Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
TopnotchFollow85.7%Win Rate +28.2%ROI 14Tips 1.50Avg Odds -
2
Kon kha laFollow81.8%Win Rate +60.3%ROI 11Tips 1.98Avg Odds -
3
AfsiezFollow81.3%Win Rate +50.8%ROI 19Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
Hong Duc 🔶 BNBFollow76.5%Win Rate +25.4%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
5
AbuleWon 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +13.7%ROI 24Tips 1.58Avg Odds -
6
ConstanceWon 6/6Follow75%Win Rate +8.7%ROI 12Tips 1.56Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
CouprieJRWolverhampton Wanderers have been in fine form lately, showing clear superiority over Port Vale in multiple key aspects of the game. In terms of attack, Wolverhampton's average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly higher than Port Vale's 12.7%. Their xG efficiency is also more impressive, with a value of 2.1 compared to Port Vale's 1.3. The value of forward passes for Wolverhampton reaches 62.4, while Port Vale only manages 49.1. Moreover, Wolverhampton's key - pass success rate is 61%, much better than Port Vale's 48%. In midfield control, Wolverhampton is equally dominant. They average 14.2 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game, and have improved their transition speed by 2.3 seconds. The whole team runs an average of 112.6 kilometers per game and makes 28.4 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Port Vale's 108.3 kilometers and 21.7 sprints. On the defensive end, Wolverhampton's numbers are also far superior. They make 21.4 clearances, 16.1 interceptiO/U
ENG LC
Wolves
3-0 Port Vale
-
Iqbal ahmadWolves' recent offensive performance has been outstanding. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly higher than Port Vale's 12.7%. In terms of xG efficiency value, Wolves have a clear edge with 2.1 compared to Port Vale's 1.3. The value of Wolves' forward passes reaches 62.4, while Port Vale only manages 49.1. The success rate of Wolves' key passes is 61%, better than Port Vale's 48%. In midfield control, Wolves average 14.2 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game, and their transition speed has improved by 2.3 seconds. The whole team runs an average of 112.6 kilometers and has 28.4 high - intensity sprints, both superior to Port Vale's 108.3 kilometers and 21.7 times. On the defensive end, Wolves' clearances, interceptions, and tackles are 21.4, 16.1, and 18.9 times respectively, notably higher than Port Vale's 15.2, 11.6, and 12.3 times. In attack, Wolves are better at seizing opportunities. Their average shot - on - target rate is 62.1% compared to PortO/UENG LC
Wolves
3-0 Port Vale
-
Kombo Jnr.Wolves have shown a balanced offense - defense situation during the Premier League season. In a draw against Burnley, the team ended 1 - 1, with 7 corner kicks each. This highlights their ability to set up a dense defense. When they hosted Fulham, the game ended 1 - 1. Although they didn't win, the offensive and defensive data was stable, despite having only 3 corner kicks compared to Fulham's 6. In a recent friendly, Wolves thrashed SD Santander 3 - 0, leading 1 - 0 at halftime. Even though they had only 2 corner kicks against 6 of their opponents, the offensive efficiency was significantly improved. However, in a 0 - 3 loss to Brighton away, with 7 - 1 corner kicks in favor of Wolves, it exposed their vulnerability in away - game defense. With an average of 1.2 goals conceded per away game in the Premier League and a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in the last 5 friendlies, it indicates that Wolves have both home - field advantages and away - game risks. As for Port Vale, in theAHENG LC
Wolves
3-0 Port Vale
ENG LC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post