Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Yossi MedinaFollow85.7%Win Rate +42.6%ROI 14Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
ijuyunWon 7/7Follow81.8%Win Rate +57%ROI 13Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
Eng. Ahmad Al-OqaidiWon 12/14Follow81.3%Win Rate +44.8%ROI 17Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
Decs🐐♒Follow77.3%Win Rate +42%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
Uske7Follow76.9%Win Rate +31.4%ROI 13Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
6
amadousyWon 12/16Follow75%Win Rate +31%ROI 35Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
The Chelsea VerdictIn this Romanian League encounter, Cluj University shows a clear edge over Botosani in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Cluj University has been more productive. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14.2%, significantly higher than Botosani's 8.7%. The expected goals per shot (xG per shot) of Cluj University is 0.18, which is also a notable lead. When it comes to passing, Cluj University outperforms Botosani. The success rate of their key passes reaches 76.3%, and the offensive passing value index is 1.92, compared to Botosani's 68.1% and 1.41 respectively. In midfield control, Cluj University is dominant. They have an average ball - possession rate of 58.4%, and the speed of their fast - break transitions is 12.3 seconds, 2.1 seconds faster than Botosani. In terms of running statistics, the whole team of Cluj University runs an average of 118.7 kilometers per game, with 157 high - intensity sprints, 5.2% and 18.3% higher than Botosani respectively. I can providAH
ROM D1
Universitaea Cluj
2-1 FC Botosani
-
Oscar El Monix〽️🐐Cluj-Napoca University has shown some resilience in recent home games. They defeated Farul 2-1, leading 1-0 at halftime and having an advantage in corner kicks with 2-4. In the Europa Conference League, they beat Brann 3-1 away, leading 2-1 at halftime and with 6-3 corner kicks, highlighting their ball - control ability. However, the team suffered two consecutive losses in friendly matches. They lost 0-3 to both Nyrgyhaza and Vojvodina. In both defeats, they trailed 0-1 at halftime, indicating obvious defensive flaws. In the Europa League, they drew 0-0 with Dynamo Kyiv at home, controlling the game with 5-2 corner kicks. Away from home, they also drew 0-0 with Dynamo Kyiv, with 10-4 corner kicks showing their resilience on the road. Overall, in the last five official matches, they have 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. But the inconsistent form in friendly matches has affected their overall stability. Botoșani has maintained a relatively balanced performance in recent matches. They drew 1-AHROM D1
Universitaea Cluj
2-1 FC Botosani
-
Elvis Coleman 🙂↔️The home - ground pitch of the home team is more conducive to the performance of technical players. The players of the home team have 12 more minutes of ball - possession time at home than away. They are better at organizing attacks through short - passing combinations. The wingers on the home team are of high quality when crossing after breaking through. Their crossing success rate reaches 38%, which can create shooting opportunities for the players making a run into the middle. However, there is a shortcoming in the home team's defense. The midfield players don't cover enough area during defense. As a result, the opponents can easily break through the defense with through - balls in the middle. In the last three games, the home team conceded chances created by the opponents' through - balls in the middle in two of them. The visiting team's midfielders have outstanding organizational skills. The core midfielder averages 65 passes per game, effectively controlling the game's rhythm. MoO/UROM D1
Universitaea Cluj
2-1 FC Botosani
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post