Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> amvn>

    Chicago Fire VS Portland Timbers

    USA Major League Soccer
    Analysis More Tips
    Chicago Fire
    Chicago Fire
    Portland Timbers
    Portland Timbers
    I'm a professional analyst with a long - term and stable track record. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive performance, Chicago Fire has a better conversion rate at 18.3%, compared to Portland Timbers' 14.1%. The xG efficiency of Chicago Fire is 1.23, while that of Portland Timbers is only 0.91, which clearly shows the former's superiority in the attacking third. When it comes to passing, Chicago Fire has a key passing success rate of 62%, leading Portland Timbers' 55%. The value of their forward passes is 14.7, more efficient than Portland's 11.3. In midfield control, Chicago Fire has an average of 12.4 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Portland Timbers' 2.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Chicago Fire covers a distance of 112.3 km per game, more than Portland Timbers' 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 43 for Chicago Fire and 37 for Portland Timbers, indicating better physical reserves for the former. On the defensive end, Chicago Fire makes 18.2 tackles per game, more aggressive than Portland Timbers' 15.1. The clearance data of 9.4:7.6 also reflects the stability of Chicago Fire's defense line.
    Further Reading
    • Loyal08
      Loyal08
      Chicago Fire is in great form. They've been performing well recently, though they're just a mid - table team and the gap between them and their opponents isn't huge. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has a poor goal - scoring ability and isn't in top form. However, they have a good home record with few losses. This doesn't align with both teams' recent offensive and defensive performances and historical head - to - head data. In terms of the historical records, the home - field team has an edge. In this game, Chicago Fire has the home - field advantage against Portland Timbers, which has a good trend in head - to - head data. It remains to be seen which team will be able to showcase its true strength in this match. The Portland Timbers' recent form has been quite impressive. The key to their significant improvement lies in the outstanding performance of their defense. Meanwhile, the Chicago Fire has also been playing steadily in recent games, with a decent overall performance and sol
      AH
      MLS Chicago Fire - Portland Timbers
    • MetaMask
      MetaMask
      Chicago Fire has shown decent form, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches with 3 losses and no draws. However, it's worth noting that two of their victories were achieved at home, indicating a certain home - field advantage. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has won 5, drawn 2 and lost 3 in their last 10 games. The inconsistent performance of Portland Timbers can be attributed to the players' psychological state and form. In previous encounters, Chicago Fire held an edge. But recently, they've had a few lackluster performances. Their defense has been out of sync, which puts them at a disadvantage. Portland Timbers' forwards have been underwhelming, clearly not performing as well as Chicago Fire. Although Chicago Fire has a better win - loss record in the recent 10 - game span, they don't hold a significant advantage in this upcoming match. As the two teams meet again, it remains to be seen which side can maintain a normal level of play and seize the initiative in this game. The Chic
      O/U
      MLS Chicago Fire - Portland Timbers
    More Recommend
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - term and stable track record in providing quality information. I've crafted a long - term, high - quality product tailored for big players. Looking at the current situation, Colorado Rapids has shown better offensive efficiency recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, higher than Kansas City Current's 15.2%. In terms of data, the home team, Colorado Rapids, has a better passing value in the front - field, with a score of 3.2 compared to the away team's 2.6. They also hold an edge in the crucial passing success rate, 68% against Kansas City's 61%. In midfield control, Colorado averages 12.3 tackles and 8.7 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 3.8 seconds per possession, faster than Kansas City's 4.2 seconds. There's also a significant gap in running distances. The entire Colorado team averages 11.2 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints (14.4) is ahead of the away team's 11.3.
      AH
      MLS Colorado Rapids - Sporting Kansas City
    • I'm a professional analyst with long - term and stable information. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. Royal Salt Lake City has shown better performance recently. Their offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, higher than Minnesota United's 9.8%. The xG efficiency values (1.15 vs 0.92) indicate that Royal Salt Lake City poses a greater offensive threat. In terms of passing, the value of forward passes (2.8 vs 2.1) and the success rate of key passes (68% vs 55%) are in favor of Royal Salt Lake City. The midfield control is evident from the average ball possession rate (58% vs 42%) and transition speed (1.2s vs 1.6s). The running distance (112km vs 108km) and high - intensity sprints (248 times vs 198 times) also give Royal Salt Lake City an edge. All these factors suggest that Royal Salt Lake City has better overall strength in this aspect.
      AH
      MLS Real Salt Lake - Minnesota United FC
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable performance in providing quality information. I've crafted a long - term, high - quality product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive performance, Yokohama FC's offensive conversion rate is 18%, lower than Iwata's 23%. The xG efficiency of Yokohama FC is 0.78, while Iwata's is 1.02. When it comes to passing, Iwata's key passing success rate is 62%, better than Yokohama's 49%, and the value of their forward passes is 15% higher. In the midfield, Iwata has 3 more tackles, and their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster. In terms of running, the whole Iwata team runs 112 km and has 12 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Yokohama's. On the defensive end, Iwata has 14 clearances and 18 interceptions, while Yokohama only has 9 clearances. In the attacking third, Iwata's chance - taking rate is 72%, leading Yokohama's 58%. The xG comparison shows Iwata at 1.21 and Yokohama at 0.89. Overall, Iwata seems
      AH
      JPN D2 Yokohama FC - Jubilo Iwata
    Goaloo28.com
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.