Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> u cant ans>

    Burnley VS West Ham United

    England Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Burnley
    Burnley
    West Ham United
    West Ham United
    Further Reading
    • Kombo Jnr.
      Kombo Jnr.
      Burnley's recent form has shown significant fluctuations. In the latter part of last season's Premier League, they drew 1-1 away to Wolves (0-1 at half-time) with 7-7 corners, indicating some resilience in defense. However, they then lost 0-1 to Arsenal with 3-3 corners, revealing the fragility of their defense. After the season, Burnley faced challenges in several friendlies. They lost 0-1 to Torino (7-0 corners), drew 2-2 with Espanyol (7-7 corners), and narrowly lost 3-1 to Cincinnati (5-6 corners). Statistics show that they conceded 4 goals in the last three friendlies, averaging 1.33 goals conceded per game, so the stability of their defense needs to be improved urgently. When playing at home, Burnley didn't win any matches at the end of last season (1-1 against Wolves, 2-2 against Aston Villa). Their offensive efficiency was also low. They only scored two goals in the last Premier League round when they drew 2-2 with Aston Villa, but the 2-8 corner disadvantage highlighted the im
      O/U
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    • Crypto BetMan
      Crypto BetMan
      Burnley's recent form in the EFL Championship has been dismal. This season, they've shown a poor performance, with a winless record of 0 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses. They've scored 10 goals while conceding 18, resulting in a negative goal difference of -8. Their average of 1.0 goal per game on offense is lackluster and hardly poses a real threat to opponents. In terms of defense, Burnley has major problems. In their last ten matches, they've managed only 1 draw and suffered 9 defeats. They've conceded 18 goals, an average of 1.8 goals per game, placing them among the bottom in the league. The instability of their defense needs urgent attention. When it comes to corner kicks, Burnley averages 4.7 per game, slightly more than West Ham United's 4.09. However, their low offensive efficiency means this advantage in corner - kick numbers doesn't translate into actual goals. West Ham United will likely look to capitalize on Burnley's offensive and defensive woes in this encounter. With Burnle
      AH
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    • LACOBRAAA
      LACOBRAAA
      Burnley has shown significant fluctuations in their recent form. In the Premier League towards the end of last season, they drew 1-1 away against Wolves (0-1 at half - time) with 7-7 corners, indicating some resilience in defense. However, they then lost 0-1 to Arsenal with a 3-3 corner count, revealing the vulnerability of their defense. During the off - season, Burnley faced challenges in several friendlies. They lost 0-1 to Torino (7-0 in corners), drew 2-2 with Espanyol (7-7 in corners), and narrowly lost 3-1 to Cincinnati (5-6 in corners). Statistics show that in their last three friendlies, they conceded 4 goals, averaging 1.33 goals per game. Their defensive consistency needs urgent improvement. At home, Burnley didn't win any games towards the end of last season (1-1 against Wolves and 2-2 against Aston Villa). Their offensive efficiency was also low. They only scored two goals in a 2-2 draw against Aston Villa in the last round of the Premier League, but the 2-8 corner disadva
      AH
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    More Recommend
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this football match. In the comparison between Lahti and KuPS, Lahti has an edge in offensive finishing conversion rate, standing at 18.3%, while KuPS only has 14.1%. However, in terms of the xG value, KuPS leads with 0.85, surpassing Lahti's 0.62. When it comes to key passing success rate, KuPS is ahead with 72% compared to Lahti's 65%. KuPS also shows a high - quality performance in front - court passing, with a value of 14.2 times per 90 minutes. In midfield control, KuPS is more dominant. They average 12.4 interceptions per game and have a faster transition speed of 1.8 seconds per time. In terms of physical performance, Lahti's running distance of 11.3 kilometers is slightly less than KuPS's 11.8 kilometers. Also, Lahti's high - intensity sprints number 17 times, fewer than KuPS's 21. Overall, both teams have their own advantages. Lahti is stronger in offensive finishing, but KuPS shows better performance in many aspects such as expected goals
      AH
      FIN D1 Lahti - KuPs
    • I've been meticulously researching football matches and here's my in - depth analysis. In the comparison between Kalmar and Hammarby, Kalmar shows a significant edge in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Kalmar's recent conversion rate in finishing attacks is as high as 18.3%, which is notably better than Hammarby's 14.1%. Their xG efficiency also leads by 0.24. When it comes to passing, Kalmar's success rate of key passes stands at 62%, outperforming Hammarby's 55%. The value of their forward passes is 12.7% higher. In midfield control, Kalmar has a strong presence. They average 11.2 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game. Moreover, their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than their opponents. Looking at the running statistics, the entire Kalmar team runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 32 high - intensity sprints. In contrast, Hammarby only manages 10.8 kilometers and 24 high - intensity sprints. Overall, Kalmar seems to have a better chance in this
      AH
      SWE D1 Kalmar - Hammarby
    • I specialize in match analysis and offer super selections. In the Danish Super League encounter between Randers and Copenhagen, Copenhagen demonstrates superior offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, better than Randers' 12.4%. The xG efficiency of Copenhagen is 1.32 per 90 minutes, leading Randers by 0.45. In terms of key passes, Copenhagen's success rate is 62% compared to Randers' 48%, with a 17% higher value of forward passes. Regarding midfield control, Copenhagen has an average of 14 interceptions per game, a 20% increase in transition speed, a running distance of 118 km, and 35% more high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, they have 18 tackles, 22 interceptions, and also hold an edge in clearance statistics. Copenhagen's tactical system holds a significant edge. Their midfield pressure and rapid transitions effectively control the game's tempo. The running distance of 118km and a 35% increase in high - intensity sprints ensure the quality
      AH
      DEN SASL Randers FC - FC Copenhagen
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.