Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaFollow70.4%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
MetaMaskChicago Fire has shown decent form, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches with 3 losses and no draws. However, it's worth noting that two of their victories were achieved at home, indicating a certain home - field advantage. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has won 5, drawn 2 and lost 3 in their last 10 games. The inconsistent performance of Portland Timbers can be attributed to the players' psychological state and form. In previous encounters, Chicago Fire held an edge. But recently, they've had a few lackluster performances. Their defense has been out of sync, which puts them at a disadvantage. Portland Timbers' forwards have been underwhelming, clearly not performing as well as Chicago Fire. Although Chicago Fire has a better win - loss record in the recent 10 - game span, they don't hold a significant advantage in this upcoming match. As the two teams meet again, it remains to be seen which side can maintain a normal level of play and seize the initiative in this game. The ChicO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
amvnI'm a professional analyst with a long - term and stable track record. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive performance, Chicago Fire has a better conversion rate at 18.3%, compared to Portland Timbers' 14.1%. The xG efficiency of Chicago Fire is 1.23, while that of Portland Timbers is only 0.91, which clearly shows the former's superiority in the attacking third. When it comes to passing, Chicago Fire has a key passing success rate of 62%, leading Portland Timbers' 55%. The value of their forward passes is 14.7, more efficient than Portland's 11.3. In midfield control, Chicago Fire has an average of 12.4 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Portland Timbers' 2.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Chicago Fire covers a distance of 112.3 km per game, more than Portland Timbers' 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 43 for Chicago Fire and 37 for PortlanO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Kei R🐉 Won 8/10The Chicago Fire is in great form, winning multiple games recently. They're highly motivated in the playoff - spot race. At home, their offense is consistent. The midfield has good ball - control and can effectively organize attacks. The wingers' runs create numerous goal - scoring opportunities. However, the defense is troubled by injuries. Some key defenders are unavailable, and the reshuffled backline is less stable. They'll face pressure when dealing with opponents' quick counter - attacks. The Portland Timbers are on the verge of the Western Conference playoffs, so they're desperate for points. Their attack is fairly potent, mainly relying on wingers' darts and counter - attacks to score. But their away - game performance is inconsistent. There are many defensive flaws on the road, and issues often arise in coordinated defending and covering. Overall, their ability to pick up points away from home is mediocre.AHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post