Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow77.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
SILENCE🌓XS✨Won 4/5Follow76.9%Win Rate +47.7%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
CHRISPUSFollow76.9%Win Rate +44.4%ROI 13Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
4
Freeman55Won 8/8Follow76.5%Win Rate +36%ROI 17Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
VIP100%Follow75%Win Rate +36%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Football XWon 5/6Follow75%Win Rate +23.7%ROI 12Tips 1.96Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Umara QueenRosenborg has shown a relatively stable performance at home in the Norwegian Premier League. This season, their home win rate stands at 42.8%, with an average of 1.71 goals scored and 1.2 goals conceded per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is quite balanced. Specific data reveals that the team has scored 12 goals and conceded 12 goals at home, resulting in a goal difference of 0. This indicates that their defensive ability and offensive firepower are on par, and they have a clear advantage in controlling home - games. The team also has an average of 4 corner kicks per game at home, higher than Fredrikstad's 3.8 corner kicks per game on the road. This highlights the effectiveness of their set - piece tactics. Moreover, Rosenborg receives an average of 1.7 yellow cards per game, less than Fredrikstad's 2.29. This shows that the home team has better discipline and fewer fouls. On the other hand, Fredrikstad is facing a tough challenge on the road. This season, their away winO/U
NOR D1
Rosenborg BK
4-0 Fredrikstad
-
Ingram⚪🔴Frederikstad has been in excellent form in terms of offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate of offensive opportunities stands at 24%, significantly higher than Rosenborg's 15%. The xG efficiency also shows a clear edge, with Frederikstad at 1.8 compared to Rosenborg's 1.2, indicating their high - end finishing ability. In passing analysis, Frederikstad's key pass success rate is 85%, better than Rosenborg's 80%. The value of their forward passes is 0.5, while Rosenborg's is only 0.3, which means Frederikstad can create more substantial threats. When it comes to midfield control, Frederikstad has a 60% ball - possession rate. Their transition speed is 8 seconds, much faster than Rosenborg's 12 seconds, giving them an advantage in quick counter - attacks. In terms of physical data, Frederikstad's total running distance of 110 km and 200 high - intensity sprints throughout the game are both ahead of Rosenborg, which can support them in maintaining a high - intensity game rhythm. OveraAHNOR D1
Rosenborg BK
4-0 Fredrikstad
-
freekbassThe home team has secured most of its points at home this season, with a strong and passionate home - crowd atmosphere. However, there are some concerns. The team's second - top scorer, Islamovic, is out injured, which weakens its offensive rotation. In midfield, when facing high - intensity pressing, passing the ball becomes difficult. After a long period of fruitless attacks, the defense tends to lose concentration. On the other hand, Fredrikstad is in poor form recently. They've suffered two consecutive league losses and failed to score in these games, which has dampened their morale. A notable characteristic of the team is their weakness on the road. This season, they've won very few away games. Their away defense has many flaws, with a high average number of goals conceded per game. Tactically, when playing away, they usually adopt a low - block 5 - 4 - 1 defensive formation, willingly giving up ball - possession and relying on long passes to find counter - attack opportunities. IAHNOR D1
Rosenborg BK
4-0 Fredrikstad
NOR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post