Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
udadheWon 8/9Follow81%Win Rate +63.8%ROI 21Tips 2.18Avg Odds -
2
BiziWon 4/4Follow80%Win Rate +47.9%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
AfsiezWon 15/18Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.6%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
TopnotchWon 4/4Follow76.2%Win Rate +12.6%ROI 21Tips 1.49Avg Odds -
5
AbuleWon 14/17Follow75%Win Rate +18.8%ROI 24Tips 1.64Avg Odds -
6
VΞLØFollow73.3%Win Rate +26.5%ROI 15Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Derrick OdhiamboLooking back at the historical encounter between the two teams, in their previous clash, Sofia Levski defeated Almaty Kairat 1-0 at home, with a goalless draw in the first half and a corner kick count of 7-1. This data clearly reveals the offensive and defensive situation of the game. Sofia Levski had an overwhelming advantage in ball possession and offensive pressure. The 7-1 gap in corner kicks not only reflects the frequency and activity of their wing attacks but also confirms the team's strong control in the midfield. They effectively pressured the opponent through continuous wing breakthroughs and set-piece tactics. Although Almaty Kairat showed excellent defensive performance and conceded no goals in the first half, the fact that they only had one corner kick exposed their serious lack of offensive efficiency on the road. They struggled to create effective threats under the opponent's high pressure. Now, as Almaty Kairat prepares to face Sofia Levski away from home again, they wiAH
UEFA CL
FC Kairat Almaty
0-1 Levski Sofia
-
Kombo Jnr.The recent head - to - head data between CSKA Sofia and Kairat Almaty in the UEFA Champions League provides crucial references. In a previous encounter, CSKA Sofia won 1 - 0 at home. They were level 0 - 0 at half - time, and the full - time corner kick ratio was 7 - 1. This statistic clearly shows CSKA Sofia's significant edge in ball - possession and offensive efficiency. Seven corner kicks indicate that the team created numerous attacking opportunities through continuous midfield control and flank attacks. In contrast, Kairat Almaty's single corner kick highlights their passive situation on the defensive end while playing away. Analyzing their tactical styles, CSKA Sofia prefers to control the game's tempo through ball - possession. They have strong midfield - organizing abilities, which have been demonstrated in many previous head - to - head matches. This historical performance suggests that CSKA Sofia may maintain their dominant position in future encounters. Almaty Kairat needs tO/UUEFA CL
FC Kairat Almaty
0-1 Levski Sofia
-
Iqbal ahmadAlmaty Kairat shows superiority over Sofia Levski in multiple aspects. In terms of attacking conversion rate, Kairat's rate of 18.3% is better than Levski's 14.1%. Kairat also leads in xG efficiency, achieving 1.24 while Levski manages only 0.79 (1.24 - 0.45). Regarding key passing success rate, Kairat has a 62% success rate compared to Levski's 48%. The value of Kairat's forward passes is 12.7, more efficient than Levski's 9.3. In midfield control, Kairat has an average of 18 successful interceptions per game. Their transition speed of 1.2 times per minute is better than Levski's 0.9 times. In terms of running distance, Kairat covers 112.3 kilometers with 32 high - intensity sprints, both figures higher than Levski's 104.8 kilometers and 24 sprints. On the defensive end, Kairat's statistics are also better. They have 14 tackles, 9 clearances, and 19 interceptions, while Levski has 10, 6, and 12 respectively. In attacking efficiency, Kairat's shot - on - target rate is 31%, higher thanO/UUEFA CL
FC Kairat Almaty
0-1 Levski Sofia
UEFA CL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post