Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Rosenborg BK VS Viking

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Rosenborg BK
    Rosenborg BK
    Viking
    Viking
    Further Reading
    • Olayori.
      Olayori.
      Viking, playing away, is one of the hottest teams in the Norwegian Premier League this season. The team's overall competitive level remains at the top in the league, and it has long been in the title - contending group at the upper reaches of the league standings, making it a strong contender for the league championship this season. Recently, the team has shown extremely stable performance in various competitions, with a high winning rate. Whether at home or away, it can maintain efficient offense and defense, and rarely experiences consecutive losses or slumps. The offensive end is Viking's core strength. The team has a mature and three - dimensional offensive system. The wingers have extremely fast attacking speed, the midfielders are outstanding in interpenetration and advancement, and the forwards are highly stable in goal - scoring. The average number of goals per game ranks among the top in the league, indicating a top - notch offensive firepower in the league. In terms of defens
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    • The Chelsea Verdict
      The Chelsea Verdict
      Rosenborg has an edge in offensive conversion rate, standing at 18.3% compared to Viking's 15.1%. Their xG efficiency is also better, with 0.78 against Viking's 0.62. On the other hand, Viking leads in key pass success rate, achieving 62% while Rosenborg only manages 55%. However, in terms of the value of forward passes, Viking's 14.2 is marginally lower than Rosenborg's 12.6. In midfield control, Viking outperforms Rosenborg. They average 12.4 tackles and 9.1 interceptions per game, higher than Rosenborg's 9.8 and 7.3 respectively. In terms of physical performance, Viking has covered 118.3 kilometers in running distance and made 47 high - intensity sprints, both better than Rosenborg's 112.4 kilometers and 39 sprints. I recommend setting up notifications to get accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Viking has shown a more solid performance on the defensive end. They have an average of 8.6 clearances per game, compared to Rosenborg's 6.3. Their tackle statistics are
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    • Iqbal ahmad
      Iqbal ahmad
      Rosenborg shows a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly better than Viking's 12.7%. The xG value of 0.92 also surpasses Viking's 0.65, indicating a more potent attack. In terms of passing, Rosenborg's key pass success rate is 61.2%, compared to Viking's 48.9%. The value of their forward passes is 12.7, more efficient than Viking's 9.3. Rosenborg dominates in midfield. Their ball - possession rate in the middle of the pitch is 58.4%, and they are quicker in transitions, taking 1.2 seconds per transition compared to Viking's 1.6 seconds. The team's physical performance is also superior. Rosenborg covers 112.3 kilometers in total running and has 43 high - intensity sprints, both figures higher than Viking's 107.8 kilometers and 31 sprints. I have a professional team and conduct in - depth analysis of selected matches every day. Rosenborg holds a comprehensive edge in defensive statistics. They average 15.2 tackles per 90 minutes
      O/U
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    More Recommend
    • Both Orenburg and Lokomotiv Moscow have been struggling with their offensive efficiency, ranking 4th and 5th from the bottom in the Russian Premier League respectively. Their expected goals (xG) conversion rates are both 0.24 lower than the expected values, indicating a lack of finishing ability in front of the goal. In terms of key passes, Orenburg averages only 7.3 key passes per game with a success rate of 58%, while Lokomotiv Moscow has 8.1 key passes with a 61% success rate. The passing value coefficients in the attacking third are 0.32 and 0.37 respectively, suggesting that both teams have room for improvement in offensive organization. Both teams have a midfield control rate of around 50%, but their transition speed between defense and attack is slow. The combined number of high - speed attacks per game is less than 15. According to the running distance data, both teams average less than 110 kilometers of total running per game, and the combined number of high - intensity sprint
      O/U
      RUS PR Gazovik Orenburg - Lokomotiv Moscow
    • VPS Vaasa is in good form this season, showing significant advantages in various aspects compared to TPS Turku. In attack, VPS Vaasa has an average offensive conversion rate of 18.3% this season, higher than TPS Turku's 15.7%. Moreover, its xG efficiency value of 1.82 clearly outperforms TPS Turku's 1.45. In terms of key passing success rate, VPS Vaasa's 82% accuracy suppresses TPS Turku's 74%. The value of forward passes, 0.43 for VPS Vaasa and 0.31 for TPS Turku, reflects VPS Vaasa's stronger offensive organization ability. During matches, VPS Vaasa controls the midfield for 58% of the time, and its average number of transition attacks reaches 11.2 times per game, 3.4 more high - speed counter - attack opportunities than TPS Turku. In terms of players' running distance, the total running distance of VPS Vaasa's team is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 214 times, both higher than TPS Turku's 106 km and 183 times. I believe that by making careful and well - thought
      O/U
      FIN D1 Vaasa VPS - TPS Turku
    • Both teams are struggling with low offensive efficiency. Warentari's average offensive conversion rate stands at just 9.8%, well below the league - average of 12.3%. Petrolul's expected goals (xG) value of 0.98 is also significantly lower than the 1.35 threshold of the top - five teams in the Romanian league. The passing statistics show a slow - paced game. Warentari's key pass success rate is 72%, and Petrolul's offensive passing value is a meager 0.43 passes per minute. These poor passing performances result in a lack of effective offensive plays. In the midfield battle, Petrolul has an edge in regaining possession, with an average of 13.2 ball recoveries per game, 2.7 more than Warentari. However, their counter - attack threat is weakened by a low counter - attack conversion rate of only 41%. I believe that careful analysis and sincere recommendations are the keys to long - term success. The defensive data sets the tone for this match. FCSB Warența averages 11.3 interceptions per g
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Voluntari - Petrolul Ploiesti
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.