Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Freeman55Won 8/8Follow85.7%Win Rate +50.9%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 19Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
VIP100%Follow81.3%Win Rate +44.6%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
Side Eye NemoFollow80%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 11Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
CHRISPUSFollow73.3%Win Rate +36.8%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
5
★BANK★Won 7/8Follow73.3%Win Rate +19.3%ROI 15Tips 1.81Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Alex RussellZagreb Dinamo has shown significant home - field advantage in Champions League home games. This season, they've had an unbeaten record in 7 home games, with 5 wins and 2 draws, achieving a remarkable 70% win rate. The team leads comprehensively in offensive and defensive statistics. They've scored 27 goals while conceding only 5, with a staggering goal difference of 22. Their average goal per game stands at 2.7, with 4.3 corner kicks and 0.9 yellow cards per game. This reflects their efficient offensive system and solid defensive capabilities. When playing at home, their win - rate is 50% and the draw rate is 50%, remaining undefeated. This is mainly due to their effective fast - counterattack tactics and well - organized defense line. In contrast, Thun has been extremely lackluster on the road. In 4 away games, they've only managed 1 win, 1 draw, and 2 losses, resulting in a mere 25% win rate. Their offensive efficiency is low, with an average of 1.25 goals per game. Defensively, theyO/U
UEFA CL
Dinamo Zagreb
2-2 Thun
-
Iqbal ahmadI'm a professional analyst with a team, dedicated to providing in - depth analysis of selected football matches. Zagreb Dinamo shows clear offensive superiority over Thun. In terms of the full - field offensive finishing conversion rate, Zagreb Dinamo's 28% is better than Thun's 19%. The xG efficiency ratio of 1.8:1.2 further highlights their offensive edge. When it comes to passing, Zagreb Dinamo has a key passing success rate of 62%, while Thun only manages 45%. The value of forward passes, at 12.3:8.7, reflects Zagreb Dinamo's better ball - control efficiency. Defensively, Zagreb Dinamo's midfield interception success rate is 48%, much higher than Thun's 35%. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds per play. The total team running distance of 112 km is 6 km more than Thun's, and the high - intensity sprint counts of 23:15 demonstrate their better physical reserves. Zagreb Dinamo also shows more defensive initiative, with 18 tackles compared to Thun's 10, and an 8.4 clearance rAHUEFA CL
Dinamo Zagreb
2-2 Thun
-
Panji SuryonoZagreb Dinamo has developed a refined midfield passing and control system. They rely on frequent short - pass rotations to precisely regulate the game rhythm. By using multi - player coordinated runs without obvious flaws, they pull the gaps in the opponent's defense, gradually advancing to create high - quality offensive opportunities. The team has a well - established tactical system and solid team chemistry. Their performance in the UEFA Champions League qualifiers has been stable. In the last five matches, their passing success rate was 65%, and they averaged 7.1 key passes per game. Their positional attack is well - structured, and the overall error rate is extremely low. However, Zagreb Dinamo has a weakness in adapting to high - intensity close - range confrontation. If the opponent applies continuous close - range pressing, it will disrupt their passing and control rhythm, and the overall coherence of their offense will decline significantly. Thun adheres to a pragmatic conceptAHUEFA CL
Dinamo Zagreb
2-2 Thun
UEFA CL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post