Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
rozayWon 10/10Follow100%Win Rate +54.9%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
88SOCCERWon 9/9Follow87.5%Win Rate +53.9%ROI 16Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
3
MESSI CLUTCHWon 5/5Follow87.5%Win Rate +55.6%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Obertan4lifeWon 9/10Follow84.6%Win Rate +47%ROI 13Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
5
ConstanceWon 5/5Follow84.2%Win Rate +36%ROI 19Tips 1.66Avg Odds -
6
Favour OchalaFollow81.8%Win Rate +48.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
The Chelsea VerdictLe Havre plays at home, yet their offensive end has shown a poor performance recently. In the last five games, their conversion rate of finishing attacks is only 8.2%, lower than the league average of 12.4%. On the other hand, Brest has a conversion rate of 15.7%, ranking among the top three in Ligue 1, and their xG efficiency is 37% higher. In terms of key pass success rate, Brest reaches 78.4%, significantly better than Le Havre's 63.1%. The offensive passing value index of Brest is 18.3 per 90 minutes, while Le Havre only has 12.7. In midfield control, Brest maintains a stable possession rate of 58%. Their average transition speed is 4.2 meters per second, faster than Le Havre's 3.4 meters per second. This effectively suppresses the rhythm of Le Havre's defensive line reorganization. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Set up notifications to stay informed！ Brest has shown remarkable superiority in running distance and high - intensity sAH
FRA D1
Le Havre
1-2 Stade Brestois
-
BET ENSURED Won 12/20Le Havre Stats In the last games, Le Havre has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 30%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 50% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 20% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 20% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Le Havre scores 1 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 20% of the games, and the team scored in 70% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 20% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 50% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 10% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 20%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 40% of the games, 2 goals in 30% of the games, 3 goals in 20% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 10% of the games. Brest Stats In their recent games, Brest has demonstrated varied performance levels.AHFRA D1
Le Havre
1-2 Stade Brestois
-
JAYSON✨Le Havre's current form is a cause for concern. With a record of 30 wins, 20 draws, and 50 losses, they are in a slump. Their goal difference stands at -1, and they only manage to score one goal per game on average. Defensively, although they have conceded 11 goals, their ability to keep a clean sheet is severely lacking. Their home form is even more worrying. Their home win rate has dropped to 25%, with no draws and a 75% loss rate, indicating a lack of resilience at home. Based on the data of 2.9 corner kicks and 1.4 yellow cards per game, the home team often relies on set - pieces to create chaos in the opponent's defense. However, their finishing is poor, and limited midfield control often leaves their defense in reactive positions. On the other hand, Brest has a record of 10 wins, 60 draws, and 30 losses. They score 1.5 goals per game on average but have conceded 19, showing an obvious imbalance between attack and defense with a goal difference of -4. Brest shows a balanced away rO/UFRA D1
Le Havre
1-2 Stade Brestois
FRA D1
More Recommend
-
Looking at the recent data comparison, Santa Fe United has a lower offensive finishing conversion rate of 12.3% than the league average, and an xG efficiency of 0.72, lower than their opponent's 0.85. On the other hand, Instituto de Córdoba has a better key - passing success rate of 61%, compared to Santa Fe United's 54%. However, their forward - field passing value is only 2.1 times per 90 minutes, ranking at the bottom of the league. In terms of midfield control, there is a significant difference between the two teams. Santa Fe United has a slightly better average ball - possession rate of 52% per game. But their transition speed is only 4.2 times per 90 minutes, lower than Instituto de Córdoba's 5.1 times. The difference in running distance is also obvious. Santa Fe United runs an average of 113 km per game and has 18 high - intensity sprints, both lower than Instituto de Córdoba's 22 times. In defense, Instituto de Córdoba has 11 tackles and 7 interceptions per game on average,O/U
ARG D1
Club Atlético Unión
-
Instituto AC Cordoba
ARG D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post