Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Logan Winchester
1.3K
Articles
1
Like
14
Follower
34%
Win Rate
-37.4%
ROI
55
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Rolv W ErichsenFollow81.8%Win Rate +39.7%ROI 11Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
2
YomiAICryptoFollow81.3%Win Rate +41.8%ROI 17Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
AfsiezWon 15/19Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.8%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
b3ndarWon 6/7Follow76.9%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 10/12Follow76.2%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 21Tips 2.21Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeFollow73.7%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 22Tips 1.97Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
DeGreat EagleArsenal has been in excellent form recently, and this was clearly evident in their friendly match against Como. The Gunners demonstrated significant superiority in offensive efficiency and game control. In terms of finishing conversion rate, Arsenal's 24% (xG efficiency of 1.8) outshone Como's 15% (xG efficiency of 1.2). The passing accuracy was also a major factor, with Arsenal's 85% successful key - passes compared to Como's 72%. This shows that Arsenal had a better - coordinated passing game. The value of forward passes further highlighted Arsenal's threat. They recorded a value of 0.65, while Como managed only 0.41, indicating that Arsenal was more adept at creating penetrative attacks in dangerous areas. Tactically, Arsenal had a 60% midfield ball - possession rate, which combined well with their 45% rate of initiating attacks within three seconds. This tactical synergy allowed them to maintain a high - tempo game. The difference in physical performance also played a role. ArsenalO/U
INT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
IbroxoniaArsenal has shown significant fluctuations in their recent friendly matches, with two losses and one win in three games, indicating challenges in tactical coordination. In a friendly, they lost 2-3 to Borussia Dortmund. They were trailing 0-2 at halftime and were at a disadvantage in corner kicks, with a ratio of 8-3. Against Real Betis, the score was 1-3, and they were already 1-3 down at the break. However, they managed a 4-1 comeback against Girona after being 0-2 down at halftime. Statistics suggest that Arsenal has some offensive firepower. Yet, their defensive stability is lacking, especially in corner - kick defense. The lopsided 10-0 corner - kick score in the Champions League match against Paris Saint - Germain highlighted this weakness. Towards the end of the Premier League season, the team showed resilience in crucial games. For example, they won 1-0 against Burnley and adjusted well after a 0-1 loss to West Ham United. However, the high - intensity nature of friendly matcheO/UINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
BigMoh jrArsenal has recently demonstrated a stable offensive - defensive balance in various competitions. Their 60% win - rate is well - matched with an offensive efficiency of 1.7 goals per game. On the defensive end, they've conceded only 10 goals, and a goal difference of 7 reflects their overall competitiveness. On the other hand, Como is known for its more efficient offensive rhythm. An average of 1.9 goals per game and a 60% win - rate create a positive cycle. With 19 goals scored and 10 conceded, a goal difference of 9 highlights their control in matches. Notably, Como shows greater stability with a 30% draw rate, while Arsenal's 20% loss rate implies a slightly higher volatility in their games. Both teams maintain a low number of goals conceded on the defensive side, but Como holds a differential advantage with its better offensive efficiency and goal difference.O/UINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
INT CF
More Recommend
-
Cluj has shown a solid performance at home in this season's Romanian League. Their home record stands at 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, boasting a 50% win - rate. They average 1.66 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per home game. The goal ratio is 10:8, with a goal difference of +2, which highlights a balanced home - field offense and defense. Specific data reveals that Cluj has netted 10 goals at home while conceding only 8. Their average number of corners per home game is 5.5, and they receive 1.2 yellow cards per game, indicating good offensive efficiency and discipline. On the other hand, Universitatea Cluj has a dismal away - game record. They have 0 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses on the road, resulting in a 0% win - rate. They average just 0.5 goals scored and 2.5 goals conceded per away game. The goal ratio is 2:5, with a goal difference of - 3. A comparison shows that Universitatea Cluj's away - game goals (2) are only one - fifth of Cluj's home - game goals, while their away -AH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post