Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Lord SatoshiWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +50.7%ROI 12Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
Uske7Won 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 10Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
3
The Goal Line GrindFollow76.5%Win Rate +42.4%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
mata jalyWon 9/10Follow76.2%Win Rate +23.5%ROI 21Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
Ben WayWon 9/10Follow76%Win Rate +48.6%ROI 26Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
6
Gem JohnWon 6/7Follow75%Win Rate +33.5%ROI 30Tips 1.85Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
saidramadhanKrasnodar has shown excellent form in the home games of the Russian Cup. Their winning rate stands at 57.1%, with a draw rate of 28.5% and a loss rate of only 14.2%. On the offensive end, they are highly efficient. At home, they average 2.71 goals per game, having scored a total of 19 goals while conceding only 8. The goal difference of 11 indicates their strong performance in both attack and defense. They also rank high in the efficiency of attack - defense transitions. With an average of 3.2 corner kicks per game, their set - piece tactics are actively executed. The average of 1.8 yellow cards per game reflects the high intensity of the matches. However, their solid defense provides a strong guarantee for the team. Notably, the home - goal efficiency (2.71 goals per game) is significantly higher than the team's overall level (2.4 goals per game), highlighting the amplification effect of the home - field advantage. As the away team, Grozny Terek has also performed steadily this seasonO/U
RUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
-
Iqbal ahmadI've analyzed the performance of Krasnodar and Grozny Terek. In terms of offensive conversion, Krasnodar's rate of 18.3% outshines Grozny Terek's 14.1%. The xG efficiency, 0.78 to 0.52, also reflects Krasnodar's offensive superiority. Krasnodar leads in key passing success rate, with 62% compared to Grozny Terek's 49%. The value of their forward passes is higher, 12.4 to 9.7. In the midfield, Krasnodar shows better control. They've made 14 interceptions compared to 9 by Grozny Terek, and 9 tackles against 6. Their ball - possession rate of 58% to 42% is a clear sign of dominance. As for physical performance, the average running distance of Krasnodar players is 11.3 km, and they've made 42 high - intensity sprints, more than the 35 of their opponents. On the defensive end, the statistics are also in Krasnodar's favor. The clearance ratio is 11:7, interceptions are 14:9, and they've blocked 9.4 offensive finishes. In conclusion, Krasnodar has comprehensive advantages in various data aspeO/URUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
-
Alexandre de QuadrosKrasnodar has been in excellent form at home this season. With a win - rate of 57.1% and an impressive average of 2.71 goals per game, their offensive efficiency ranks among the top in the league. In recent home matches, they've scored 19 goals and conceded 8, with a goal difference of 11. This clearly shows their strong home - field dominance. The team's tactics revolve around rapid attacks and wing breakthroughs, averaging 3.2 corner kicks per game. Their efficient offensive transition ability poses a continuous threat to opponents. However, they need to be cautious in defense. An average of 1.8 yellow cards per game indicates a high level of physical confrontation, which might disrupt their tactical execution in crucial moments. On the other hand, FC Grozny have a stable performance away from home. They have a 40% win - rate and a high 60% draw - rate. They've only conceded 3 goals in away games, placing their defensive efficiency in the upper echelon of the league. The away team scAHRUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post