Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Freeman55Won 8/8Follow85.7%Win Rate +50.9%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
VIP100%Follow80%Win Rate +44.5%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow78.9%Win Rate +49.2%ROI 20Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
CHRISPUSFollow73.3%Win Rate +36.8%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
5
amvnFollow72.7%Win Rate +28.4%ROI 24Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
Crypto BetManFollow72.7%Win Rate +26%ROI 24Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Jose CidWest Sydney Wanderers' tactical approach is 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 with a deep defensive counter - attack. Aware of the significant gap in strength, they'll have 5 - 6 players retreat to the penalty area throughout the game. The double defensive midfielders will guard the middle, giving up the ball possession. The expected ball possession rate is within 35%. They'll rely solely on strikers Borrello and Gillon for quick counter - attacks against Chelsea's rotated defense. The advantages of West Sydney Wanderers lie in their familiarity with the home ground. The counter - attacking strikers are fast, and there are also sporadic scoring opportunities from set - pieces. However, they have fatal weaknesses. The midfield has only one passing option, which will lead to a very high passing error rate under Chelsea's high - pressure pressing. The defenders are slow to turn, and they can't limit the runs and breakthroughs of Palmer and Pedro at all. Chelsea's tactical approach is centered around a 3-4-2-AH
INT CF
Western Sydney
4-6 Chelsea
-
MR SUPERPIDGEWest Sydney Wanderers have shown poor form at home this season. They've failed to secure a single victory in all home games, with a win - rate of 0% and a loss - rate of 100%. Statistically, they average just 0.66 goals per home game while conceding a staggering 8 goals. Their goal difference stands at - 6, highlighting a significant imbalance between attack and defense. In terms of other metrics, they average 5 corner kicks per home game and receive 1.7 yellow cards. This indicates low offensive efficiency and numerous defensive flaws, with their goal - conceding rate far exceeding the league average. On the other hand, Chelsea's away record is also far from satisfactory. They have a win - rate of 0%, a draw - rate of 33.3%, and a loss - rate of 66.6%. They average 0.66 goals per away game and concede 6 goals, resulting in a goal difference of - 4. Although they face considerable defensive pressure, their situation is slightly better than West Sydney's. Chelsea average 5.09 corner kicAHINT CF
Western Sydney
4-6 Chelsea
-
ICEKHIDWest Sydney Wanderers have been struggling at home this season. Their home - game record is abysmal, with a 0% win rate, 0% draw rate, and a 100% loss rate. In 10 home matches, they've only managed 2 goals, while conceding 8. The average goals per game are 0.66, and the average goals conceded per game reach 8.0, resulting in a negative goal difference of - 6. On the offensive end, they're highly inefficient. The overall average goals per game are 1.4, far lower than the 2.0 average goals they concede on the defensive end, indicating a serious imbalance between attack and defense. In 10 home matches, they've conceded 20 goals, an average of 2.0 per game, which clearly shows the flaws in their defensive system. On the other hand, Chelsea's away - game performance has been relatively more stable. Their 33.3% draw rate (3 draws) on the road shows their ability to avoid defeat. Even though the loss rate is 66.6%, they've scored 2.0 goals and conceded 6.0 in away games. The average goals perO/UINT CF
Western Sydney
4-6 Chelsea
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post