Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> SUNYANI MAYOR🦉🎶>

    Egnatia VS Lillestrom

    UEFA Europa League
    Analysis More Tips
    Egnatia
    Egnatia 0
    0 Lillestrom
    Lillestrom
    Further Reading
    • amvn
      amvn Won 9/12
      I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. I've tailored a long - term, top - notch product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive efficiency, Egnaatia has an offensive conversion rate of 18%, which is lower than Lillestrøm's 24%. Lillestrøm also has a better xG efficiency of 1.3 compared to the home team's 1.0. When it comes to key passing, Lillestrøm has a 72% success rate in key passes, leading Egnaatia's 61%. The value of their forward passes is 1.8, posing a greater threat than Egnaatia's 1.2. In midfield control, Lillestrøm averages 5.2 tackles per game, better than the home team's 3.8. Their total running distance is 112 km, 7% more than the home team. In terms of high - intensity sprints, Lillestrøm has 112 sprints, while the home team only has 89, showing a clear physical advantage.
      AH
      UEFA EL Egnatia 0-0 Lillestrom
    • Americas Time
      Americas Time
      Egnatia has shown strong offensive firepower in European competitions. In their last 10 matches across all competitions, they've achieved 6 wins, 3 draws, and 1 loss, with a win - rate of 60% and an average of nearly 2 goals per game. However, the new season of the Albanian League hasn't started yet. So, while they may have an edge in physical fitness, their match rhythm might be inferior to their opponents. Lillestrøm is in the thick of the Norwegian Premier League. After 17 league rounds, they've got 8 wins, 2 draws, and 7 losses, ranking 5th on the points table. They've earned 14 points away from home, placing 4th in the league for away - game performance, indicating a certain ability to play well on the road. Nevertheless, in their last 6 league rounds, they've only had 2 wins, 1 draw, and 3 losses, with a significant dip in form. Their defense has conceded 10 goals in the last 6 games, raising concerns about their defensive focus. There's no previous head - to - head record betwe
      O/U
      UEFA EL Egnatia 0-0 Lillestrom
    • CouprieJR
      CouprieJR
      Egnatia has shown a significant home - field advantage in Europa Cup home games. This season, their home win - rate is as high as 75%. They score an average of 4 goals per game while conceding only 1.25 goals, with both offensive and defensive efficiency far exceeding the league average. In terms of specific data, in home games, the team has scored a total of 16 goals and conceded only 5, with a goal difference of 11. This shows their strong offensive firepower and a solid defense system. Looking at their overall performance, Egnatia has a 60% win - rate in all competitions. They average 2.7 goals per game and 3.7 corner kicks per game, demonstrating outstanding tactical execution and ball - control ability. Their style combines fast counter - attacks with a solid defense. The average of 2.9 yellow cards per game also reflects their high - intensity competitive state, which provides a strong foundation for their dominant home performance. The home atmosphere and tactical stability make
      O/U
      UEFA EL Egnatia 0-0 Lillestrom
    More Recommend
    • Montréal is in good form at home. They adopt a 4-3-2-1 formation. On average, they have 47% ball possession and a 79% pass success rate at home. They complete 13 shots per game, creating threats through wing attacks and short passes in the middle. Set - pieces are their main scoring method. Although Montréal has a decent offensive output at home, their defensive line lacks integrity. When the full - backs push forward, there are obvious gaps behind them, and they struggle to cover in case of a quick counter - attack. On the other hand, Los Angeles Galaxy plays 4-4-2 away. They have 48% ball possession on the road, and their midfield has good passing ability. They are good at advancing step - by - step in positional play. However, there are some injured and suspended players in the team, which causes fluctuations in the stability of their away defense. The midfield battle will be crucial as it will determine the quality of both teams' ball - distribution. Montréal's home - field adva
      AH
      MLS CF Montreal - Los Angeles Galaxy
    • Charlotte plays at home, adopting a 4-2-3-1 formation. They have an average home ball possession rate of 50% and a passing success rate of 81%. Relying on midfield control, they conduct flanking transfers. Their main scoring methods are through flank penetration and set-pieces. Their ability to earn points at home is decent. However, the team has obvious defensive weaknesses. Their clean - sheet rate is not high. When the full - backs push forward, there are large gaps behind them, and they face significant pressure in covering positions when dealing with fast counter - attacks. On the other hand, D.C. United plays a compact defensive style away from home. They have an away ball possession rate of 44%. They rely on midfield interceptions to disrupt the opponent's play and launch long - ball counter - attacks after winning the ball. But they have many defensive loopholes on the road, and the coordination of their back - line fluctuates. The midfield battle will directly determine the qu
      AH
      MLS Charlotte FC - DC United
    • Cincinnati plays at home, deploying a 3-4-1-2 formation. They average 49% ball possession at home and have an 81% pass success rate. They rely on the full - backs pushing forward to create width, and through - balls in the flanks and set - pieces are their main scoring methods. Their home offensive output is sufficient, and the team's competitive state is on the upswing. However, there are hidden dangers in their defensive coordination. When the full - backs charge forward, there are large gaps behind them, increasing the pressure on defensive cover when facing fast counter - attacks. On the other hand, Seattle Sounders play a 4-2-3-1 formation away from home, with 45% ball possession. They are good at launching counter - attacks after midfield interceptions, and their attacks on the wings are quite threatening. Nevertheless, they are in a slump recently. When facing continuous pressure on the road, their flank defense is prone to exposing vulnerabilities. The midfield battle will dete
      AH
      MLS FC Cincinnati - Seattle Sounders
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.