Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Ingram⚪🔴Follow87.5%Win Rate +55.2%ROI 18Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Francis JumbaWon 6/7Follow80%Win Rate +47%ROI 20Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
Funny MemesFollow80%Win Rate +36.9%ROI 10Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
mata jalyWon 12/14Follow78.9%Win Rate +30.6%ROI 19Tips 1.76Avg Odds -
5
PhilegrayFollow78.6%Win Rate +28.2%ROI 28Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Football 24/7Follow77.3%Win Rate +39%ROI 23Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Boris Moscoso Won 9/11Both teams are in the lower half of the league and are engaged in a crucial battle for points. With equal scores, each side aims to defeat the other to create a gap in the standings. The offensive efficiency of the strikers on both sides should be closely monitored. Pay attention to the chances from wing attacks, counter - attacks, and set - pieces. Also, keep an eye on defensive mistakes of the two teams. The tempo of the game will directly impact the total number of goals scored in the match. A fast - paced game may lead to more goal - scoring opportunities, while a slow - paced game could result in fewer goals.O/U
MLS
Austin FC
1-1
Philadelphia Union
88 -
Olusegun10Austin, playing at home in this MLS game, adopts a 4 - 3 - 3 formation. They have an average home - field ball possession rate of 51% and a passing success rate of 80%. On average, they complete 12 shots per game. They rely on front - court pressing to drive flanking attacks. Their main scoring methods are through flank penetrations and second - phase attacks from corner kicks. The home - team's offensive output is stable. However, their full - backs tend to advance significantly, leaving obvious gaps behind them. They face great pressure when covering for counter - attacks with speed. On the other hand, Philadelphia Union plays a 3 - 4 - 2 - 1 three - center - back system in away games. They hold the ball for about 45% of the time on the road. Their wing - backs have strong running ability and are good at midfield interceptions to initiate counter - attacks. Nevertheless, the stability of their away - game defense is inconsistent. The flanks of their defense can easily be stretched reO/UMLS
Austin FC
1-1
Philadelphia Union
-
Kei R🐉Austin FC, playing at home, has a decent home - ground scoring ability. Their recent away win against the Seattle Sounders has boosted their morale. However, they have to juggle the League Cup schedule, which has taken a toll on their physical condition. Midfielder Wolf is out with an ankle injury, and there are multiple players on the defensive line sidelined. This lack of depth in defensive rotation is a concern. While their offensive end has the ability to make incursions, their defensive stability fluctuates. They aim to secure points at home to solidify their standing in the league. On the other hand, the Philadelphia Union has seen an upturn in form since the change of coach. They drew with Inter Miami in the last round and have remained undefeated in all competitions. Nevertheless, their away performance has been poor, with many losses on the road and significant defensive loopholes. In this game, midfielder Sullivan is serving a red - card suspension, affecting the midfield rotAHMLS
Austin FC
1-1
Philadelphia Union
MLS
More Recommend
-
I've conducted in - depth research on football matches and made a super - selective analysis. In the performance comparison between Los Angeles FC and Portland Timbers, the latter shows significant advantages. Portland Timbers have an average of 4.2 shots on target per game in their last 5 matches, with a conversion rate of 18.3%, which is better than Los Angeles FC's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of Portland Timbers reaches 0.72, while that of Los Angeles FC is only 0.55. In terms of passing, Portland Timbers' key - pass success rate is 68%, leading Los Angeles FC. The value of their forward - field passes is 11.3 times per 90 minutes. They also have a 61% midfield ball - possession rate compared to Los Angeles FC's 54%, and their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster per possession. In terms of physical performance, the whole team of Portland Timbers runs 112.3 km and has 42 high - intensity sprints, both of which are higher than those of Los Angeles FC. On the defensive end, Portland TiAHMLS
Los Angeles FC
-
Portland Timbers
-
I specialize in match analysis and offer top - notch selections. In this Romanian League encounter, Cluj shows a significant edge over Universitatea Cluj. Offensively, Cluj's conversion rate at the final third is 12% higher than its opponent. The xG value stands at 1.8 compared to 0.9. With a key passing success rate of 78%, it leads the league. The value of forward passes is 12.3 against 8.6. Defensively, Cluj has 15 midfield interceptions compared to 9 of its rival. It also covers 2.1 kilometers more in high - intensity sprints. With 12 tackles and 8 interceptions, its defensive statistics are comprehensively superior. The total running distance of Cluj is 112.4 kilometers, ahead of 108.6 kilometers of the opponent, indicating better physical reserves. In the back - field, Cluj has 7 clearances, suppressing the opponent's 4, which shows stronger defensive stability. Moreover, Cluj's shot - on - target rate is 45%, far exceeding the away team's 28%. The conversion rate of scoring oppoAH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post