Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Ulsan HD FC VS FC Anyang

    K League 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Ulsan HD FC
    Ulsan HD FC 3
    1 FC Anyang
    FC Anyang
    Further Reading
    • Messi Stan extraaa
      Messi Stan extraaa
      Recently, Ulsan Hyundai has been struggling in their home games. In their previous home matches, they suffered a 1-2 loss to Incheon United. They were leading 1-0 at half - time but then got reversed, and only managed to get 2 corner kicks. Another home defeat was a 1-3 loss to Jeonbuk Hyundai. They were trailing 0-1 at half - time and were at a disadvantage in terms of corner kicks with a 2-5 record. Looking back at their last five games (including those in the Korean Cup), the team has only achieved 1 win, 1 draw, and 3 losses. They have conceded a total of 9 goals, averaging 1.8 goals per game, which clearly shows significant defensive flaws. The corner - kick statistics further confirm their weak control at home. In the 2-2 draw against Incheon United, they were behind in corner kicks, and when they lost 2-5 to Jeonbuk Hyundai, they also didn't have an advantage in this aspect. All in all, Ulsan Hyundai needs to improve their home - game performance urgently. One team has shown off
      AH
      KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang
    • Orlando Rodas Díaz
      Orlando Rodas Díaz
      Ulsan Hyundai Deaf (Ulsan HD) has shown an impressive form lately, winning 4, drawing 2, and losing 4 in their last 10 matches. Their outstanding performance can be attributed to the improvements in both offense and defense, making them a formidable force on the pitch. On the other hand, FC Anyang has also been in good shape, with 5 wins, 4 draws, and 1 loss in their last 10 games. In terms of strength, the two teams are quite evenly - matched. However, looking at the win - loss record, FC Anyang is slightly inferior to Ulsan HD. FC Anyang also has a solid defense. In their past 10 head - to - head encounters, Ulsan HD has been at a disadvantage. But considering their current form, Ulsan HD has a good chance of winning this game. In their last match, they showed great tenacity and demonstrated their strength in a tough battle. Ulsan HD has been performing well in recent games and doesn't want to face defeat. They are highly motivated for this match. With all the positive factors in the
      AH
      KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang
    • Le Quotidien SN
      Le Quotidien SN
      Ulsan HD has recently shown significant fluctuations in their home - field performance. In a home game, they lost 1 - 2 to Incheon United. The game was tied 1 - 1 at halftime, and the corner - kick count was 2 - 2, indicating a continuous lack of offensive efficiency. In another home match, they were defeated 1 - 3 by Cheonan City. They were trailing 0 - 1 at halftime, and the corner - kick ratio was 2 - 5, showing weakness in the offensive end. Looking back at their last five league games, Ulsan HD had a record of 1 win, 1 draw, and 3 losses. They won 2 - 1 against Jeju United at home and drew 2 - 2 away to Daejeon Citizen. However, they lost 1 - 3 away to FC Seoul, 1 - 2 at home to Incheon United, and 1 - 3 at home to Cheonan City. On average, they scored only 1.0 goal per game and conceded 2.5 goals, highlighting prominent problems in both attack and defense. Regarding corner - kick statistics, they averaged 4.0 at home, but their away performance was poor. For example, in the away
      AH
      KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang
    More Recommend
    • In comparing the offensive efficiencies of Brann and Rosenborg, Rosenborg has an edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.3%, better than Brann's 9.8%. Although both teams have relatively low xG efficiencies, Rosenborg's 0.78 xG per game gives them a slight lead. Looking at the passing statistics, Rosenborg's key - pass success rate of 41% outperforms Brann's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.23 compared to Brann's 0.91, indicating a more threatening attack. When it comes to midfield control, Rosenborg holds the upper hand with an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a transition speed of 1.8 times per minute. In terms of physical exertion, Brann runs more, with a total distance of 112 km and 52 high - intensity sprints, compared to Rosenborg's 108 km and 45 sprints. On the defensive end, Brann is also more active, recording 14 tackles and 21 interceptions. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of selected matches every day. Ros
      O/U
      NOR D1 Brann - Rosenborg BK
    • Mexico's Club América shows a better offensive performance compared to Santos Laguna. América's offensive conversion rate is 18.2%, higher than Santos Laguna's 14.4%, and its xG efficiency stands at 0.78 against 0.59. In terms of key passes, América has a success rate of 62%, leading Santos Laguna's 55%. The value of its forward passes is 12.3, more efficient than 9.8. In midfield control, América holds a 58% possession rate and a transition speed of 6.2 times per 90 minutes. The whole team's average running distance is 11.3 km, with 42 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing the opponent. On the defensive end, América has 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, comprehensively outperforming Santos Laguna. In the offensive end, América is more capable of seizing opportunities. Its shooting accuracy is 28% compared to 19% of Santos Laguna, and the corner - kick conversion rate is 12%, double that of 6% of the opponent. The cumulative xG is 1.35 for América and 0.
      O/U
      MEX D1 Club America - Santos Laguna
    • Toluca shows clear superiority over Necaxa in several key offensive metrics. Their attacking conversion rate stands at 18.3%, compared to Necaxa's 12.7%. Toluca's xG efficiency is 1.24, while Necaxa's is only 0.98. In terms of forward passing, Toluca has a 12.4% higher passing value in the attacking third, and their key passing success rate remains at 68%. In midfield control, Toluca is equally dominant. They average 14.2 interceptions per game, with a transition speed 0.8 seconds faster than Necaxa. Toluca also has 27 more high - intensity sprints and runs 1.2 kilometers more in total per game. On the defensive side, Necaxa is struggling. They only manage 9.1 tackles per game, and their clearance count is 35% lower than Toluca's. In the attacking third, Toluca creates 6.8 scoring opportunities per game, with a conversion rate of 19.6%, significantly higher than Necaxa's 14.3%. The xG comparison shows that Toluca's expected goals are 1.42, while Necaxa's are only 0.89, indicating a com
      AH
      MEX D1 Toluca - Necaxa
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.