Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Aykut Tırmıkçı>

    Burnley VS Middlesbrough

    England Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Burnley
    Burnley
    Middlesbrough
    Middlesbrough
    Further Reading
    • SmolBeans
      SmolBeans
      Burnley has been plagued by a high number of injuries. Middlesbrough, on the other hand, has struggled to find the back of the net consistently. Both teams are giving their all, especially Middlesbrough, which has shown significant improvement recently and has a rising trend. Despite the recent progress, Middlesbrough's overall form has been a bit up - and - down. They had a streak of four defeats, and their defense has been a bit shaky in recent games. In terms of performance, Burnley seems to have the upper hand. Historically, when Burnley falls behind, it often ends up losing the game. In this upcoming encounter, Burnley has put in a commendable performance so far. It's hard to say which team will seize the initiative in this match. With Burnley's better overall performance and Middlesbrough's inconsistent form, it's going to be an exciting battle to watch and see which team can come out on top. Burnley recently ended a period of inconsistent form with a win, which has significantly
      O/U
      ENG LCH Burnley - Middlesbrough
    • Alexandre de Quadros
      Alexandre de Quadros
      Burnley has shown significant fluctuations in form. In the recent five matches, after suffering away defeats, 1-4 to Norwich and 1-3 to West Bromwich Albion, they managed a 2-2 draw at home against West Ham United. They also played out goalless and 1-1 draws against Bradford and Notts County respectively in the EFL Cup. Statistics on corner kicks reveal that Burnley had 3-5, 5-14, 3-5, 5-6, and 4-3 corner kicks in these five games, with an average of only 4.8. This is notably lower than their opponents', indicating a lack of consistency in the attacking department. Their defensive frailties were exposed in the first - half score of 3-1 against Norwich on the road. On the other hand, Middlesbrough has demonstrated a more stable performance, winning four out of their last five matches. Their victories include a 3-1 home win over West Bromwich Albion, a 3-1 victory against Doncaster in the EFL Cup, a 2-1 home win over Lincoln City, and a 1-0 win against Wrexham in the EFL Cup. The team's
      O/U
      ENG LCH Burnley - Middlesbrough
    • JJ BEDDINGS
      JJ BEDDINGS
      Burnley has shown a stronger offensive performance compared to Middlesbrough. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than Middlesbrough's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 to 0.92 further reflects Burnley's better offensive conversion ability. In terms of passing, Burnley's key - pass success rate is 62%, leading Middlesbrough's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.83, more efficient than Middlesbrough's 1.35. In the midfield battle, Burnley has 14 interceptions while Middlesbrough only has 9. Burnley also controls the ball for an average of 58% of the game, suppressing their opponents. Regarding physical performance, Burnley's total running distance is 112.4 km, compared to Middlesbrough's 108.7 km. Their high - intensity sprint count of 67.42 demonstrates a significant physical advantage. Defensively, Burnley outperforms Middlesbrough across the board. They have 18 tackles compared to 12, 24 interceptions against 18, and 9 clearances against 6. On the o
      O/U
      ENG LCH Burnley - Middlesbrough
    More Recommend
    • Queen's Park Rangers adopts a smooth ground passing and cutting style. The short - pass cooperation between the midfield and front - line players is highly coordinated. The players make frequent and seamless runs, and they are good at creating gaps in the opponent's defense through steady passing. Recently, their passing success rate has been stably maintained at 59.7%. They can deliver 3.0 key passes per game on average. Their penetration tactics on the flanks of the front - field are well - developed, with a rich offensive structure and strong offensive continuity. The midfielders can flexibly control the rhythm of the game and adapt to different levels of confrontation. However, their weakness is that when facing intense and close - range pressing, the stability of their passing decreases. Moreover, their focus in both offense and defense may slightly decline in the second half of the game. Cardiff City adheres to a defensive and offensive philosophy of steady progress. Their three
      AH
      ENG LCH Queens Park Rangers (QPR) - Cardiff City
    • Milwall has developed a tough and well - balanced local playing style. Relying on their abundant physical fitness, they engage in intense midfield battles. They have a high level of physical confrontation and are good at disrupting the opponent's passing and control rhythm through local tussles. Recently, the team has an average of 9.1 midfield interceptions per game, and the success rate of confrontation remains stable at around 52%. This effectively blocks the opponent's vertical advancement. Their performance in aerial ball contests in the back - field is stable, and they have reliable anti - air pressure resistance. In terms of front - court offense, their style is simple and practical. However, their shortcoming is the lack of finesse in passing and control. The tactical methods for breaking down the opponent's defense are relatively limited. Rotherham adapts well to the intense physicality and fast - paced nature of the matches. Their offensive and defensive system is characteriz
      AH
      ENG LCH Millwall - Wrexham
    • Cluj adopts a refined and progressive passing and control style of play. Their midfield has a mature rotation and passing system, and they can control the rhythm exquisitely. They are good at gradually changing the opponent's defensive line and exposing defensive gaps. Recently, Cluj has an average ball - possession rate of over 57%. The overall passing success rate reaches 65.3%, and they can deliver 3.5 high - quality key passes per game. Their offensive system of penetrating through the flanks in the front - field is well - developed, and the conversion efficiency of second - chance goals is quite impressive. In midfield, their pressing in the central area is moderate, which can effectively limit the opponent's forward progress. However, their shortcoming is that when facing a compact defense, their offensive methods are rather one - dimensional, and the efficiency of breaking the deadlock is relatively low. As for Universitatea Cluj, although not elaborated in detail here, they wil
      AH
      ROM D1 CFR Cluj Postp. Universitaea Cluj
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.