Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Battle New
VS
Home
AH
Away
Over
O/U
Under
More Matches
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 7/8Follow87.5%Win Rate +54.7%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
PhilegrayFollow85%Win Rate +37.7%ROI 20Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
3
Suyash.Won 7/8Follow81.8%Win Rate +50.3%ROI 12Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Light of your world 🔥Won 12/15Follow80%Win Rate +44.6%ROI 15Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
RossyGFollow80%Win Rate +17.7%ROI 10Tips 1.48Avg Odds -
6
Olayori.Follow78.9%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 20Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Abule Won 6/9Rio Ave vs Porto ⚽🔥 TEAMS ANALYSIS Rio Ave welcome Porto in an important league encounter, with the hosts looking for a response while the visitors aim to continue their strong domestic form. Who is likely to come out on top is what this clash will reveal. Porto 1–0 Rio Ave was the outcome of their previous meeting, with Porto winning the large majority of the historical head-to-head meetings between the two clubs.1x2
POR D1
Rio Ave
-
FC Porto
88 -
The Chelsea VerdictIn this Portuguese Primeira Liga encounter, let's take a look at the key aspects between Rio Ave and Porto. Porto has a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Rio Ave's offensive conversion rate is only 12%, while Porto's reaches 18%, and the latter's expected goals (xG) value is 0.6 higher. In terms of passing, Porto's key - pass success rate stands at 72%, better than Rio Ave's 58%. The value of Porto's forward passes is 1.2 higher. In midfield control, Porto holds a 61% possession rate. Their transition speed of 14 times per minute is also superior to Rio Ave's 11 times. When it comes to physical performance, the total running distance of Porto is 118 km with 43 high - intensity sprints. Rio Ave, on the other hand, has to maintain the rhythm of the game with a 122 - km physical exertion. I can provide you with precise analysis and recommendations for daily matches, so stay tuned for more information. Porto has shown greater defensive pressure. Their statistics of 19 tackles, 14 interceO/UPOR D1
Rio Ave
-
FC Porto
-
Philosopher TipsTeam analysis Porto enter with strong form: 4W-0D-1L in last 5, avg 1.2-0.4 goals, solid defense conceding 0.3/match at home. Key absences: Bednarek, Samu, Varela. Rio Ave struggle: 0 wins in 6, 4 goals in 5 games, but score regularly. H2H heavily favors Porto: 43 wins in 62 meetings.O/UPOR D1
Rio Ave
-
FC Porto
68
POR D1
More Recommend
-
I've carefully studied the matches and made super selections. Norwich has been in excellent form recently. Their average shooting accuracy rate of 18.3% leads the Championship. Their xG value stands at 1.24, 0.32 higher than West Bromwich Albion. The success rate of their key passes is 67%, 12 percentage points higher than that of their opponents. Their attacking pass value (PPV) reaches 4.8 times per 90 minutes. In midfield interception, Norwich has 14.2 times per game, better than the away team's 9.4 times. Their transition speed (TSP) is 1.8 times per minute, which gives them an edge. The total running distance of the whole team is 113.6 km per game, ranking among the top three in the league. The number of high - intensity sprints per game is 23.7, the highest in the Championship. On the defensive end, their tackles per game are 10.1 and interceptions are 15.8, both ranking among the top. Their clearance efficiency reaches 72%. Norwich boasts a remarkable offensive system, holding sAH
ENG LCH
Norwich City
-
West Bromwich(WBA)
-
I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of recent performance, the offensive end conversion rate of Sparta Prague is 18.3% per game, which is higher than Teplice's 14.1%. The xG value of 1.84 for Sparta Prague against Teplice's 1.21 also reflects Sparta Prague's offensive advantage. There is a significant difference in the value of forward passes. Sparta Prague has 72.6 effective passes per 90 minutes, while Teplice only has 58.3. The success rate of key passes is 61% for Sparta Prague and 49% for Teplice. In midfield control, Sparta Prague has an average of 12.4 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game. The conversion speed is 1.7 seconds per time, better than Teplice's 2.3 seconds. In terms of running distance, Sparta Prague runs 112.3 km per game, 8.6 km more than Teplice. The number of high - intensity sprints is 17.2 for Sparta Prague and 12.4 for Teplice. Overall, Sparta Prague shows better performance in multiple aspects. Sparta Prague has been in a strong formAH
CZE D1
AC Sparta Prague
-
Teplice
-
I'm a professional who has been carefully researching football matches and making top - notch selections. Let's take a look at the performance of these two teams. Caspasa has an average of 4.2 shots on target per game in recent five games, but its conversion rate is only 12%. Trabzonspor, on the other hand, has an xG value of 1.8, higher than Caspasa's 1.3. In terms of passing, Caspasa's key passing success rate of 61% is behind Trabzonspor's 72%, and the difference in the value of forward passes is up to 15%. In midfield battles, Trabzonspor has an average of 9.4 interceptions per game, 2.1 more than Caspasa. And its attack - defense transition speed leads by 12%. In terms of physical performance, the away team, Trabzonspor, has 18 high - intensity sprints in a game, 5 more than the home team. Their running distance also exceeds Caspasa's by 800 meters. On the defensive end, Trabzonspor has 12.3 tackles per game and a clearance efficiency of 78%, which is better than Caspasa's 65%. OvAH
TUR D1
Kasimpasa
-
Trabzonspor
ENG LCH
CZE D1
TUR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post