Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaFollow70.4%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
The Chicago Fire is in great form, winning multiple games recently. They're highly motivated in the playoff - spot race. At home, their offense is consistent. The midfield has good ball - control and can effectively organize attacks. The wingers' runs create numerous goal - scoring opportunities. However, the defense is troubled by injuries. Some key defenders are unavailable, and the reshuffled backline is less stable. They'll face pressure when dealing with opponents' quick counter - attacks.
The Portland Timbers are on the verge of the Western Conference playoffs, so they're desperate for points. Their attack is fairly potent, mainly relying on wingers' darts and counter - attacks to score. But their away - game performance is inconsistent. There are many defensive flaws on the road, and issues often arise in coordinated defending and covering. Overall, their ability to pick up points away from home is mediocre.
Further Reading
-
MetaMaskChicago Fire has shown decent form, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches with 3 losses and no draws. However, it's worth noting that two of their victories were achieved at home, indicating a certain home - field advantage. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has won 5, drawn 2 and lost 3 in their last 10 games. The inconsistent performance of Portland Timbers can be attributed to the players' psychological state and form. In previous encounters, Chicago Fire held an edge. But recently, they've had a few lackluster performances. Their defense has been out of sync, which puts them at a disadvantage. Portland Timbers' forwards have been underwhelming, clearly not performing as well as Chicago Fire. Although Chicago Fire has a better win - loss record in the recent 10 - game span, they don't hold a significant advantage in this upcoming match. As the two teams meet again, it remains to be seen which side can maintain a normal level of play and seize the initiative in this game. The ChicO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
ONUKE IFEANYILooking at the head - to - head history between Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers, the two teams have met multiple times in Major League Soccer (MLS) games and friendly matches. In recent encounters, draws have been the norm. In a past MLS game, Chicago Fire managed a 2 - 1 home victory over Portland Timbers, which was their only win in the last three home meetings against this opponent. However, in a club friendly, Chicago Fire lost 3 - 4 at home, indicating some volatility in their defensive performance. In official home games against Portland Timbers, Chicago Fire had a 2 - 2 draw in one match and a 1 - 1 draw in another. The corner - kick statistics are quite telling about their offensive efficiency. In one game, they led with a 7 - 2 corner - kick count, and in another, it was 10 - 5, showing a significant edge in creating offensive opportunities during these matches. Portland Timbers' away records against Chicago show fluctuations. In past away games, they had a 3 - 4 win, a 1 -O/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Liam 665The Chicago Fire and the Portland Timbers both show inefficiency in their offensive ends. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, lower than the league average, while the Timbers' xG efficiency is only 0.62 per 90 minutes. In terms of key passes, neither team has a success rate exceeding 45%. The value of their forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. Regarding midfield control, the Fire have an average ball - possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute. In contrast, the Timbers have a faster transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. In terms of running, the Fire cover a distance of 118 km and have 12 high - intensity sprints. However, in defense, their tackle rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams waste scoring opportunities. Their on - target shooting rate is only 24%, and the total xG is only 1.8AHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
