Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Angela Murphy>

    Chelsea VS Juventus

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Chelsea
    Chelsea 0
    1 Juventus
    Juventus
    Further Reading
    • u cant ans
      u cant ans
      I've conducted in - depth research on this game and here's my analysis. Chelsea has been in great form in recent friendlies. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Chelsea's rate stands at 18.7%, outperforming Juventus' 12.3%. The key - pass success rate is also in Chelsea's favor, with 76% compared to Juventus' 68%. The front - field passing value index shows that Chelsea creates an average of 1.9 high - threat opportunities per game, while Juventus only manages 1.4. When it comes to midfield control, Chelsea has an average ball - possession rate of 61%, and their fast - counterattack speed reaches 28.4 km/h, significantly higher than Juventus' 23.1 km/h. In terms of running data, Chelsea accumulates 1,240 meters of high - intensity sprints throughout the game, while Juventus only has 980 meters. This indicates that Chelsea has better physical - energy distribution and coverage density. Overall, Chelsea seems to have an edge in multiple aspects in this friendly match. Juventus has a s
      O/U
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    • Okiem Madridisty
      Okiem Madridisty
      In this friendly match between Chelsea and Juventus, both teams showed mediocre offensive efficiency. Chelsea's offensive conversion rate was only 12%, lower than Juventus' 15%. However, Juventus' xG efficiency value of 1.2 was lower than Chelsea's 1.4, indicating a lack of quality in finishing attacks. In terms of key pass success rate, Juventus reached 78%, better than Chelsea's 72%. But the value of their forward passes was only 0.35 times per 90 minutes, reflecting limited ability to create absolute goal - scoring opportunities. Chelsea led with a 58% midfield control rate, yet their transition attack speed was only 4.2 times per game. Juventus built their positional attack through 423 short passes. In terms of physical data, the whole Juventus team ran 112 km and had 189 high - intensity sprints, 7 km more and 23 more sprints than Chelsea. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Juventus has shown a dominant edge in defense. Th
      O/U
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Chelsea has faced challenges in achieving offensive - defensive balance in their recent pre - season warm - up matches. In a recent home friendly, they lost 1 - 2 to Tottenham Hotspur. Although they managed a 1 - 1 tie in the first half, they conceded a goal in the second half with an equal 1 - 1 corner situation. In another away game, Chelsea suffered a 4 - 6 defeat to the Western Sydney Wanderers. The corner kick statistics were 8 - 7 in favor of the home - team Western Sydney, indicating their inefficiency in organizing attacks on the road. Data shows that in their last two friendlies, Chelsea scored 5 goals but conceded 8, with an average of 4 goals conceded per game, highlighting obvious defensive weaknesses. Looking back at the end of the Premier League season, Chelsea had a 2 - 1 home win over Tottenham but a 1 - 3 away loss to Nottingham Forest. The corner kick data in these two matches was 3 - 4 and 10 - 1 respectively, showing a lack of consistent offensive firepower. On the
      AH
      INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
    More Recommend
    • The home team, FC Wroclaw II, plays in an open style. Their defense on the road is not stable. However, the team is in good form, having remained unbeaten in four consecutive games. They've managed to score goals even during consecutive away matches. In their last two games, they drew both, one at home and one away. Looking at their performance in the past ten games, they've only had two wins, five draws, and three losses. This record isn't particularly impressive, indicating there's room for improvement. The home team, FC Wroclaw II, has been in great form recently, maintaining an unbeaten streak in multiple games. Their attacking end has been outstanding, while their defense has also been top - notch. This season, they've performed better at home than away, and a significant portion of their season's points have come from home games. As a result, the data shows a large concession in the home team's favor. On the other hand, the away team, Stawola, has had an average recent performanc
      O/U
      POL Cup Slask Wroclaw II - Stal Stalowa Wola
    • The home team, Universiteti Bukhara, focuses on tactical coordination. Their coach is very responsive in real - time, often making timely substitutions to reverse the unfavorable situation on the field. Playing at home this time, their chances of winning are significantly increased. On the other hand, the away team, Shurtan Guzar, has an edge in terms of star players. In the previous encounter, the home team couldn't contain the star player's performance, and the away team built their tactics around this star, achieving good results. Both teams are not fully confident of victory in this match. It remains to be seen whether the home team can come up with an effective strategy to stop the away team's star - centered tactics this time. Hurtan Guzo's ranking is not too low, but in fact, they've only managed one win in their last five games. On the other hand, the home team, University of Bukhara, has had a dismal start to the new season, losing both of their first two games by a score of 0
      AH
      UZB D1 Buxoro University - Shurtan Guzor
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.