Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 9/9Follow100%Win Rate +80.2%ROI 11Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
AfsiezWon 11/14Follow78.6%Win Rate +44.8%ROI 14Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
AbuleWon 4/5Follow77.8%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 18Tips 1.69Avg Odds -
4
Betfid RacingFollow75%Win Rate +30.5%ROI 12Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
Rolv W ErichsenWon 8/10Follow75%Win Rate +28.1%ROI 12Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeWon 8/9Follow72.7%Win Rate +37.2%ROI 25Tips 1.98Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
WolfRMFCTermez has shown significant weaknesses in the Uzbekistan Super League. Their win - rate stands at only 40%, with a 10% draw rate and a 50% loss rate. They've scored 13 goals in total and conceded 15, resulting in a goal difference of -2. With an average of 1.3 goals per game, their offensive efficiency is among the lowest in the league. Defensively, they concede 1.5 goals per game on average, indicating a serious lack of stability, which restricts the team's overall competitiveness. In terms of game details, Termez averages 3.2 corner - kicks per game. They make numerous attempts at wing attacks but have a low conversion rate, failing to effectively boost their scoring ability. The average of 1.7 yellow cards per game shows a lack of discipline under defensive pressure and a relatively high foul rate in physical confrontations. On the other hand, Sogdiana Jizzakh has demonstrated comprehensive advantages. Their win - rate is as high as 70%, with no draws and a 30% loss rate. They've sAH
UZB D1
Termez Surkhon
-
Sogdiana Jizak
-
amvn Won 8/11I've crafted a long - term high - quality product tailored for big players. In terms of offensive conversion, Termez has an edge. Their offensive end conversion rate is 12% higher than that of Sogdiana Jizzakh. The xG efficiency of Termez stands at 0.78, better than Sogdiana Jizzakh's 0.62. When it comes to passing, Termez also leads. The key passing success rate of Termez is 61%. They achieve 14.3 valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Termez shows its strength. They regain possession of the ball 18 times per game on average, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds per time, which is faster than the 1.4 seconds of their opponents. In addition, in terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Termez is 112 km, and they have 43 high - intensity sprints. These figures are 12% and 24% higher than those of Sogdiana Jizzakh respectively. All in all, Termez seems to be in a more favorable position in multiple aspects.AHUZB D1
Termez Surkhon
-
Sogdiana Jizak
48 -
MR SUPERPIDGEIn the historical encounters of the Uzbekistan Super League, Termez and Sogdiana Jizzakh have shown significant differences in home - and - away performances. Sogdiana Jizzakh has a remarkable home - field advantage against Termez. They've won their last two home games against Termez. In one match, they thrashed Termez 5 - 2, with both teams showing active attacks as the corner - kick count was 6 - 6. In another, Sogdiana Jizzakh won 2 - 1 at home. Although Termez had more corner kicks (4 - 9), they couldn't change the result. Historical data shows that Sogdiana Jizzakh's home - win rate against Termez is 100%, winning all their recent home encounters, which strongly highlights their dominance at home. On the other hand, Termez has a relatively stable performance at home against Sogdiana Jizzakh. They won 2 - 1 at home in one game, with a corner - kick count of 5 - 8. They also triumphed 1 - 0 on a neutral ground. Looking at the historical encounters between Termez and Sogdiana JizzakhAHUZB D1
Termez Surkhon
-
Sogdiana Jizak
UZB D1
More Recommend
-
Cluj's recent home performances have shown a significant disparity between attack and defense. In a Romanian League match, Cluj thrashed Voluntari 5-0 at home. They led 3-0 in the first half and dominated with a 10-0 corner kick count, demonstrating high offensive efficiency. However, on the road, they faced setbacks. They lost 1-3 to Rapid București. Despite leading 3-0 at halftime, they couldn't hold the lead. The corner kick count was 10-8, highlighting defensive issues. Even worse, in a UEFA Europa Conference League game, they suffered a 0-5 drubbing against Tromsø, trailing 0-3 at halftime with a 4-0 corner kick deficit, clearly showing defensive flaws. Looking at their past three home games, Cluj averaged 4.33 goals per game but conceded 2.33 on average, indicating an imbalance between attack and defense. In a friendly, they lost 0-2 to Gloria, with a 0-0 corner kick record, suggesting a poor warm - up form. Cluj has an obvious home - field advantage, but they urgently need toO/U
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post