Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Sup_99>

    Chicago Fire VS Portland Timbers

    USA Major League Soccer
    Analysis More Tips
    Chicago Fire
    Chicago Fire 2
    1 Portland Timbers
    Portland Timbers
    Further Reading
    • Win bets
      Win bets Won 7/10
      Chicago Fire has shown a strong performance at home this season. In their last five home games, they achieved four wins and one loss, boasting an 80% win - rate. They scored an average of 2 goals per game and conceded 6 in total over these 5 games, with a positive goal difference of 4. The team is efficient at both ends of the pitch. They average 5.09 corner kicks per game, which reflects their stable tactical execution. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has been struggling on the road. In their last five away matches, they only managed one win, one draw and three losses, resulting in a win - rate of just 25%. They conceded as many as 8 goals, indicating obvious weaknesses in their defense. In their head - to - head encounters this season, Chicago Fire held a clear advantage at home. A data comparison shows that both teams have similar offensive firepower. Chicago Fire scores 2.0 goals per game at home, the same as Portland Timbers' average away goals. However, there is a significant
      O/U
      MLS Chicago Fire 2-1 Portland Timbers
    • Liam 665
      Liam 665
      The Chicago Fire and the Portland Timbers both show inefficiency in their offensive ends. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, lower than the league average, while the Timbers' xG efficiency is only 0.62 per 90 minutes. In terms of key passes, neither team has a success rate exceeding 45%. The value of their forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. Regarding midfield control, the Fire have an average ball - possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute. In contrast, the Timbers have a faster transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. In terms of running, the Fire cover a distance of 118 km and have 12 high - intensity sprints. However, in defense, their tackle rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams waste scoring opportunities. Their on - target shooting rate is only 24%, and the total xG is only 1.8
      AH
      MLS Chicago Fire 2-1 Portland Timbers
    • The Chelsea Verdict
      The Chelsea Verdict
      The Chicago Fire shows a better offensive performance compared to the Portland Timbers. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, superior to the Timbers' 9.8%. The xG efficiency of the Fire reaches 1.82, while the Timbers only achieve 1.21. In terms of the success rate of key forward passes, the Fire leads with 67%, compared to the Timbers' 58%. The value of forward passes for the Fire is 14.2, more threatening than the Timbers' 9.6. Regarding midfield control data, the Fire averages 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game, 20% more than the Timbers. The Fire also outperforms in terms of running distance and high - intensity sprints. They cover 112.3 km in a whole game and have 47 high - intensity sprints, higher than the Timbers' 108.1 km and 39 sprints. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. In the defensive data comparison, Chicago Fire has 11.2 tackles per game and 8.4 interceptions, a 20% improvement over Portland Timbers. Their h
      O/U
      MLS Chicago Fire 2-1 Portland Timbers
    More Recommend
    • Santa Fe has had a relatively good recent form, winning 6, drawing 3, and losing only 1 in their last 10 matches. However, this hasn't significantly changed their situation in the competition. On the other hand, River Plate's form has been mediocre. They've won 2, drawn 2, and lost 6 in their last 10 games. The team lacks quality wingers, relying mainly on central penetration, which is their main attacking threat. Also, they don't have a strikingly powerful forward, resulting in a relatively weak scoring ability. Santa Fe has a decent attacking force. Although River Plate's defense has improved to some extent and their forwards have good scoring capabilities, they are still at a disadvantage in terms of overall strength and historical head - to - head records. Their major problem lies in a poor back - line. In this game, Santa Fe is eager to secure a victory and has been performing well. Despite Santa Fe having an obvious edge in strength on paper, the game has been quite evenly matche
      AH
      CON CSA Independiente Santa Fe - River Plate
    • Pereira has shown a decent offensive ability in recent games. In their last 10 matches, they've won 3, drawn 4, and lost 3. They've managed to score in almost every game, which indicates a good attacking form. On the other hand, Santa Fe's performance has been a bit inconsistent. They've won 5, drawn 4, and lost 1 in their past 10 games. Although they've had a relatively good record, their recent form has been poor. They rely heavily on home - field advantage to pick up points. In the last two games, they've failed to win, with the most recent match ending in a draw. This shows that their momentum in getting points is on the decline. Both teams have strong motivation as every game is crucial for their current standings. Pereira seems to be more resilient and is good at engaging in long - drawn - out battles against opponents. Also, the number of goals in their recent games has been quite reliable. It remains to be seen whether Pereira can continue their good performance in this match o
      AH
      COL D1 Deportivo Pereira Postp. Independiente Santa Fe
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.