Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Freeman55Won 8/8Follow85.7%Win Rate +50.9%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 19Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
Side Eye NemoWon 6/7Follow83.3%Win Rate +59.8%ROI 13Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
VIP100%Follow75%Win Rate +32.7%ROI 18Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
5
CHRISPUSFollow73.3%Win Rate +36.8%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
6
Simon PhillipsFollow72.7%Win Rate +29.3%ROI 22Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Ben WayIn their previous encounter in a club friendly, Sydney FC suffered a 0 - 1 defeat at home against Tottenham Hotspur. The score remained 0 - 1 at halftime, and the corner kick count was 3 - 6 in favor of Tottenham. This historical data highlights Tottenham's tactical edge in attack - defense transitions. The corner kick statistics show that Tottenham had six corner opportunities while Sydney only had three, indicating Tottenham's efficiency in wing attacks and set - piece executions. Sydney's failure to score at home demonstrated a lackluster performance on the offensive end. The 0 - 1 halftime score suggests that Tottenham successfully controlled Sydney's offensive rhythm from the start of the game. Their defense was solid, conceding only one goal in the match. These figures provide crucial tactical references for the upcoming clash. The efficiency of Tottenham's wing attacks and their ability to execute set - pieces will be the key points to watch.O/U
INT CF
Sydney FC
1-1 Tottenham Hotspur
-
sterling pgupThe historical head-to-head data between Sydney FC and Tottenham Hotspur provides crucial references for their upcoming friendly match. In a previous encounter, Sydney FC lost 0-1 at home to Spurs, trailing 0-1 at halftime. The corner kick count of 3-6 highlighted Spurs' tactical edge in wing attacks. Spurs created numerous threats through wing breakthroughs and crosses. Sydney FC's defense faced pressure when dealing with quick passes and cuts. The difference in corner kicks reflects a clear gap between the two teams in ball - control rhythm and offensive efficiency. Even though friendly matches often involve squad rotations, this data still offers an objective basis for comparing their tactical styles. As a Premier League team, Spurs' high - pressing and wing penetration tactics have shown consistency in past games. The cross - passing cooperation between wingers and midfielders has been a key scoring factor. In recent years, Sydney FC, an A-League club, has made significant effortsO/UINT CF
Sydney FC
1-1 Tottenham Hotspur
-
Tropical IslandThe upcoming friendly match between Sydney FC and Tottenham Hotspur will spotlight the difference in home - away form. Sydney FC's home record reveals a concerning situation. They have a 0% win rate, a 75% draw rate, and a 25% loss rate. On average, they score 1.0 goal per game and concede 1.25, resulting in a negative goal difference of -1. This indicates that the team struggles to break the deadlock at home, though their defense is relatively solid. Moreover, their average number of corner kicks at home is 4.09, significantly lower than Tottenham's 7.6 on the road, showing a lack of efficiency in the attacking end. In contrast, Tottenham Hotspur boasts a 60% win rate and 0% draw rate on the road, with a 40% loss rate. Their average of 1.2 goals per game away from home is higher than Sydney's 1.0 at home. They have scored 6 goals and conceded 4 on the road, leading to a positive goal difference of +2, highlighting their outstanding offensive efficiency. Additionally, Tottenham averageAHINT CF
Sydney FC
1-1 Tottenham Hotspur
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post