Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Termez Surkhon VS Sogdiana Jizak

    Uzbek League
    Analysis More Tips
    Termez Surkhon
    Termez Surkhon
    Sogdiana Jizak
    Sogdiana Jizak
    Further Reading
    • Imad masi
      Imad masi
      In the Uzbekistan Super League, a focus on the offensive and defensive data comparison between Termez and Sogdiana Jizzakh reveals much about their capabilities. Termez has had a challenging season. With a 40% win rate, 10% draw rate, and 50% loss rate, their performance leaves room for improvement. They average 1.3 goals per game and 1.5 goals conceded. In total, they've scored 13 goals and conceded 15, resulting in a negative goal difference of -2. Their average of 3.2 corner - kicks and 1.7 yellow cards per game indicates a lack of offensive firepower and defensive instability. On the other hand, Sogdiana Jizzakh has shown a more balanced competitiveness. They boast a high win rate of 70%. They average 2.4 goals per game, a significant 0.9 goals more than Termez. Their defensive record is also better, conceding only 1.7 goals per game and a total of 17 goals. With a positive goal difference of +7, they clearly have an edge in both attack and defense compared to Termez. Overall, base
      O/U
      UZB D1 Termez Surkhon - Sogdiana Jizak
    • Hismercy01
      Hismercy01
      In the historical encounters of the Uzbekistan Super League, Termez has shown remarkable strength at home against Sogdiana Jizzakh. In the past six home games against Sogdiana Jizzakh, Termez has achieved an outstanding record of five wins and one loss. Among these victories, four were narrow wins with scores of 1 - 0 or 2 - 1. The sole defeat came in a 0 - 1 loss. Looking at the specific score data: Termez won 2 - 1 with a corner kick count of 5 - 8; another 1 - 0 win had a 6 - 6 corner kick record; a 2 - 0 victory came with 9 - 2 corner kicks; and two more 1 - 0 wins had corner kick counts of 3 - 2 and 6 - 2 respectively. Based on this historical performance, Termez's home - field advantage is quite obvious when facing Sogdiana Jizzakh, and this could play a significant role in future matches. Termez has shown a solid defensive performance at home, conceding only 0.33 goals per game. They also have an edge in corner - kick control, with a historical average corner - kick ratio of 5.6
      O/U
      UZB D1 Termez Surkhon - Sogdiana Jizak
    • 343
      343
      Termez has struggled at home this season. In 8 home games, they've only managed 2 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, a mere 25.0% win - rate. They've scored 7 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of -3 and 8 points, placing them 13th in the league. Their overall offensive efficiency is low, having scored just 15 goals this season, and defensively, they've conceded 23 goals, with 10 of those coming at home, highlighting defensive weaknesses. On the other hand, Sogdiana Jizzakh's away - game performance is also limited. In 8 away games, they have 2 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, also a 25.0% win - rate. They've scored 12 goals and conceded 16, with a goal difference of -4 and 8 points, ranking 11th in the league. However, Sogdiana Jizzakh has shown a significant improvement in recent form. In the last 6 rounds, they've achieved 3 wins and 3 losses (with no draws), a win - rate of 50.0%. They've scored 9 goals and conceded 11. These offensive and defensive statistics are better than Term
      O/U
      UZB D1 Termez Surkhon - Sogdiana Jizak
    More Recommend
    • Cluj-Napoca University has shown greater efficiency in attack. Their conversion rate of offensive finishes is 18.3%, better than KuPS's 12.7%. The xG value stands at 0.78 compared to 0.52 of KuPS. The value of forward passes is 14.2 points, leading KuPS's 11.6 points. The success rate of key passes is 61%, significantly higher than KuPS's 48%. In midfield control, Cluj-Napoca University averages 12.4 interceptions per game, and the conversion speed is 1.8 seconds per time, better than KuPS's 2.3 seconds per time. The total running distance of the whole team is 112.3 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 47, both higher than KuPS's 108.1 km and 39 times. In defense, Cluj-Napoca University has 15.6 tackles per game and 9.2 clearances per game, both superior to KuPS's 12.3 and 7.1 respectively. In terms of offensive efficiency, the scoring - chance conversion rate of Cluj-Napoca University is 24.1%, higher than KuPS's 16.4%. I have a professional team and can provide in - dept
      O/U
      UEFA EL CS Universitatea Craiova - KuPs
    • Zabrze Miners have a more threatening offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate is 22%, better than Ferencváros's 16%, and the xG efficiency is 0.95 compared to 0.68. In terms of passing, the Miners' key pass success rate is 68%, leading Ferencváros's 55%. The value of their forward passes is 12.3 against 8.7, indicating better ball - control quality. On the defensive side, the Miners are more proactive. They have 14 midfield interceptions compared to 10 of Ferencváros and 8 tackles against 5. Their total running distance is 118 km and they have 42 high - intensity sprints, showing better physical fitness. Ferencváros's xG comparison shows that the quality of their offensive opportunities is lower than that of the Miners. However, they have 9 clearances and 12 interceptions on the defensive end, which restricts the Miners' offensive conversion efficiency. The Miners create more threats with an average of 3.2 key passes per game, while Ferencváros has only 1.8. The difference
      AH
      UEFA EL Gornik Zabrze - Ferencvarosi TC
    • Clarksvik shows better offensive efficiency than Lech Poznan. Its conversion rate of offensive finishes stands at 18%, compared to Lech Poznan's 12%. The xG efficiency is 0.74 for Clarksvik and 0.42 for Lech Poznan. In terms of key passes, Clarksvik has a success rate of 62%, leading Lech Poznan's 48%. The value of its forward passes is 1.32, higher than Lech Poznan's 0.91. When it comes to midfield control, Clarksvik averages 14 tackles per game. Its transition speed is 1.8 seconds, faster than Lech Poznan's 2.3 seconds. The total running distance of the whole team is 112 km, with 46 high - intensity sprints, both better than Lech Poznan's 101.4 km and 32 sprints. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected matches every day. Claksvík has been solid in defense, averaging 18 interceptions and 11 clearances per game. This allows them to control the tempo and suppress the opponent's attacks effectively. On the offensive end, Claksvík has a signi
      O/U
      UEFA EL KI Klaksvik - Lech Poznan
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.