Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tesni¹ˢᵗ11Won 8/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +60.4%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
AI Soccer PredictorWon 5/6Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
3
IqtidarWon 16/20Follow81.4%Win Rate +40.7%ROI 49Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
4
OssOssOssWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
Hong Duc 🔶 BNBFollow81.3%Win Rate +38.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
YαѕмιηWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 26Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍Chicago Fire shows a clear edge over Seattle Sounders when it comes to offensive efficiency. The offensive conversion rate of Chicago is 22%, while that of Seattle is only 18%. In terms of xG efficiency, Chicago's 1.2 outperforms Seattle's 0.9, indicating a more effective finishing ability. When analyzing passing efficiency, Chicago also takes the lead. The success rate of key passes in Chicago reaches 85%, higher than Seattle's 80%. This suggests that Chicago's passes in the front - court are more valuable and can create more substantial threats. In the midfield control aspect, Chicago holds a 58% possession rate and has a rapid transition speed (an average of 8 seconds). These factors enable them to effectively dominate the game rhythm. Looking at the running data, Chicago has an advantage in both the total running distance of 140km (compared to Seattle's 110km) and the number of high - intensity sprints. This indicates that Chicago has a better physical reserve, which is crucial forAH
MLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
The Chelsea VerdictSeattle Sounders are in a strong position against Chicago Fire. In the offensive aspect, Seattle Sounders have a 12% higher conversion rate in finishing attacks compared to their opponents. Their xG value of 1.8 is superior to Chicago's 1.2. With a key - pass success rate of 72% against Chicago's 65%, they demonstrate better organizational ability in attack. Their forward - field passing value leads by 15%. In midfield control, Seattle Sounders hold a 68% control rate, suppressing their opponents. They can achieve 2.3 effective attacks per minute in transition. The whole team runs an average of 11.2 km, with 24 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. On the defensive end, Seattle Sounders have 18 tackles, 33% more than Chicago's 12. Their interception efficiency is 20% higher, and they are also more efficient in clearing the ball. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Set up the push notifications to stay updated. SeaAHMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
Salvador González ValeroThe current form of the two teams presents a stark contrast. Seattle Sounders have a record of 7 wins, 4 draws, and 9 losses, amassing 25 points. They sit in the 13th position in the Western Conference, firmly in the lower half of the standings. On the other hand, Chicago Fire have a much better record of 11 wins, 3 draws, and 6 losses, with 36 points. They are placed 3rd in the Eastern Conference, in a strong position at the top of the standings. In terms of overall ranking and points, Chicago Fire significantly outshine Seattle Sounders. However, when looking at their head - to - head records in the past 6 official matches, Seattle Sounders hold a slight edge with 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. In the most recent encounter, Seattle Sounders defeated Chicago Fire 2 - 1 at home. This historical performance might give Seattle Sounders some psychological advantage going into the upcoming game. The Seattle Sounders are facing a significant setback with as many as ten players out. Among theO/UMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post