Newcastle United vs Everton Tips and Predictions AH Adin Reports

International Club Friendly

Analysis More Tips

Newcastle United

Everton

Further Reading

DJ MEGATRON

Newcastle United has shown significant fluctuations in their form during recent friendlies. In one home friendly, they thrashed Darlington 3-0, leading 2-0 at half-time and having a 0-0 corner count, which demonstrated their strong control of the game. However, in an away match, they defeated Bristol City 4-1, but the 1-17 corner statistic revealed defensive vulnerabilities. They also lost 1-2 to Valencia after leading 1-0 at half-time, suffering a reversal. During the Premier League season, Newcastle United displayed high - efficiency attacks in wins such as a 3-1 victory over West Ham United and another 3-1 win against Brighton. In the last five friendlies, they averaged 2.4 goals per game, but their defensive record was less impressive, conceding an average of 1.6 goals per game. A 1-1 draw against Gateshead, where they had 0-12 corners, indicated that their defensive line needs to improve its ability to withstand pressure. Everton has also had an up - and - down recent run. In an a

O/U
INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
Tech in Asia

Newcastle United has shown a relatively balanced performance recently. Their win - rate stands at 40% (6 wins, 3 draws, and 6 losses in 15 games). They average 1.5 goals per game, concede 1.4 goals per game, and have a goal difference of +1. In the last 10 matches, Newcastle scored 15 goals and conceded 14. This indicates a good balance between offensive efficiency and defensive control. They also average 5.4 corner kicks and 1.1 yellow cards per game, which reflects the team's discipline and ball - control ability during offensive and defensive transitions. On the other hand, Everton has a lower win - rate of only 20% (2 wins, 4 draws, and 8 losses in 14 games). They average 1.4 goals per game, concede 1.6 goals per game, and have a goal difference of - 2. In the same 10 - game period, Everton scored 14 goals but conceded 16. Their defensive goals - conceded rate is 0.2 higher than Newcastle's. Moreover, they average 1.7 yellow cards per game, suggesting significant discipline issues

O/U
INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
Ðan🦨

Newcastle United has shown a more aggressive approach in recent matches. Their attacking efficiency has been notably higher than Everton's. In the last five games, Newcastle had an offensive conversion rate of 12%, while Everton only managed 9%. Although both teams' actual goals fell short of their expected goals (xG), with Newcastle's xG average at 1.2 and Everton's at 0.9, Newcastle still holds an edge. In terms of passing, Newcastle's key - pass success rate is 78%, better than Everton's 70%. The value of Newcastle's forward passes is 1.4 times per game, outperforming Everton's 1.2 times per game, indicating a stronger offensive organization ability. When it comes to midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% ball - possession rate. They also launch an average of 12 counter - attacks per game, which is more threatening than Everton's 8 counter - attacks per game. In terms of physical fitness, Newcastle's total running distance is 110 kilometers, and they have 150 high - i

O/U
INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton

More Recommend

Los Angeles FC has shown a much stronger form this season. In terms of the offensive conversion rate, Los Angeles FC averages 22% per game, significantly higher than Querétaro's 15%. The xG efficiency value of Los Angeles FC is 1.8, better than Querétaro's 1.2. When it comes to the key pass success rate, the home - team's accuracy is 82%, overpowering the away - team's 67%. The value of forward passes of Los Angeles FC is 0.45, nearly 40% higher than Querétaro's 0.32. In midfield control, Los Angeles FC has an average ball - possession rate of 60% and a fast transition speed, with an average counter - attack time of 5.2 seconds. In contrast, Querétaro has a 48% ball - possession rate and a transition time of 7.1 seconds, making Los Angeles FC more imposing. In terms of physical fitness, Los Angeles FC makes 150 high - intensity sprints per game, 24% more than Querétaro's 120. The running distance of Los Angeles FC is 110 km per game, 8 km more than the opponent. All these data sug

AH
NCAL Cup Los Angeles FC - Queretaro FC
Vancouver Whitecaps have shown better form in their head - to - head encounters with Chicago Fire. In terms of offensive efficiency, Vancouver Whitecaps have a clear edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14%, while Chicago Fire only manages 10%. The xG efficiency also favors Vancouver, with a score of 1.2 compared to Chicago's 0.8. When it comes to passing, Vancouver outperforms Chicago. The success rate of their key passes is 84%, higher than Chicago's 74%. Moreover, the value of their front - court passes, at 0.4, is significantly better. In midfield control, Vancouver has a ball - possession rate of 44%. Their average transition speed is 8 seconds, which is faster than Chicago's 10 seconds. Looking at the running data, Vancouver's total running distance is 110 km, and they have 200 high - intensity sprints. These figures are higher than Chicago's 104 km and 180 sprints, indicating their physical fitness advantage. Overall, based on these data, Vancouver Whitecaps seem to b

AH
MLS Chicago Fire - Vancouver Whitecaps
In the Romanian League encounter between Universitatea Cluj and CFR Cluj, there are distinct differences in the offensive efficiency of the two sides. The home team has a much - better offensive conversion rate, standing at 22% compared to the away team's 15%. This indicates that the home team is more capable of finishing their attacks. The xG (expected goals) comparison of 1.8 to 1.2 further highlights their superiority in front of the goal. In terms of passing statistics, the home team's key passing success rate is 78%, outperforming the away team's 65%. The difference in the value of forward passes, 0.45 to 0.32, shows that the home team has a more efficient offensive organization. The home team also dominates in midfield control. With a 62% possession rate and 15 fast - break attacks, they outnumber the away team's 9 fast - break opportunities. Regarding physical fitness, the home team has 128 high - intensity sprints, far exceeding the away team's 96. The difference in running dis

O/U
ROM D1 CFR Cluj Postp. Universitaea Cluj

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Newcastle United VS Everton