Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Osasuna VS Levante

    Spanish La Liga
    Analysis More Tips
    Osasuna
    Osasuna
    Levante
    Levante
    Further Reading
    • KUNMI》💙《
      KUNMI》💙《 Won 4/5
      Osasuna has long been a mid - table team in La Liga. The team's tactical style is tough and practical, focusing on physical confrontation and team defense. The players have a high level of tactical execution, and their performance on the field is stable with few significant fluctuations. Recently, the team's match results have been mediocre, with balanced offensive and defensive data. On the defensive end, their positioning and coordinated defense systems are well - developed, and they are excellent at controlling the number of goals conceded. On the offensive end, the rhythm is relatively slow, emphasizing stability, and the attacking pace is gradual. When playing at home, Osasuna is well - adapted to the high - intensity confrontation. The midfielders are aggressive in the tackles, and they are good at disrupting the opponent's passing and ball - control system through physical contact. The home - field defense is tenacious, and the team has outstanding pressure - resistance ability.
      AH
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    • Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Osauna adopts a balanced and pragmatic style in positional attacks and defenses. Their formation is well - arranged. In the midfield, they are good at rhythm control and building defensive barriers, with a balanced offensive - defensive ratio. Their performance on the field is quite stable. The team has excellent detail control. In the last five games, they averaged 9.5 defensive blocks and 2.1 unforced errors per game. They are very reliable in controlling the situation during long - term stalemates. However, Osauna lacks individual breakthrough ability in the front - field. They rarely have moments to break the deadlock instantly. When facing a well - organized and compact defense, their efficiency in creating scoring opportunities is relatively mediocre. Levante adheres to a pragmatic competition concept of flexible counter - attacking. They actively give up inefficient ball - control in advanced positions, instead, they first tighten up their defense in the back - field, focusing o
      AH
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    • LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍
      LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍
      In this La Liga encounter, let's take a close look at the performance metrics of Osasuna and Levante. Levante has shown a stronger finishing ability. Osasuna's offensive conversion rate stands at 15% with an xG efficiency of 0.85, while Levante reaches 22% and 1.15 respectively. In terms of passing efficiency, Levante's key - pass success rate is 78%, compared to Osasuna's 65%. This indicates that Levante's passes in the front - field are more valuable and can create more threats. When it comes to midfield control, Levante has a 58% ball - possession rate and an average transition speed of 12 seconds. This allows them to effectively control the game's rhythm. The running statistics also favor Levante. They have a total running distance of 118 km and 24 high - intensity sprints, significantly better than Osasuna's 110 km and 90 sprints, showing their physical advantage. Overall, based on these data, Levante seems to have an edge in various aspects of the game. Levante's recent defensive
      AH
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    More Recommend
    • Both Kuruvchi Kokon and Bukhara have shown sub - par offensive performances recently. Their offensive conversion rates are lower than the league average, with Kuruvchi at 11.3% and Bukhara at 9.8%. The combined xG value is only 2.1, which clearly indicates inefficiency in the attacking third. In terms of key pass success rates, Kuruvchi stands at 68% while Bukhara is at 65%. The value of forward passes is 0.43 for Kuruvchi and 0.39 for Bukhara, suggesting a marginal difference between the two teams. However, both teams suffer from a lack of midfield control. Their counter - attack speed is sluggish, with an average half - time sprint distance of only 9.2 km and a high - intensity running proportion of less than 15%. I believe that only with careful analysis and sincere recommendations can we achieve long - term success in this field. The defensive statistics of this match highlight its intensity. Kuruvchi Kokan averages 14.2 tackles per game, ranking third in the league, and Bokhtar ha
      O/U
      UZB D1 Kuruvchi Kokand Qoqon - Buxoro FK
    • Both Botoșani and FK Miercurea Ciuc have relatively low offensive efficiency in the league. Their offensive conversion rates this season are only 11.2% and 9.8% respectively, far below the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, neither team has exceeded the 65% mark. Their Passing Attack Value (PA.V) in the front - field is only 0.32 and 0.28 respectively, indicating a lack of ability to create substantial threats. In midfield control, there is an obvious balance. The difference in the average number of times of regaining the ball per game (SPR) between the two teams is within 5 times. Their Conversion Possession Index (CPI) is both below 0.45, showing a lack of momentum for quick offense - defense transitions. Running data reveals a lack of high - intensity confrontation. The total average high - intensity running distance (HID) per game of both teams is less than 90 kilometers, 12% lower than the league average. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Botosani - FK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
    • Bologna has an average offensive conversion rate of 11.2% this season, lower than Lazio's 14.4%. However, Lazio's xG value of 1.8 times per game suggests that its offensive efficiency might be overestimated. In terms of key passing success rates, Bologna and Lazio have rates of 72.3% and 76.1% respectively. Lazio's front - court passing value of 0.35 is higher than Bologna's 0.28, but there is a significant difference in conversion rates. Bologna's midfield control is evident as it regains the ball 17.3 times per game on average, 2.8 more times than Lazio. Its transition attack speed is 1.4 seconds per possession, better than Lazio's 1.8 seconds. The difference in the average high - intensity sprint distance between the two teams is only 18 meters. But Bologna's total running distance of 112 km outnumbers Lazio's 99 km. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can there be long - term development. Bologna excels in the defensive department, averaging 13.6 interceptions and
      O/U
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.