Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Sevilla VS Rayo Vallecano

    Spanish La Liga
    Analysis More Tips
    Sevilla
    Sevilla
    Rayo Vallecano
    Rayo Vallecano
    Further Reading
    • Crypto BetMan
      Crypto BetMan
      Sevilla has shown distinct tactical characteristics in the 2026 summer friendlies, with corner kick statistics standing out as a core highlight. Looking back at recent matches, against NEC Nijmegen, Sevilla lost 1 - 2 but led in corner kicks 5 - 3. In the away game against Utrecht, they won 1 - 0 with an equal 3 - 3 corner kick count. When they defeated Bayer Leverkusen, the score was 2 - 1 and they had an edge in corner kicks 3 - 1. In a friendly against Ceuta on a neutral ground, Sevilla won 2 - 1 with a staggering 10 - 3 corner kick difference, which fully demonstrated the efficient execution of their set - piece tactics. In the final rounds of La Liga, Sevilla lost 2 - 3 to Villarreal. The 2 - 2 score at half - time indicated a continuous threat from their offensive end. Against Real Madrid, they lost 0 - 1, and the 0 - 1 half - time score revealed the vulnerability of their defense under high pressure. This analysis provides insights into Sevilla's performance and tactical tendenc
      O/U
      SPA D1 Sevilla - Rayo Vallecano
    • LACOBRAAA
      LACOBRAAA
      Sevilla has shown distinctive tactical features in the summer warm - up matches. The corner - kick statistics have become a key highlight. Looking back at recent matches, in the game against NEC Nijmegen, Sevilla lost 1 - 2 but led in corner kicks with a 5 - 3 score. In the away game against Utrecht, they won 1 - 0 with a 3 - 3 tie in corner kicks. Against Bayer Leverkusen, they triumphed 2 - 1 and had an advantage in corner kicks with a 3 - 1 score. In the friendly match against Ceuta on a neutral ground, Sevilla won 2 - 1, and the huge gap in corner kicks (10 - 3) fully demonstrated the efficient implementation of their set - piece tactics. In the last rounds of La Liga, in the game against Villarreal, Sevilla lost 2 - 3. The 2 - 2 score at half - time indicated a continuous threat from their offensive end. Against Real Madrid, they lost 0 - 1, and the 0 - 1 score at half - time revealed the vulnerability of their defense under high pressure. Also, they defeated Torremolinos Juvenil
      AH
      SPA D1 Sevilla - Rayo Vallecano
    • altpzzy
      altpzzy
      Sevilla sits in the upper echelons of the league. They boast a luxurious squad with ample depth on the bench and rich experience in major competitions, making their overall competitiveness on the pitch quite prominent. In their last twenty matches across all competitions, they've achieved 11 wins, 5 draws, and 4 losses. Their offensive and defensive systems are well - established. They have a variety of offensive plays and high - level defensive coordination. At home, Sevilla is dominant. They are good at using high - pressing tactics combined with flanking attacks. Their front - line players apply intense pressure, creating a strong sense of oppression on the field. The midfield core, Suso, has an extremely sharp passing vision and excellent rhythm control. He can accurately deliver all kinds of threatening passes, enlivening the front - line attacks and connecting the whole team's offensive plays. Up front, players like Rafa and Mir are reliable finishers. Barcelona lies in the middl
      AH
      SPA D1 Sevilla - Rayo Vallecano
    More Recommend
    • KFUM Oslo has been in a state where their offensive performance shows both quantity and inefficiency. In their recent five matches, they averaged 12.3 offensive terminations per game, yet their conversion rate was only 11%. On the other hand, Lillestrøm has a much better offensive efficiency. Their offensive termination conversion rate of 15% ranks third in the Norwegian Premier League. In terms of key passes, the success rate of KFUM Oslo is 62%, which is significantly lower than Lillestrøm's 71%, and the difference in the value of forward passes is as high as 1.8. In midfield control, Lillestrøm holds a clear lead with a 61% possession rate and a transition speed of 12.4 meters per minute. In terms of physical exertion, the visiting team, Lillestrøm, runs a total of 118 km during the game and makes 23 high - intensity sprints, 4 more than the home team. Defensively, Lillestrøm outperforms KFUM Oslo across the board. They record 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. In
      AH
      NOR D1 KFUM Oslo - Lillestrom
    • Maryport has shown greater efficiency at the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, outperforming Seinäjoki's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.3, 0.5 higher than the opponent. In terms of the passing network, Maryport is more efficient. Their key - passing success rate is 42%, leading Seinäjoki's 30%. The value of forward passes is 1.8 compared to Seinäjoki's 0.9, posing a greater threat. In midfield control, Maryport also has the upper hand. They average 11 tackles and 8 interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds on average, faster than Seinäjoki. The whole team of Maryport runs a total distance of 112 km and has 45 high - intensity sprints, indicating more abundant physical reserves. Overall, Maryport seems to have more advantages in this game, and their performance is worth looking forward to. Mariehamn shows greater resilience in their defensive system. They average 14 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 7 clearances per game. Their intercept
      AH
      FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - SJK Seinajoen
    • Alavés holds an edge over Getafe in several key offensive metrics. Their attack conversion rate stands at 18.6%, compared to Getafe's 14.3%. The xG efficiency of Alavés is 1.21, while Getafe lags behind at 0.98. In terms of passing in the front - field, Alavés has a higher passing value (4.7) than Getafe's 3.2. The key passing success rate of Alavés is 62%, outperforming Getafe's 51%. In the midfield, Alavés shows more stability. They have a 58% ball - possession rate and a conversion speed of 8.2 times per 90 minutes. Looking at the whole - team performance, Alavés runs more. Their total running distance is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 89 times, both higher than Getafe's figures. On the defensive end, Alavés is also more active. They have 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and 18 clearances, while Getafe only manages 12 clearances. Overall, based on these statistics, Alavés seems to be in a better position in this encounter. I invite you to follow me a
      AH
      SPA D1 Alaves - Getafe
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.