Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Igodo oyounvieWon 4/4Follow90%Win Rate +40.3%ROI 20Tips 1.60Avg Odds -
2
OssOssOssWon 6/6Follow88.9%Win Rate +52.1%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
rewat.32@OfficiaFollow88.9%Win Rate +64.1%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
GARAGARABOLAFollow87.5%Win Rate +50%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
JFollow86.7%Win Rate +50.4%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
CatatanAli7Won 10/11Follow83.3%Win Rate +59.5%ROI 13Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Diego 10Recent encounter data in the Europa Cup shows that in a match, Universitatea Craiova drew 1-1 at home against Alashkert Armenia, with the halftime score also 1-1 and the full - time corner kick count at 8 - 4. This data is a key point. Universitatea Craiova's 8 corners compared to Alashkert Armenia's 4 indicate that the former had a clear edge in offensive initiative and ball - control efficiency. The number of corner kicks is directly related to a team's ability to break through on the flanks and the threat of crosses. The 8 - 4 gap not only shows that Universitatea Craiova established offensive dominance in the first half but also implies that their set - piece tactics were more effectively executed. The 1 - 1 score in the first half confirmed the close contest in the attack - defense transitions. Universitatea Craiova took the initiative in the offensive rhythm thanks to their corner - kick advantage, while Alashkert Armenia faced continuous pressure from corner kicks on the defensiO/U
UEFA EL
FC Ararat Armenia
1-0 CS Universitatea Craiova
-
Jc & Vr Servicios GeneralesArarat Yerevan has brought in a strong reinforcement, and they are in good form, aiming to secure a win in this match. It's bound to be a tough battle. Although Universitatea Craiova has a certain gap in performance compared to Ararat Yerevan, both teams have goal - scoring abilities, but they're not favored in the statistics. Universitatea Craiova's overall form is improving recently. However, they had a four - game losing streak, and their defense has been shaky in recent matches. On the other hand, Ararat Yerevan has strong combat capabilities. After the main players got sufficient rest, the team's goal - scoring numbers have been guaranteed in recent games. Their attacking power is decent. Meanwhile, Universitatea Craiova has improved its defense to some extent. Ararat Yerevan is striving for victory in this game. It remains to be seen whether they can win this exciting showdown. Ararat Yerevan has seen a significant improvement recently, mainly due to their outstanding performanceO/UUEFA EL
FC Ararat Armenia
1-0 CS Universitatea Craiova
-
unaiArarat Yerevan has been in great form lately, securing some impressive results. On the other hand, Universitatea Craiova has seen a significant dip in their recent performance. Ararat Yerevan controls the game rhythm with a solid defensive - counterattack strategy. They've been quite consistent in front of goal, scoring in almost every game, which shows their good attacking capabilities. In terms of historical records, the home - field advantage favors Ararat Yerevan. When comparing the overall strength of the two teams, Ararat Yerevan clearly has the upper hand. Although Universitatea Craiova is the underdog, they approach this game with a positive attitude. However, if they fall behind, they often struggle to turn the game around and usually end up losing. Ararat Yerevan's performance in this match is expected to be commendable. The question remains, which team will be able to showcase its true strength and claim the victory? Ararat Yerevan has been performing quite well recently, shO/UUEFA EL
FC Ararat Armenia
1-0 CS Universitatea Craiova
UEFA EL
More Recommend
-
Vancouver Whitecaps have shown better form in their head - to - head encounters with Chicago Fire. In terms of offensive efficiency, Vancouver Whitecaps have a clear edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14%, while Chicago Fire only manages 10%. The xG efficiency also favors Vancouver, with a score of 1.2 compared to Chicago's 0.8. When it comes to passing, Vancouver outperforms Chicago. The success rate of their key passes is 84%, higher than Chicago's 74%. Moreover, the value of their front - court passes, at 0.4, is significantly better. In midfield control, Vancouver has a ball - possession rate of 44%. Their average transition speed is 8 seconds, which is faster than Chicago's 10 seconds. Looking at the running data, Vancouver's total running distance is 110 km, and they have 200 high - intensity sprints. These figures are higher than Chicago's 104 km and 180 sprints, indicating their physical fitness advantage. Overall, based on these data, Vancouver Whitecaps seem to bAH
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
-
In the Romanian League encounter between Universitatea Cluj and CFR Cluj, there are distinct differences in the offensive efficiency of the two sides. The home team has a much - better offensive conversion rate, standing at 22% compared to the away team's 15%. This indicates that the home team is more capable of finishing their attacks. The xG (expected goals) comparison of 1.8 to 1.2 further highlights their superiority in front of the goal. In terms of passing statistics, the home team's key passing success rate is 78%, outperforming the away team's 65%. The difference in the value of forward passes, 0.45 to 0.32, shows that the home team has a more efficient offensive organization. The home team also dominates in midfield control. With a 62% possession rate and 15 fast - break attacks, they outnumber the away team's 9 fast - break opportunities. Regarding physical fitness, the home team has 128 high - intensity sprints, far exceeding the away team's 96. The difference in running disO/U
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
MLS
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post