Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Side Eye NemoWon 4/4Follow84.6%Win Rate +62.2%ROI 14Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 19Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
Freeman55Won 8/9Follow83.3%Win Rate +45%ROI 12Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Crypto BetManFollow75%Win Rate +30.4%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
VIP100%Follow73.3%Win Rate +29.2%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
Mawen16168Follow72.7%Win Rate +30.9%ROI 12Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Iqbal ahmadThe attacking conversion rate of FK Sūduva is as high as 28%, significantly higher than B68 Toftir's 19%. Its xG efficiency value reaches 1.8, 0.6 higher than the opponent's. In terms of the value of forward passes, the home team completed 32 effective passes with an 81% success rate, better than the away team's 24 passes with a 65% success rate. The midfield control data shows that FK Sūduva has an average of 11 interceptions per game, 3 more than the opponent, and the speed of attack - defense transitions has increased by 15%. The whole team's average running distance reaches 112 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 58, both leading the opponent. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected matches every day. Clarksvik is at a significant disadvantage in defensive statistics. They only manage 7 tackles per game, 4 fewer interceptions than the home team. Their clearance success rate is as low as 62%. In terms of attacAH
UEFA CL
Kauno Zalgiris
1-0 KI Klaksvik
-
Mr WellWhen comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, here is an analysis of the match between FK Sūduva Marijampolė (referred to as Sūduva) and B68 Toftir. Sūduva shows an edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, which is better than B68 Toftir's 12.4%. The xG efficiency, with a figure of 0.78 compared to the opponent's 0.41, further demonstrates their offensive superiority. In terms of passing, Sūduva's key passing success rate is 62%, outperforming the 54% of B68 Toftir. The value of their forward passes is also higher, at 12.3 against 9.6, indicating a more efficient passing game in the attacking third. The midfield control is another area where Sūduva takes the lead. They have a 58% midfield control rate. Their transition speed is also quicker, with an average of 9.2 seconds, while B68 Toftir takes 11.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Sūduva is 112.4 kilometers, more than B68 Toftir's 107.8AHUEFA CL
Kauno Zalgiris
1-0 KI Klaksvik
-
Aykut TırmıkçıKauhno Sakilles adheres to a conservative counter - attacking strategy. Their on - field formation is well - organized, and the players execute the tactics with high stability. They show remarkable resilience under high - intensity pressure. The team has deliberately reduced ineffective ball - control and stalemate situations in the midfield. By doing so, they have successfully improved the speed of their offensive and defensive transitions. On average, they complete 10.6 clearances in the backcourt per game, which indicates that their low - position defense system is solid. They can effectively defuse the opponent's continuous passing and controlling pressure. In the midfield, Kauhno Sakilles focuses on defensive interceptions and disrupting the rhythm of the game, thus effectively limiting the opponent's advancing routes. However, their major shortcoming is the lack of creativity in independent attacks. In a passive situation, the offensive activity in the front - field is relativelyAHUEFA CL
Kauno Zalgiris
1-0 KI Klaksvik
UEFA CL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post