Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Bologna VS Lazio

    Italy Serie A
    Analysis More Tips
    Bologna
    Bologna
    Lazio
    Lazio
    Further Reading
    • Panji Suryono
      Panji Suryono
      Bologna adopts an aggressive possession - based passing and control tactic. The team has a wide running coverage and shows strong aggression in the forward - line pressing, exerting remarkable pressure on the pitch. Bologna maintains a stable ball - possession rate of over 54% per game. The passing ratio in the front third of the field is quite impressive. They are skilled at short - range passing in small areas, constantly pulling the opponent's defense to create gaps. On average, they have 3.2 key passes per game, and their goal - creating efficiency is among the top in the league. However, the offensive - oriented tactic has its inherent drawbacks. The team lacks sufficient depth in the back - line defense. When the opponent launches a precise and rapid counter - attack, there are often lags in the defensive line's supplementary and connection. Lazio excels in a dynamic and adaptive offensive - defensive rotation strategy. It can instantly reallocate resources according to the oppon
      AH
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    • RmAtrebi
      RmAtrebi
      Bologna's home form has been a key aspect this season. Their overall win rate stands at 50%, with a balanced offensive and defensive record of 17 goals scored and 17 conceded, resulting in a goal difference of zero. They average 1.7 goals and 1.7 goals conceded per game, indicating a lack of a decisive edge in attack - defense transitions. Notably, Bologna's away form is relatively weak. Their away win rate is only 42.8%, having scored 13 and conceded 14 goals away from home, with a negative goal difference of - 1. This contrasts sharply with the stability they show when playing at home. Additionally, their average of 2.29 corner kicks and 0.7 yellow cards per game suggests a relatively steady game rhythm, yet their offensive efficiency needs improvement. On the other hand, Lazio has shown a stronger competitive edge. They have an overall win rate of 60%, with a more prominent attacking firepower. They've scored 18 goals and conceded 16, resulting in a positive goal - difference of +2.
      O/U
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    • Boris Moscoso
      Boris Moscoso Won 5/6
      Both Bologna and Lazio have had inconsistent recent forms. Bologna has been alternating wins and losses in friendlies, but they ended last season with consecutive wins over strong opponents in Serie A, which boosted their morale. On the other hand, Lazio suffered a set - back after being eliminated by a lower - league team in the Italian Cup, which has likely affected their psychology. In terms of tactics, Bologna focuses on ball - control and attacking down the left wing. Lazio, however, is good at through - balls and long - range shots, but their weakness in defending the flanks could be exploited by Bologna. Bologna will be without their central - back Casale, which may affect the height of their defensive line and the coordination in offside traps. Lazio's injury situation is even more serious, with multiple players including central - backs, midfielders, and wingers out. This limits their tactical rotation and reduces the stability of their defense. Looking at the head - to - head
      AH
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    More Recommend
    • Both Kuruvchi Kokon and Bukhara have shown sub - par offensive performances recently. Their offensive conversion rates are lower than the league average, with Kuruvchi at 11.3% and Bukhara at 9.8%. The combined xG value is only 2.1, which clearly indicates inefficiency in the attacking third. In terms of key pass success rates, Kuruvchi stands at 68% while Bukhara is at 65%. The value of forward passes is 0.43 for Kuruvchi and 0.39 for Bukhara, suggesting a marginal difference between the two teams. However, both teams suffer from a lack of midfield control. Their counter - attack speed is sluggish, with an average half - time sprint distance of only 9.2 km and a high - intensity running proportion of less than 15%. I believe that only with careful analysis and sincere recommendations can we achieve long - term success in this field. The defensive statistics of this match highlight its intensity. Kuruvchi Kokan averages 14.2 tackles per game, ranking third in the league, and Bokhtar ha
      O/U
      UZB D1 Kuruvchi Kokand Qoqon - Buxoro FK
    • Both Botoșani and FK Miercurea Ciuc have relatively low offensive efficiency in the league. Their offensive conversion rates this season are only 11.2% and 9.8% respectively, far below the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, neither team has exceeded the 65% mark. Their Passing Attack Value (PA.V) in the front - field is only 0.32 and 0.28 respectively, indicating a lack of ability to create substantial threats. In midfield control, there is an obvious balance. The difference in the average number of times of regaining the ball per game (SPR) between the two teams is within 5 times. Their Conversion Possession Index (CPI) is both below 0.45, showing a lack of momentum for quick offense - defense transitions. Running data reveals a lack of high - intensity confrontation. The total average high - intensity running distance (HID) per game of both teams is less than 90 kilometers, 12% lower than the league average. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Botosani - FK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
    • Malmo has been in good form recently, with an average offensive conversion rate of 18.2%, higher than Örgryte's 15.7%. In addition, their expected goals (xG) values this season are 1.8 and 1.6 respectively. Malmo also leads in key pass success rate at 82%, 8% higher than Örgryte. The value of Malmo's forward passes reaches 0.45 per pass, while Örgryte's is 0.38. In terms of midfield control, Malmo regains possession of the ball 15.3 times per game on average, compared to Örgryte's 13.1 times. However, Örgryte has a faster counter - attack speed, with an average counter - attack time of only 9.2 seconds. Both teams have run over 110 kilometers in the last 5 games, and the total number of high - intensity sprints per game reaches 42, indicating a fast - paced game. I believe that only by making careful and dedicated predictions can we achieve long - term development. Malmo shows a defensive style that leans towards proactive interception. Their defensive data reveals an average of 1
      O/U
      SWE D1 Malmo FF - Djurgardens
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.