Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
rewat.32@OfficiaWon 7/7Follow88.9%Win Rate +64.1%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
OssOssOssWon 9/9Follow87.5%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 16Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
Igodo oyounvieWon 14/16Follow87.5%Win Rate +42.9%ROI 16Tips 1.67Avg Odds -
4
WissywaxplanetWon 9/9Follow85%Win Rate +27.2%ROI 20Tips 1.51Avg Odds -
5
Femi The PlugWon 8/8Follow84.6%Win Rate +57%ROI 13Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
Pablo CFollow84.6%Win Rate +52.8%ROI 13Tips 1.88Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Nikhil KumarThe current standings put both teams in a precarious position, sitting 11th and 12th respectively, making this an early "relegation - zone skirmish". Let's look at the recent form of each team. Necaxa has had a mixed run in their last five games, picking up two wins, one draw, and two losses, amassing seven points. They've scored seven goals and conceded eight. In their last ten matches, the record stands at four wins, two draws, and four losses. However, their recent form has been on a downward slope, with three consecutive win - less league games (two draws and one loss). On a positive note, their home form has been solid. In three home games, they've won two and lost one, a 67% win - rate. As for Cruz Azul, they've won two and lost three in their first five games, only managing six points. They've scored eight goals but conceded ten. In the last ten games, they have five wins, a draw, and four losses. Despite being the Spring League champions, they're currently in the midst of a thrO/U
MEX D1
Necaxa
1-3 CDSyC Cruz Azul
-
amvn Won 6/10I'm a prominent expert in sports analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for enthusiasts. In this comparison, Necaxa shows a better offensive performance. Its offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than Cruz Azul's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of Necaxa is 0.78, while Cruz Azul only has 0.55, indicating a more efficient attack. However, Cruz Azul has its own strengths in passing. The key passing success rate of Cruz Azul is 62%, superior to Necaxa's 55%. But in terms of the value of forward passes, Cruz Azul's 1.23 is lower than Necaxa's 1.41. Necaxa also demonstrates great energy on the field. They cover a total distance of 118.6 km, with 23 high - intensity sprints. Their midfield control rate reaches 58%, and the transition speed is 1.8 seconds per play. On the defensive side, Cruz Azul has an edge. They record 12 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, showing a more solid defensive effort.O/UMEX D1
Necaxa
1-3 CDSyC Cruz Azul
-
GoalwireHQ Won 6/7Necaxa is playing at home. The team's form has been quite inconsistent. In attack, they can score goals steadily. Forward Carranza has a high scoring rate and is good at dribbling on the wing and making runs into the box. However, their defense has obvious flaws, conceding an average of more goals per game. There are frequent mistakes in the coordination of the back - line, and they have conceded goals in many recent matches. As a traditional powerhouse, Cruz Azul has been in a poor run recently, suffering consecutive defeats, which has dampened their morale. Both their offense and defense have problems. They can create opportunities in attack but lack the finishing touch. There are more mistakes in the defensive line's positioning and coordination. The team has suffered few injuries, and the main players in the midfield and attack can play. When playing away, Cruz Azul won't focus on ball - possession. Instead, they will first compact their formation to strengthen the defense. They reO/UMEX D1
Necaxa
1-3 CDSyC Cruz Azul
MEX D1
More Recommend
-
In the historical encounters between Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps in the MLS, the corner - kick statistics reveal a distinct tactical contrast. In the last nine meetings, Chicago Fire has a poor record in corner - kicks when playing at home. For instance, in previous home matches, they lost 0 - 1, and the corner - kick difference was - 5; they drew 1 - 1 with a corner - kick difference of - 2; they won 4 - 0 but still had a corner - kick difference of - 5; and they lost 0 - 2 with a corner - kick difference of 0. This shows that Chicago Fire struggles to create corner - kick opportunities in their home games. On the other hand, Vancouver Whitecaps have an outstanding ability to generate corner - kicks when playing away. In an away game, they won 1 - 0, and the corner - kick difference was 5, highlighting their edge in corner - kicks on the road. When it comes to matches at Vancouver's home, they lost 1 - 3 with a corner - kick difference of - 6 and also lost 1 - 3 with a cornerO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post