Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
The Chelsea Verdict
290
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
41.3%
Win Rate
-18.9%
ROI
50
Tips
1.94
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Tesni¹ˢᵗ11Follow88.9%Win Rate +60.4%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Grey🎧 big speakers 🌍💸Follow83.3%Win Rate +54.4%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
AI Soccer PredictorWon 5/6Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
4
OssOssOssWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
IqtidarFollow81%Win Rate +39.4%ROI 48Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
6
YαѕмιηFollow80%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 26Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Samuel LuckhurstSeattle Sounders' home performance in the current MLS season has been quite inconsistent. In their 9 home games, they've managed 4 wins, 1 draw, and 4 losses, with a win - ratio of 44.4%. They scored 14 goals while conceding 16, resulting in a negative goal difference of 2 and 13 points. But their recent form has taken a nosedive. In their last 6 games across all competitions, they've only managed a single draw and suffered 5 defeats. They scored just 4 goals and conceded 11, with a goal difference of -7 and a win - ratio dropping to 0.0%, earning only 1 point. This slump clearly shows the team's systemic problems in both offense and defense. The defensive issues are particularly glaring, as they're conceding an average of 1.83 goals per game, far exceeding the league average. This has made it hard for them to turn their home - field advantage into victories. Although Seattle has a decent offensive efficiency at home, they struggle with tactical execution in high - intensity games. FreAH
MLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
GideonJIlposSeattle Sounders are in excellent attacking form. Their offensive conversion rate is 12% higher than that of Chicago Fire. The xG value of 1.8 is more favorable than Chicago's 1.2. In terms of organization, they also have an edge. The key pass success rate of 72% compared to 65% shows their stronger organizational ability, and the value of forward passes is 15% higher. They control the midfield with a rate of 68%, and their transition speed allows them to complete 2.3 effective attacks per minute. In addition, the whole team has better physical fitness. The average running distance per player is 11.2 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 0.24 more, indicating sufficient physical reserves. On the defensive end, Seattle Sounders are also dominant. They have 33% more tackles (18 vs 12) than Chicago Fire, their interception efficiency is 20% higher, and they are more efficient in clearing the ball. Seattle Sounders have been in good form at home this season. In their last fiveAHMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
Ayomide ilesanmi Won 3/4Seattle Sounders are in a dire situation as they have failed to secure a win in their last nine league games, hitting a new low in form. Currently, they stand 13th in the Western Conference with 25 points from 7 wins, 9 draws, and 4 losses. On the other hand, Chicago Fire are in excellent shape, having remained unbeaten in their last four league games, with 3 wins and 1 draw. They sit 3rd in the Eastern Conference, boasting 36 points from 11 wins, 6 draws, and 3 losses. This disparity in form will likely play a significant role in the game. Seattle, playing at home, will be desperate to turn their fortunes around. The home - field advantage might give them an extra boost, but their recent poor performances are a major concern. Chicago Fire, with their strong current form, will be confident of taking the three points. They have shown great consistency in recent matches and will look to capitalize on Seattle's slump. It's clear that the visitors hold the upper hand in this encounter.AHMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
MLS
More Recommend
-
The recent performance of both teams shows significant differences. The Colorado Rapids have an offensive finishing conversion rate of 18.3%, which is lower than the league average. In contrast, Real Salt Lake has an xG efficiency of 1.24 per 90 minutes, leading the Rapids by 0.42. The Rapids' key pass success rate is only 58%, while Real Salt Lake has 1.7 more valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Salt Lake averages 12.1 interceptions per game, 3.4 more than the Rapids. Their transition speed is also 12% faster. Running statistics reveal that the away team, Real Salt Lake, has 32 high - intensity sprints per 90 minutes, 6 more than the home team, indicating a notable physical advantage. I can offer precise analysis and recommendations for daily games. Set up notifications to stay updated！ Royal Salt Lake City has a significant edge over the Colorado Rapids in both defense and offense. In defense, Royal Salt Lake City is highly efficient. They make 14.3 tacklesAHMLS
Colorado Rapids
-
Real Salt Lake
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post