Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> blume>

    Deportivo La Coruna VS Real Madrid

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Deportivo La Coruna
    Deportivo La Coruna
    Real Madrid
    Real Madrid
    Further Reading
    • Max Statman | 𝐽𝑢𝑣𝑒.
      Max Statman | 𝐽𝑢𝑣𝑒.
      The key point of this friendly lies in the stark contrast of the home - and - away records between the two teams. La Coruña has shown a strong performance at home this season. They've achieved 8 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses in their home games, with an impressive win - rate of 66.6%. On average, they score 1.33 goals per game and concede 1.0 goal, indicating a stable offensive and defensive efficiency. In total, they've scored 15 goals and conceded 6 in 12 home games, with a goal difference of +9. The average of 4 goals scored and 3 goals conceded per game also demonstrates their defensive tenacity. As for Real Madrid as the away team, their away - game performance is equally remarkable. In 10 away matches, they've got 6 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, a 60% win - rate. They score 1.2 goals and concede 1.3 goals per game on average. In terms of the away - game statistics, they've scored 6 goals and conceded 4, with a goal difference of +2, which shows their competitiveness on the road. Lo
      AH
      INT CF Deportivo La Coruna - Real Madrid
    • きら🐯⚾️🦁
      きら🐯⚾️🦁
      La Coruña has shown a stable performance this season. With a win rate of 60%, a draw rate of 30%, and only a 10% loss rate, they have scored 15 goals while conceding 6. Their average of 1.5 goals per game and 0.6 goals conceded per game put their offensive and defensive efficiency among the top in the league. When playing at home, La Coruña's advantage is even more prominent. Their home - win rate reaches 66.6%, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per game and conceding only 1 goal per game. Their defensive system is solid and efficient. As the away team, Real Madrid has an overall win rate of 70%, a draw rate of 20%, and a 10% loss rate. They have scored 20 goals and conceded 10, with an average of 2 goals per game, indicating a strong offensive firepower. In terms of away - game records, Real Madrid's win rate is 60%, with an average of 1.2 goals per game. However, they concede 1.33 goals per game on average, showing a lack of stability in defense. La Coruña's defensive efficiency at
      AH
      INT CF Deportivo La Coruna - Real Madrid
    • RmAtrebi
      RmAtrebi
      La Coruña has been in solid form in the Segunda División. With a record of 22 wins, 11 draws, and 9 losses, they sit in second place on the league table, boasting a win - rate of 52.4%. This indicates their strong competitiveness. When playing at home this season, the team achieved 11 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses. Their offensive and defensive statistics are well - balanced. They've amassed 38 points at home, ranking tenth. Away from home, their performance is equally remarkable. In 21 away games, they've got 11 wins, 6 draws, and 4 losses, accumulating 39 points and topping the away - game standings. Recently, La Coruña has been particularly outstanding. In their last six games, they've secured 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, scoring 9 goals and conceding 5, with a goal difference of 4. Their win - rate in these recent games is as high as 66.7%. On the other hand, Real Madrid, a top - tier team in La Liga, has had a dominant season in official competitions. With a record of 27 wins, 5 d
      AH
      INT CF Deportivo La Coruna - Real Madrid
    More Recommend
    • Newcastle United and Everton show a clear disparity in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's conversion rate in the final third in recent matches stands at 12%, higher than Everton's 9%. However, their expected goals (xG) averages are 1.2 and 0.9 respectively, and both teams have failed to meet their expected goal - scoring numbers. In terms of passing data, Newcastle's success rate of key passes is 78%, which is better than Everton's 70%. Newcastle also has an edge in the value of forward - field passes, with 1.4 passes per game compared to Everton's 1.2. This indicates that Newcastle has a stronger offensive organization ability. When it comes to midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% possession rate. Coupled with an average of 12 counter - attacks per game, their offensive threat from counter - attacks is much greater than Everton's, which only manages 8 counter - attacks per game. Newcastle United and Everton show a clear difference in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's o
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United - Everton
    • Manchester United, a traditional powerhouse in English football, has a deep squad and rich game experience. In recent years, the team has placed greater emphasis on the speed of attack - defense transitions. The midfield and front - line players rely on their individual skills and rapid cooperation to create scoring opportunities. During home games, Manchester United typically takes control of the game. They look for offensive spaces through wing - based attacks, midfield organization, and high - pressure tactics in the opponent's half. However, the team's defense sometimes suffers from lapses in concentration. To achieve better results, they need to enhance their consistency throughout the matches. In a friendly match, the offensive efficiency between Manchester United and Leeds United showed a clear disparity. Manchester United led with an offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, compared to Leeds United's 14.1%. Moreover, Manchester United's xG efficiency reached 2.4, while Leeds United'
      AH
      INT CF Manchester United - Leeds United
    • Arsenal has been in excellent form recently, and this was clearly demonstrated in their friendly match against Como. In terms of offensive efficiency and field control, Arsenal held a significant edge. The offensive conversion rate of Arsenal was 24% (xG efficiency of 1.8), much higher than Como's 15% (xG efficiency of 1.2). The key pass success rate also showed Arsenal's superiority, with 85% compared to Como's 72%, indicating a better passing and cutting accuracy. The value of forward passes was another area where Arsenal outperformed. Their 0.65 to Como's 0.41 showed that Arsenal was more adept at creating threatening penetrations in the opponent's area. The midfield possession rate of 60% and the proportion of offensive transitions within 3 seconds at 45% formed a tactical synergy. The difference in running distance and high - intensity sprints between the two teams further confirmed the disparity in their physical distribution strategies. Arsenal covered 110 km while Como ran 102
      AH
      INT CF Arsenal - Como
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.