Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍>

    Philippines VS Myanmar

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Philippines
    Philippines 1
    4 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • Dr Champagne
      Dr Champagne
      The Philippine team has been in excellent form at home this season, with a record of 4 wins and 1 draw. They average 2.4 goals scored and 1.0 goal conceded per game, ranking high in both offensive and defensive efficiency. Their 58% possession rate and 45% shot conversion rate are quite remarkable. The high - pressure pressing tactic has effectively increased their attacking threat. The team's star striker has been in red - hot form, contributing 5 goals recently, which provides continuous impetus for the offense. In contrast, Myanmar has struggled on the road. In their 5 away games, they have only managed 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 0.8 goals scored and 1.4 goals conceded per game. There are obvious defensive flaws, with a counter - attack success rate of less than 30% and weak midfield control. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines holds an advantage, having won 3, drawn 1 and lost 1 in the last 5 meetings. This gives them a significant psycho
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • sterling pgup
      sterling pgup
      The Philippines has been in great form at home recently. They showed their dominance in a series of home matches. In an international friendly, they thrashed Myanmar 5 - 1. They led 1 - 0 at halftime and had a 6 - 3 advantage in corner kicks, highlighting their efficient offensive organization and set - piece tactics. Before that, they also defeated Guam 5 - 1 at home. They also won 3 - 1 against East Timor and 4 - 1 against Maldives in previous home games. In the last four home matches, they averaged 3.25 goals per game, and their corner - kick statistics were better than their opponents, indicating excellent home offensive and defensive efficiency. The Philippines averages 4.5 corner kicks per home game. Their set - piece tactics are well - executed, creating numerous scoring opportunities. On the other hand, Myanmar has been struggling on the road. They lost 0 - 4 to Vietnam away from home, with a 7 - 1 corner - kick disadvantage, revealing obvious defensive flaws. Burma has struggl
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • CFCDaily
      CFCDaily
      The Philippines team demonstrates a strong dominance when playing at home. This season, their home - win rate reaches as high as 83.3%. In 10 home games, they scored 21 goals while conceding only 7, with a goal difference of 14. Their average goals per game are 3.5, and their defense is extremely solid. Specific data shows that in home games, the Philippines average 2.9 goals, 2.9 corner - kicks, and 1.7 yellow cards per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency ranks among the top in the league. On the other hand, the Myanmar team faces tough challenges on the road. In 6 away games, they only managed 2 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses, with a win rate of just 33.3%. They average only 1.16 goals per game, concede as many as 17 goals, and have a goal difference of - 10. Their defensive system has obvious loopholes. In away games, Myanmar average 1.5 goals and 2.3 goals conceded per game, and their offensive and defensive efficiency lags far behind. In terms of overall records, the Philipp
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • In the Champions League encounter between Celje and Egnatia, Egnatia has demonstrated greater efficiency in the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, which is higher than Celje's 12.7%. The xG value of 1.8 compared to 1.2 indicates a greater scoring potential for Egnatia. In terms of key passes, Egnatia's success rate is 72%, leading Celje's 64%. The value of their forward passes, 14.2, is also more efficient than Celje's 9.8. When it comes to midfield control, Egnatia has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and 11.3 successful interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than Celje's. Running data shows that Egnatia has 12 more high - intensity sprints, with a total covered distance of 118 km. On the defensive end, Egnatia has 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and a clearance efficiency of 78%, significantly better than Celje's 62%. Overall, Egnatia seems to have an edge in this Champions League clash. Egnatia has established a double
      AH
      UEFA CL NK Publikum Celje - Egnatia
    • Shamrock Rovers has been in good form recently, showing strong competitiveness in both attack and defense. In this game, they have obvious advantages over Alashkert Yerevan. In terms of attack, Shamrock Rovers' offensive conversion rate is 18.3%, which is better than Alashkert Yerevan's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 compared to 0.89 also reflects their superiority in the offensive end. Moreover, Shamrock Rovers' key pass success rate is 62%, leading Alashkert Yerevan's 49%. The value of their front - court passes, 11.2 compared to 7.6, indicates a more threatening attack. In the midfield, the difference in control is evident. Shamrock Rovers' 15 midfield interceptions far exceed Alashkert Yerevan's 9. The running distance of 112 km for Shamrock Rovers against 1.4 km for Alashkert Yerevan also shows a significant gap in physical fitness reserves. On the defensive side, the statistics are also in favor of Shamrock Rovers. They made 12 tackles and 8 clearances, while Alashkert Yerevan
      AH
      UEFA CL Shamrock Rovers - FC Ararat Armenia
    • In this Argentine Primera División encounter, let's take a deep - dive into the analysis of both teams. Looking at the offensive aspects, Banfield has a significant edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, much better than Sarmiento's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 for Banfield compared to 0.79 for Sarmiento clearly showcases their attacking superiority. In terms of passing, Banfield's key pass success rate is 62%, while Sarmiento's is only 49%. This indicates a notable gap in passing quality. The value of forward passes, 15.2 for Banfield against 9.6 for Sarmiento, reflects Banfield's better ball - control ability. When it comes to midfield control, Banfield leads with a 58% control rate. Moreover, their transition speed is 12.4 seconds, faster than Sarmiento's 15.1 seconds. In terms of physicality, Banfield outperforms Sarmiento. The total team running distance of Banfield is 112.3 km, higher than Sarmiento's 107.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for
      AH
      ARG D1 Banfield - Sarmiento Junin
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.