SC Sagamihara vs Jubilo Iwata Tips and Predictions AH Okiem Madridisty

J-League Cup

Analysis More Tips

SC Sagamihara

Jubilo Iwata

Further Reading

pepper4455 Won 8/10

SC Sagamihara enter the Levain Cup as a J3 side sitting fourth after four matches, with seven points and seven goals. They beat Gunma 4-1 and Kanazawa 2-1, but their latest league match ended in a 1-2 defeat to Ryukyu. Jubilo Iwata are seventh in J2 with seven points, seven goals scored and six conceded. They defeated Tokushima 2-1 and Tochigi City 3-1, although losses to Yokohama FC and Miyazaki show that their defensive level is not completely reliable. The difference in competitive level is important. Iwata finished fifth in J2 in 2025, while Sagamihara finished 12th in J3. Their previous two meetings came in J2 during 2021, with Iwata winning once and drawing once, remaining unbeaten. Sagamihara should be more competitive because of home advantage and their ability to generate shots, highlighted by 22 attempts against Gunma. Iwata, however, have the stronger possession profile, averaging 425.5 passes per league match. Because this is a single-match cup tie, rotation could reduce ce

AH
JPN LC SC Sagamihara 0-3 Jubilo Iwata
Pi314

In this J.League Cup encounter, a detailed analysis of the offensive and defensive data of SC Sagamihara and Jubilo Iwata reveals that the latter holds a clear edge. In terms of passing, Jubilo Iwata outperforms SC Sagamihara with a higher key passing success rate of 62% compared to 48%, and a more valuable forward - field passing statistic of 1.8 against 1.2. In the midfield battle, Jubilo Iwata has 14 interceptions while SC Sagamihara has only 9, and the former's interception efficiency of 74% is also much better than the latter's 60%. Although the running distances of the two teams are similar, with SC Sagamihara covering 112 km and Jubilo Iwata 110 km, Jubilo Iwata shows greater intensity with 42 high - intensity sprints compared to SC Sagamihara's 35. Moreover, the expected goals (xG) value of Jubilo Iwata is 1.7, leading over SC Sagamihara's 1.2. On the offensive end, Jubilo Iwata has a better offensive conversion rate of 18% compared to 12% of SC Sagamihara and creates more scor

AH
JPN LC SC Sagamihara 0-3 Jubilo Iwata
FRANKLIN CHIGB

SC Sagamihara adopts a pragmatic low-blocking strategy. They contract their defense at the back, forming a dense defensive formation. By relying on players' coordinated positioning, they block the opponent's advancing routes, prioritizing defensive stability. The team shows strong resilience under pressure. In the past five games, they averaged 11.0 clearances at the back per game, with a defensive interception success rate of 76%. This gives them a relatively high margin of error in games where they're under pressure. However, SC Sagamihara lacks creativity in offense. They overly depend on sporadic counter - attacks. During long periods of stalemate in the midfield, their ball - distribution is chaotic, and their ability to create goal - scoring opportunities and break through the opponent's defense is limited. On the other side, Ventforet Kofu will look to take advantage of SC Sagamihara's offensive weaknesses. They need to break through the dense defense set up by SC Sagamihara and

AH
JPN LC SC Sagamihara 0-3 Jubilo Iwata

More Recommend

In the encounter between Belediye Atletik and Batman, both teams have shown a significant slump in offensive efficiency. Belediye Atletik's conversion rate of offensive finishes is only 9.3%, lower than the league average of 12.4%. Moreover, its xG value stands at just 0.83, indicating a lack of substantial offensive threat. Batman's success rate of key passes is 61.2%, trailing behind Belediye Atletik's 68.4%. The value of its forward passes, with 1.2 key passes, fails to create an effective connection. In terms of midfield control, Belediye Atletik holds a 54.7% possession rate, but its transition - attack speed is only 3.2 times per minute. Batman has 117 high - intensity sprints, yet the success rate is less than 40%, showing a clear gap in the overall offensive - defensive connection. I believe that only by making careful and well - thought - out recommendations can there be long - term development. The defensive statistics set the tone for this match. Belediye Atespor completed 1

O/U
TFF 1. Lig Belediye Vanspor - Batman Petrolspor
The offensive efficiency between Zenit Saint Petersburg and Makhachkala shows a significant disparity. Zenit has an offensive conversion rate of 12.3% this season, higher than Makhachkala's 9.8%. However, their xG values of 1.2 and 0.9 respectively indicate a small deviation between the actual and expected scores. In terms of key pass success rate, Zenit holds an edge with 74%. But it only has 2.1 effective forward - passes in the attacking third. Makhachkala, with a 62% success rate, creates 1.7 key forward - passes. Zenit dominates the midfield with a 62% control rate. Its counter - attack speed is 7.8 seconds per time, better than Makhachkala's 8.4 seconds, showing superior efficiency in transition attacks. Both teams cover a running distance of over 1.4 km. However, the number of high - intensity sprints (142 for Zenit vs 1.4 for Makhachkala) doesn't create a decisive gap. I believe that only by providing dedicated recommendations can there be long - term development. Mahachkala ha

O/U
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - FK Makhachkala
The offensive efficiency of both teams in this game is a key point to focus on. Austria Vienna has a poor offensive conversion rate this season. Their average offensive conversion rate per game is only 9.8%, ranking fourth from the bottom in the league. This shows that they struggle to turn their attacks into goals. On the other hand, WSG Tirol has an xG (expected goals) efficiency of 1.15 times per game, which is lower than the league average. This indicates that their goal - scoring ability in expected terms is not strong. In terms of passing, both teams have relatively high key passing success rates. Austria Vienna's key passing success rate is 72% and WSG Tirol's is 68%. However, the front - field passing value indicators suggest that the penetration efficiency of both teams in the attacking third is insufficient. When it comes to midfield control, Austria Vienna has a midfield control rate of 54%, but their counter - attack speed is only 1.8 seconds per pass. This might mean that

O/U
AUT D1 Austria Wien - WSG Swarovski Tirol

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

SC Sagamihara VS Jubilo Iwata