Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Koke Resurrección
478
Articles
0
Like
3
Follower
37.7%
Win Rate
-34.6%
ROI
58
Tips
1.88
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Rolv W ErichsenFollow81.8%Win Rate +39.7%ROI 11Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
2
YomiAICryptoFollow81.3%Win Rate +41.8%ROI 17Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
AfsiezWon 15/19Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.8%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
b3ndarWon 6/7Follow76.9%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 10/12Follow76.2%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 21Tips 2.21Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeFollow73.7%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 22Tips 1.97Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
BigMoh jrArsenal has recently demonstrated a stable offensive - defensive balance in various competitions. Their 60% win - rate is well - matched with an offensive efficiency of 1.7 goals per game. On the defensive end, they've conceded only 10 goals, and a goal difference of 7 reflects their overall competitiveness. On the other hand, Como is known for its more efficient offensive rhythm. An average of 1.9 goals per game and a 60% win - rate create a positive cycle. With 19 goals scored and 10 conceded, a goal difference of 9 highlights their control in matches. Notably, Como shows greater stability with a 30% draw rate, while Arsenal's 20% loss rate implies a slightly higher volatility in their games. Both teams maintain a low number of goals conceded on the defensive side, but Como holds a differential advantage with its better offensive efficiency and goal difference.O/U
INT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
Afc Xylo MarqArsenal has been in excellent form recently, and this was clearly demonstrated in their friendly match against Como. In this game, Arsenal showed obvious advantages in offensive efficiency and game - control ability. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Arsenal's 24% (with an xG efficiency of 1.8) was significantly higher than Como's 15% (xG efficiency of 1.2). This indicates that Arsenal was more effective in turning their offensive opportunities into goals. The passing accuracy also played a crucial role. The success rate of key passes was 85% for Arsenal, while Como only managed 72%. This difference reflects Arsenal's superiority in the precision of passing and cutting, allowing them to create more effective offensive plays. Moreover, Arsenal was better at making threatening penetrations in the opponent's half. The value of forward passes was 0.65 for Arsenal, compared to Como's 0.41. This shows that Arsenal players were more capable of finding their teammates in dangerous areas,AHINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
Subechi MilanistiArsenal has shown significant fluctuations in their recent friendly matches. In a game against Borussia Dortmund, they suffered a 0 - 2 defeat away. They trailed 0 - 2 at half - time. Despite having 8 - 3 corner kicks, indicating ball - control dominance, they struggled to convert their attacks. Against Real Betis at home, they lost 1 - 3. They led at half - time but were then overturned. The 2 - 2 corner - kick result reflected a decline in offensive efficiency. In the match against Girona away, they were thrashed 1 - 4. They were 0 - 2 down at half - time. Although they won the corner - kick count 5 - 4, their defense had numerous holes. Earlier, Arsenal had some good results. They defeated Burnley 1 - 0 at home and Fulham 3 - 0 at home. However, in recent friendlies, their defensive stability is a major concern, with a notably higher rate of conceding goals in the first half. In the Champions League, they drew 1 - 1 away against Paris Saint - Germain. They were 0 - 1 down at half -O/UINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post