Zenit St. Petersburg vs Baltika Kaliningrad Tips and Predictions AH JJ BEDDINGS

Russia Cup

Analysis More Tips

Zenit St. Petersburg

Baltika Kaliningrad

Further Reading

Soccer Som Won 7/10

Looking at the historical head - to - head record between Zenit Saint Petersburg and Baltika, Zenit holds a clear edge. In the last five direct encounters, Zenit boasted an unbeaten record of four wins and one draw. In terms of corner kicks, Zenit dominated. The cumulative corner - kick score in these five matches was 27 - 10 in Zenit's favor. On average, Zenit had 5.4 corner kicks per game, while Baltika managed only 2.0 per game. Offensively, Zenit was also impressive. They scored seven goals in these five meetings and conceded only one, indicating a high - efficiency defensive performance. On the other hand, Baltika's away form has been lackluster. In their last three away games against Zenit, they failed to secure a win, with only one draw to their name. This shows that when facing Zenit on the road, Baltika struggles to find their rhythm and pick up points. Given the historical data, Zenit seems to be in a strong position in this upcoming encounter. The home team, Zenit St. Peters

AH
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - Baltika Kaliningrad
Funny Memes

St. Petersburg Zenit shows better offensive finishing conversion rate at 18.3% compared to Batka's 14.1%. However, both teams have an xG below 0.8, indicating a lack of offensive efficiency. In terms of key passes, Zenit has a success rate of 62%, leading Batka's 54%, and its forward - pass value is 12.7% higher. Regarding midfield control, Zenit averages 11.2 interceptions per game and has an average transition speed of 1.8 seconds, better than Batka's 2.3 seconds. Zenit also outperforms in terms of running distance, reaching 118.3km, and the number of high - intensity sprints, which is 19 times, both higher than Batka's 109.4km and 14 times respectively. On the defensive end, Zenit has 8.7 tackles per game and 5.3 clearances, with an edge in interception statistics as well. In the attacking aspect, Zenit has a slightly higher shot - on - target rate of 22%, but its conversion rate of scoring opportunities is only 11%, lower than Batka's 13%. The home team, Zenit St. Petersburg, is th

AH
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - Baltika Kaliningrad
Cloudbet

St. Petersburg Zenit has been extremely dominant at home this season. Their home win - rate stands at a high 57.1%, with a draw percentage of 42.8%, remaining undefeated on home soil. Statistics show that the team has scored 16 goals and conceded only 5 at home, with a goal difference of 11 and an average of 2.28 goals per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency ranks among the top in the league. In attack, Zenit creates 3.9 corner - kicks per game on average, posing a significant threat from set - pieces. On the defensive side, they receive only 1.3 yellow cards per match on average. Their excellent discipline control effectively reduces the risk of conceding goals due to fouls. Overall, Zenit's home tactical system is well - developed, with smooth offense - defense transitions, which lays a solid foundation for their games. Their overall record is even more impressive, having scored 25 goals and conceded only 5, with a goal difference of 20 and an average of 2.5 goals per game

O/U
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - Baltika Kaliningrad

More Recommend

Moscow Spartak has shown a clear edge in various aspects compared to Orenburg Gazovik. In terms of offensive efficiency, Moscow Spartak's conversion rate of offensive opportunities stands at 18.2%, significantly better than Orenburg Gazovik's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 to 0.45 further demonstrates Moscow Spartak's offensive dominance. The home - team, Moscow Spartak, also leads in passing. The success rate of key passes is 62%, while Orenburg Gazovik only manages 45%. The value of forward passes is 1.32 for Moscow Spartak compared to 0.89 for Orenburg Gazovik, indicating a more threatening attacking approach. In midfield, Moscow Spartak has a 58% ball - possession rate, leaving Orenburg Gazovik with only 42%. The number of fast transitions is 14 for Moscow Spartak and 8 for Orenburg Gazovik, showing an advantage in game rhythm. Regarding physical performance, the total running distance of Moscow Spartak is 112.3 km, higher than Orenburg Gazovik's 98.6 km. The number of high - int

AH
RUS Cup Spartak Moscow - Gazovik Orenburg
Ferencváros shows a significant edge in various aspects of the game. In terms of offensive conversion, their rate is 12% higher than the away team, with an xG value of 1.8, compared to the opponent's 1.2. Their passing in the front - field is also more valuable, leading by 23%. The success rate of key passes stands at 78%, outperforming the opponent's 65%. In the midfield, Ferencváros has 5 more interceptions and a 15% faster transition speed. The whole team runs a total distance of 112 km and the frequency of high - intensity sprints is 40% higher. On the defensive end, they make 18 tackles and have a clearance efficiency of 82%, which is much better than the opponent's 70%. In attack, they have a stronger ability to seize opportunities, with a difference of +0.6 between actual goals and xG. Overall, Ferencváros seems to be in a very good position in this game, showing comprehensive superiority over their opponents. Ferenecváros has been in excellent form recently, showing high ef

AH
UEFA EL Ferencvarosi TC - Gornik Zabrze
Shaping the outcome of the game, several key statistics highlight the differences between Cruzeiro and Chapecoense. In terms of offensive efficiency, Chapecoense holds an edge. Their conversion rate of offensive opportunities stands at 22.1%, surpassing Cruzeiro's 18.3%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency also favors Chapecoense, with 1.28 compared to Cruzeiro's 0.92. When it comes to passing, Chapecoense outperforms Cruzeiro. The key - pass success rate of Chapecoense is 67%, while Cruzeiro only manages 54%. The value of forward - field passes is 12.7 for Chapecoense, significantly higher than Cruzeiro's 9.3. In midfield control, Chapecoense dominates. They maintain an average ball - possession rate of 58% and execute 61 interceptions per 90 minutes. Their transition speed of 1.8 seconds per play is quicker than Cruzeiro's 2.3 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Chapecoense shows greater stamina. The total team running distance of Chapecoense is 112.4 km, compared to Cruzeiro's

AH
Copa do Brasil Cruzeiro - Chapecoense SC

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Zenit St. Petersburg VS Baltika Kaliningrad