Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Mbah_tipsterFollow90.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 11Tips 1.77Avg Odds -
2
Ingram⚪🔴Won 9/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 20Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
mata jalyWon 6/7Follow81.8%Win Rate +34.6%ROI 22Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
4
PhilegrayWon 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +31.6%ROI 30Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
5
OssOssOssWon 9/10Follow78.9%Win Rate +41%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
Justinus LhaksanWon 7/8Follow76.9%Win Rate +39.8%ROI 27Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
The historical head - to - head records between River Plate and Sarmiento in the Argentine Primera División are quite rich.
In the last five official matches, River Plate has a home record of 2 wins and 1 draw. They had a 4 - 1 victory, a 1 - 1 draw and a dominant 5 - 0 win. This shows their offensive power at home, especially in the 5 - 0 win, which demonstrated their strong attacking capabilities. In fact, in the last three home games, they averaged over 3.3 goals per match.
On the other hand, Sarmiento has 2 wins and 3 draws at their home ground. They've managed victories and draws against River Plate in different encounters, proving their competitiveness on their own turf.
In the Copa Libertadores, there was a 0 - 0 draw and a 1 - 0 win for Sarmiento. These results add another layer to their competitive relationship. Overall, both teams have shown their strengths in different settings, and this history will surely influence the upcoming match.
Further Reading
-
El CapitanIn comparing the offensive and defensive data between River Plate and Sarmiento, River Plate shows an edge in offensive conversion rate, with 18.2% compared to Sarmiento's 14.4%. However, Sarmiento is more efficient in xG, with a value of 1.2 against River Plate's 0.9. In terms of key passes, River Plate has a significant advantage. Its key pass success rate stands at 67%, notably higher than Sarmiento's 52%. Also, River Plate leads in the value of forward passes, with a figure of 3.8 compared to Sarmiento's 2.4. Defensively, Sarmiento outperforms River Plate in midfield interceptions. Sarmiento has 12 interceptions, while River Plate only manages 8. But when it comes to physical performance, River Plate takes the lead. The team covers a total running distance of 118km and records 42 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Sarmiento. Sarmiento has had a poor run in their last four home matches in the Argentine Primera División, with a record of just 1 win and 3 losses. TheyAH
ARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
Pi314River Plate has shown a dominant performance in recent matches. In the last five games, River Plate averaged 18.2 offensive terminations per game, with a conversion rate of 12.3%, which is significantly better than Sarsfield's 9.8%. In terms of xG efficiency, River Plate reached 1.82, while Sarsfield only managed 1.35. The key pass success rate also favors River Plate, at 42% compared to Sarsfield's 35%. The value of forward passes for River Plate is 1.72, 35% higher than Sarsfield's 1.28. When it comes to midfield control, River Plate averages 14.6 tackles and 9.2 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, superior to Sarsfield's 2.3 seconds. In terms of running distance, River Plate covers 118.3 km per game, more than Sarsfield's 109.4 km. The number of high - intensity sprints for River Plate is 58 times, 33% more than Sarsfield's 42 times. On the defensive end, River Plate makes 12.4 clearances per game, while Sarsfield only makes 9.1. Overall, RiAHARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
Jogo BonitoRiver Plate's recent home performances have shown a significant imbalance between attack and defense, with a particular vulnerability in the set - piece defense, especially during corner kicks. The lopsided corner - kick ratio of 10 - 4 in their home defeat to Rosario Central highlighted the serious flaws in their set - piece defense. Similarly, the 3 - 1 corner - kick count in the loss to Barracas Central also indicated the defensive pressure they faced from corner kicks. Even in their 2 - 0 home victory over Argentinos Juniors, the 2 - 4 corner - kick disadvantage suggested that their attack was highly reliant on converting corner kicks into goals. In their last three home games, River Plate has one win, one draw, and one loss, conceding an average of 1.0 goals per game and facing an average of 7.0 corner kicks against them. The 9 - 2 corner - kick ratio in their 1 - 3 loss to Aldosivi in the Argentine Cup and the 2 - 2 corner - kick count in their goalless draw with Santa Fe in theO/UARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
ARG D1
