distance in a game is 110 km, and they lead in the number of high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage supports their ability to maintain a high - pressure pressing strategy throughout the game. All these factors suggest that Chicago Fire may have a better chance of success in this encounter. ChicaAHMLS
Toronto FC
4-4 Chicago Fire
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post