Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Cloudbet>

    Hwaseong FC VS Seoul E-Land FC

    K League 2
    Analysis More Tips
    Hwaseong FC
    Hwaseong FC 0
    0 Seoul E-Land FC
    Seoul E-Land FC
    Further Reading
    • Itz Crossbow
      Itz Crossbow
      In historical encounters between Hwaseong and Seoul E-Land in the K League 2, Seoul E-Land has shown a significant edge in corner kicks during away games against Hwaseong. In three league matches, Seoul E-Land dominated the corner - kick statistics. In one game, though they lost 1 - 2, they had 6 corners while Hwaseong had 2. In another 1 - 1 draw, the corner - kick count was 11 - 2 in favor of Seoul E-Land. And in a 0 - 0 tie, the corner kicks were 8 - 1. On average, Seoul E-Land had 8.3 corner kicks per game, while Hwaseong had only 2.3, with Seoul E-Land accounting for 77.6% of the total corner kicks. This clearly reflects Seoul E-Land's tactical strength in set - piece attacks. However, it's worth noting that in a previous home game, Hwaseong lost 0 - 1 but had 8 corners compared to Seoul E-Land's 5, indicating that Hwaseong's corner - kick tactics can be effective at home. This home - field advantage in corner kicks might play a role in the upcoming match. In past encounters, duri
      AH
      KOR D2 Hwaseong FC 0-0 Seoul E-Land FC
    • Logan Winchester
      Logan Winchester
      In the comparison between Hwaseong FC and Seoul E-Land, Hwaseong FC shows significant advantages in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Hwaseong FC's overall offensive conversion rate is 28%, much better than Seoul E-Land's 19%. The xG value of 1.2 for Hwaseong FC against 0.7 of Seoul E-Land indicates a stronger offensive threat. Regarding passing, Hwaseong FC has a 62% key passing success rate, leading Seoul E-Land's 54%. The value of forward passes reaches 4.8 times per 90 minutes. In the midfield, Hwaseong FC has 18 interceptions, 6 more than Seoul E-Land. This also helps the team increase the speed of counter - attacks by 20%. In terms of physical performance, the average running distance of Hwaseong FC players is 11.3 kilometers, with 23 high - intensity sprints, both higher than Seoul E-Land's 10.6 kilometers and 18 sprints. On the defensive end, Hwaseong FC has 15 tackles, 12 interceptions, and 7 clearances, forming an effective defensive system. In the offensive
      O/U
      KOR D2 Hwaseong FC 0-0 Seoul E-Land FC
    • Warren menier
      Warren menier
      Hwaseong has shown remarkable strength at home in this season's K League 2. In 10 home matches, they've secured 7 wins and 2 losses, boasting a 71.4% win - rate. They average 2.71 goals per game, concede only 1.2 goals, and have a goal difference of 7. The team's offense and defense are both efficient and well - balanced. With an average of 6.2 corner kicks per game, they rank among the top in the league, which highlights their dominance in the flanks' attacks. The average of 2.6 yellow cards per game indicates the intensity of the matches, and it also shows that the home team has a strong ability to control the game on their home ground. On the other hand, Seoul E-Land's performance on the road has been relatively mediocre. In 6 away games, they have 3 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, with a 50% win - rate. They average 1.66 goals per game and concede 1.5 goals, resulting in a goal difference of only 1. With 10 goals scored and 9 conceded in away games, their offensive efficiency is low. Th
      O/U
      KOR D2 Hwaseong FC 0-0 Seoul E-Land FC
    More Recommend
    • In the historical encounters between Haka and JIPPO in the Finnish First Division, Haka has demonstrated a strong dominance at home. Looking back at the recent three home games in the Finnish First Division, Haka has won all the matches against JIPPO. In these three games, Haka scored a total of 9 goals while conceding only 1. This shows that Haka has both high - efficiency offense and a solid defense. Specifically, in one of the matches, Haka staged a 2 - 1 comeback victory at home. They were trailing 0 - 1 at halftime but managed to turn the game around. They also had an edge in corner kicks with a 5 - 2 record. In another game, Haka thrashed JIPPO with a huge 5 - 0 score. They led 4 - 0 at halftime. Although they had fewer corner kicks (2 - 5), they completely outplayed JIPPO in the attacking end. Based on these historical performances, Haka's home - field advantage against JIPPO is quite obvious. Jypypelit has faced challenges in their away encounters against Haka, failing to score
      AH
      FIN D2 FC Haka - JIPPO
    • Fulham has shown a relative balance at both ends of the pitch in recent games. The statistics reveal that the team has a 40% win rate, 30% draw rate, and 30% loss rate. The total goals scored and conceded are both 10, with a goal difference of zero and an average of 1.0 goals per game. This indicates a dynamic equilibrium between their offensive efficiency and defensive stability. Notably, Fulham excels in set - piece tactics. They average 5.3 corner kicks per game, far more than their opponents, making it a crucial scoring method. However, the average of 1.2 yellow cards per game reflects a high - intensity defensive strategy, which might increase the risk of conceding goals when facing fast - countering opponents. As the home team, Fulham needs to keep improving their ball - possession rhythm and the conversion efficiency of set - pieces to maintain tactical initiative in the game. On the other hand, Crystal Palace has a more potent attack, averaging 1.4 goals per game and scoring a
      O/U
      INT CF Fulham - Crystal Palace
    • In this Scottish Championship encounter, a comparison of the two teams' statistics highlights their tactical differences. Livingston has had an outstanding season so far, with a 60% win - rate, placing them among the top teams. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is superior to Partick's. They score 2.1 goals per game on average and concede only 0.6 goals per match. In contrast, Partick scores 1.9 goals and concedes 0.8 goals per game. Looking at the goal - scoring data, Livingston has scored 21 goals and conceded just 6, resulting in a goal difference of +15. This shows that they have a more solid defense and a higher offensive conversion rate. Partick, on the other hand, has a 50% draw - rate, which is among the highest in the league. However, their win - rate is only 40%, and they concede more goals on the defensive end. This indicates that the team struggles to seize winning opportunities. Another aspect to note is the corner - kick statistics. Livingston takes 6.4 corners per
      AH
      SCO CH Partick Thistle - Livingston
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.