Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
VIAMOND💎Won 6/6Follow88.2%Win Rate +65.2%ROI 18Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
Cooper MwaangaFollow83.3%Win Rate +44.3%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
Boruto Otsutsuki ⭐⭐⭐🏳️🌈Follow81.8%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 11Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
NyraFollow78.9%Win Rate +51.3%ROI 19Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
Freeman55Won 10/12Follow78.6%Win Rate +40.4%ROI 14Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
Crypto BetManFollow75%Win Rate +31.1%ROI 29Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Steven MarleyMaran holds an edge in offensive finishing conversion rate, with 18% compared to their opponent's 12%, and xG efficiency, at 1.3 against 0.8. The key pass success rate, 65% for Maran versus 52% for the other side, showcases Maran's offensive organization ability. The difference in the value of forward passes, 1.2 for Maran and 0.7 for the opponent, indicates a gap in ball - control quality. The number of midfield interceptions, 14 for Maran and 9 for the rival, strengthens Maran's offensive - defensive transitions. The running distance, 118km for Maran and 109km for the other team, along with the number of high - intensity sprints, 82 for Maran and 65 for the opponent, reflects a disparity in physical reserves. On the defensive end, the data of tackles (21 vs 15) and clearances (18 vs 12) highlight the resilience of Maran's defensive line.AH
IDN PC
Arema FC
2-0 DPMM FC
-
JJ BEDDINGSMaran shows clear advantages in several key aspects. In terms of offensive finishing conversion rate, Maran has an 18% rate compared to the opponent's 12%. The xG efficiency also favors Maran, with a 1.3 rating against the opponent's 0.8. The key pass success rate, at 65% for Maran and 52% for the other side, reflects Maran's strong offensive organization ability. The value of forward passes, 1.2 for Maran and 0.7 for the opponent, indicates a significant difference in ball - control quality between the two teams. In the midfield, Maran's higher number of interceptions (14 compared to 9) strengthens their offensive - defensive transition. The running distance and high - intensity sprints also reveal a disparity in physical fitness. Maran has covered 118 km in total running distance, while the opponent has only reached 109 km. The number of high - intensity sprints for Maran is 82, far more than the opponent's 65. On the defensive end, Maran's statistics of tackles (21 vs 15) and clearaAHIDN PC
Arema FC
2-0 DPMM FC
-
Nö Lie Män📵The home team's strong performance at home this season is a key factor in this upcoming encounter. Maran has a remarkable home record this season. In 6 home games, they've secured 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, boasting a high win - rate of 75%. They average 2.0 goals per game and concede 1.4 goals, with a goal difference of +3. This shows that their offensive and defensive efficiency ranks among the top in the league. In terms of specific statistics, Maran averages 5.2 corner kicks and 2.2 yellow cards per home game, indicating a fast - paced and physically intense game style. Their offensive end is productive while the defense remains efficient. On the other hand, Brunei DPMM has been in poor form on the road. In 4 away games, they've only managed 0 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, with a win rate of just 20%. They average 1.4 goals and concede 1.8 goals per away game, resulting in a goal difference of - 4. This reveals obvious defensive flaws and a lack of offensive firepower. ConsideringO/UIDN PC
Arema FC
2-0 DPMM FC
IDN PC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post