Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Lord SatoshiWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +50.7%ROI 12Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
Uske7Won 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 10Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
3
The Goal Line GrindFollow76.5%Win Rate +42.4%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
mata jalyWon 9/10Follow76.2%Win Rate +23.5%ROI 21Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
Ben WayWon 9/10Follow76%Win Rate +48.6%ROI 26Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
6
Gem JohnWon 6/7Follow75%Win Rate +33.5%ROI 30Tips 1.85Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Soccer SomKrasnodar has shown excellent form in the home games of the Russian Cup. Their winning rate stands at 57.1%, with a 28.5% draw rate and a mere 14.2% loss rate. On the offensive end, they are highly efficient. At home, they average 2.71 goals per game, with a total of 19 goals and only 8 goals conceded, resulting in a net goal of 11. Their offensive - defensive transition efficiency ranks among the top. They average 3.2 corner kicks per game, indicating an active implementation of set - piece tactics. The average of 1.8 yellow cards per game reflects the high intensity of the matches. Their solid defensive system provides a strong guarantee for the team. Notably, the home - goal efficiency (2.71 goals per game) is significantly higher than the team's overall level (2.4 goals per game), highlighting the magnifying effect of the home - field advantage. As the away team, Grozny Terek has also performed steadily this season. Their away - game winning rate is 40%, the draw rate is 60%, and tO/U
RUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
-
Iqbal ahmadI've analyzed the performance of Krasnodar and Grozny Terek. In terms of offensive conversion, Krasnodar's rate of 18.3% outshines Grozny Terek's 14.1%. The xG efficiency, 0.78 to 0.52, also reflects Krasnodar's offensive superiority. Krasnodar leads in key passing success rate, with 62% compared to Grozny Terek's 49%. The value of their forward passes is higher, 12.4 to 9.7. In the midfield, Krasnodar shows better control. They've made 14 interceptions compared to 9 by Grozny Terek, and 9 tackles against 6. Their ball - possession rate of 58% to 42% is a clear sign of dominance. As for physical performance, the average running distance of Krasnodar players is 11.3 km, and they've made 42 high - intensity sprints, more than the 35 of their opponents. On the defensive end, the statistics are also in Krasnodar's favor. The clearance ratio is 11:7, interceptions are 14:9, and they've blocked 9.4 offensive finishes. In conclusion, Krasnodar has comprehensive advantages in various data aspeO/URUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
-
Mr ManuelKrasnodar has shown a good form recently, winning 5, drawing 3, and losing 2 out of their last 10 games. They've been performing quite well in recent matches. On the other hand, Grozny Terek, despite having a record of 5 wins, 4 draws, and 1 loss in their last 10 games, is in a poor state. Their recent performance has been off - key, and they mainly rely on home - games to pick up points. Krasnodar's defense has been a bit disorganized lately, putting them at a disadvantage. However, there's a tendency for Krasnodar's performance metrics to improve. In contrast, Grozny Terek has been mediocre with inconsistent results. Krasnodar is known for its strong combat ability. But in terms of historical head - to - head meetings, Krasnodar has been on the losing side in the last 10 encounters and has endured 4 winless games in a row. So, in this upcoming clash, which team will seize the initiative? Krasnodar has had a poor run, with 5 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses in their last 10 games. This hasAHRUS Cup
FC Krasnodar
1-1 Terek Grozny
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post