Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
OssOssOssWon 4/4Follow83.3%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 25Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
SPORT249Won 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +24.8%ROI 18Tips 1.63Avg Odds -
3
CatatanAli7Won 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +52.2%ROI 11Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
mata jalyWon 4/5Follow79.3%Win Rate +28.3%ROI 29Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
5
Justinus LhaksanWon 15/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +42.8%ROI 25Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
6
Declan ₿Won 9/10Follow77.8%Win Rate +35.9%ROI 37Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Lucas DLooking at the latest 10 - game statistics, Doncaster has an overall win rate of 30%, a draw rate of 40%, and a loss rate of 30%. They average 1.5 goals per game and concede 1.0 goal per game. In addition, they only receive 0.4 yellow cards on average in defense per game, showing good discipline and stability. However, it's worth noting that Doncaster has a weak away record. Their win - rate away from home is 0%, with a draw rate of 33.3% and a loss rate of 66.6%, indicating an obvious weakness in away games. On the other hand, Middlesbrough has an overall win rate of 20%, a draw rate of 50%, and a loss rate of 30%. They average 1.2 goals per game and concede 1.4 goals per game, which means their offensive and defensive efficiency is slightly lower than Doncaster. Moreover, they receive 0.8 yellow cards on average in defense per game, suggesting a lack of tactical discipline. Middlesbrough also struggles at home, with a win - rate of 0%, a draw rate of 60%, and a loss rate of 40%, highO/U
ENG LC
Doncaster Rovers
1-3 Middlesbrough
-
amvn Won 11/17I'm a well - known expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for my followers. Doncaster shows a clear edge over Middlesbrough in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Doncaster's attack conversion rate is 18.3%, better than Middlesbrough's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 1.23 for Doncaster compared to 0.89 for Middlesbrough indicates that Doncaster poses a greater threat in the attacking third. When it comes to passing, Doncaster's key pass success rate stands at 62%, leading Middlesbrough's 55%. The value of their forward passes is 12.7, much more efficient than Middlesbrough's 9.3. In the midfield, Doncaster controls the ball 58% of the time while Middlesbrough has it only 42%. They also have a quicker transition speed, with an average reduction of 1.2 seconds. Their players cover a total running distance of 112 km, 3 km more than their opponents, and the frequency of high - intensity sprints is 27% higher. On the defensive side, Doncaster iO/UENG LC
Doncaster Rovers
1-3 Middlesbrough
-
Emile Smith RoweHistorical head - to - head data reveals significant tactical differences between Doncaster and Middlesbrough. In a previous EFL Cup encounter, Doncaster thrashed Middlesbrough 4 - 0 away from home. They were already 2 - 0 up at half - time and had a dominant 7 - 2 lead in corner kicks, clearly exposing Middlesbrough's defensive vulnerabilities. However, Middlesbrough has shown its strength when hosting Doncaster in the Championship. They won 4 - 0 at home in one match and 3 - 0 in another. On the other hand, Doncaster managed to beat Middlesbrough 2 - 1 at home in one instance and drew 0 - 0 in another. In recent friendly matches, Middlesbrough has demonstrated excellent corner - kick creation ability. Against Doncaster, they had a 10 - 2 lead in corner kicks, which indicates their efficient attacking on the flanks. This upcoming EFL Cup match is likely to see both teams leveraging their past experiences and strengths. Doncaster may look to replicate their previous big - win performanO/UENG LC
Doncaster Rovers
1-3 Middlesbrough
ENG LC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post