Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Eldy Febriansyah
740
Articles
0
Like
2
Follower
53.8%
Win Rate
+0.2%
ROI
42
Tips
1.93
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Tesni¹ˢᵗ11Won 8/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +60.4%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Analysis VIP99Won 10/12Follow83.3%Win Rate +32.5%ROI 12Tips 1.56Avg Odds -
3
EyanescobarFollow82.6%Win Rate +48%ROI 24Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Prince_MeshFollow82.1%Win Rate +58.9%ROI 28Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
OssOssOssWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
amadousyWon 6/6Follow80.8%Win Rate +42.4%ROI 26Tips 1.88Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Kei R🐉 Won 4/6Sunderland enjoys a passionate home - field atmosphere at the Stadium of Light. Last season, they secured a spot in European competitions, showing good resilience. They are adept at flanking attacks and pose a threat from set - pieces. However, in the new season, they are involved in two competitions. After playing an UEFA Europa Conference League play - off in mid - week, they suffered significant fatigue. In the opening league game, they lost in the away match at the last minute. Their finishing efficiency in attack is mediocre, and their defensive line lacks stability. On the other hand, Fulham had an excellent performance in the first league round at home, going toe - to - toe with Chelsea. Their offensive system functioned smoothly, and their new striker signings integrated well immediately. They made extensive rotations in the League Cup in mid - week, allowing their main players to rest fully, thus having an edge in terms of physical condition. The team has flexible tactics, capAH
ENG PR
Sunderland A.F.C
0-0
Fulham
88 -
JJ BEDDINGSFulham has been in better form recently compared to Sunderland. In the recent matches, Sunderland has an average of 12.3 offensive terminations per game, but the conversion rate is only 11%. Meanwhile, Fulham records 14.8 offensive terminations with a 16% conversion rate. In terms of passing value in the front - field, Fulham reaches 68.4, while Sunderland only has 59.2. In the midfield, Fulham shows better defensive ability with an interception rate of 32%, outperforming Sunderland's 24%. Regarding the high - intensity running distance, Fulham covers 118 km, while Sunderland only manages 109 km. The xG value of Fulham is 1.8, higher than Sunderland's 1.2. Also, Fulham averages 8.7 tackles per game, compared to Sunderland's 4.3. Overall, based on these statistics, Fulham seems to have an edge over Sunderland. I am good at selecting matches by analyzing unique problems and rare data. Fulham has been in excellent form recently, showing greater efficiency at the offensive end. Their key pAHENG PR
Sunderland A.F.C
0-0
Fulham
-
TobessaSunderland has been struggling with frequent injuries. On the other hand, Durham has shown some fluctuations recently. They've scored a lot of goals and have a decent defense, but their performance this season has also been underwhelming. The form of both teams has been up and down, and their defenses seem rather porous. The gap in strength between the two sides is not significant, and both have the potential to strive for higher positions. The number of goals conceded reflects the difference in strength to some extent. The performance at both ends of the pitch is not much different from their away - game displays. Durham's performance varies from that of Sunderland. Durham's forwards are relatively weak, which poses a certain risk. Overall, Durham's form has been mediocre, and they rank in the upper - middle of the league. However, their last game was a disappointing one. Although the recent situations of the two teams are different, they both have obvious advantages and are in greatO/UENG PR
Sunderland A.F.C
0-0
Fulham
ENG PR
More Recommend
-
Manchester United's performance this season places them in the middle of the league table, with an overall win rate of 40%. They score an average of 1.7 goals per game and concede 1.2 times per game, resulting in a goal difference of +5. This indicates a relatively balanced attack and defense. However, their away - game form is notably weak. With a win rate of only 33.3%, they average 1.5 goals and 1.5 conceded goals per away game. This shows a clear imbalance in their attack and defense when playing away from home. On the other hand, Ipswich Town is in a much stronger position. They have an outstanding overall win rate of 70%. Their offensive firepower is evident with an average of 2.1 goals per game, while their defense is also solid, conceding only 1.1 times per game, leading to a goal difference of +10. What's particularly remarkable is Ipswich's consistent away - game performance. Their 50% away win rate is quite impressive. They average 2 goals and concede 1.16 goals per away gamO/UENG PR
Manchester United
-
Ipswich Town
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post