Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
VIAMOND💎Won 5/5Follow77.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
SILENCE🌓XS✨Won 4/5Follow76.9%Win Rate +47.7%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
CHRISPUSFollow76.9%Win Rate +44.4%ROI 13Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
4
Freeman55Won 8/8Follow76.5%Win Rate +36%ROI 17Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
VIP100%Follow75%Win Rate +36%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Football XWon 5/6Follow75%Win Rate +23.7%ROI 12Tips 1.96Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Arnaldo MontanerLannæs and Silkeborg have had evenly - matched performances in their recent encounters. One of the teams has maintained an unbeaten record in multiple games recently. Lannæs has been performing well, so they definitely have the motivation for this game. The number of goals conceded reflects the gap in strength between the two teams. Their performance in both attack and defense is not much different from that on the road. Lannæs is a strong team in terms of combat ability. Their attacking end has been quite effective. They have achieved favorable results in three out of their last four games, showing a good recent record in terms of performance data. It's hard to tell which team will seize the initiative in this match. Lannæs has shown a slight upward trend in form compared to their previous game. They've been performing well recently, with stable performances in several matches. Their goal - scoring ability has been quite reliable in recent outings. On the other hand, Silkeborg isO/U
DEN SASL
Randers FC
1-1 Silkeborg IF
-
JJ BEDDINGSLannus shows a stronger offensive threat compared to Silkeborg. Its offensive end conversion rate is 18.7%, better than Silkeborg's 14.2%. The xG efficiency is 1.23 against 0.91. In terms of offensive quality, the value of front - field passes is 12.4 for Lannus and 9.8 for Silkeborg. The key pass success rate is 62% vs 48%, indicating that Lannus has an edge in ball - control quality. In the midfield, Lannus has 15 interceptions while Silkeborg has 9. The transition speed of Lannus is 23% higher. The running distance is 112 km for Lannus and 107 km for Silkeborg, with 12 more high - intensity sprints, suggesting better physical reserves. On the defensive side, Lannus has 11 clearances compared to Silkeborg's 7, and 18 tackles against 12, showing a more stable defense. Regarding offensive efficiency, Lannus' shot - on - target rate is 61% compared to 49% of Silkeborg. The scoring opportunity conversion rate is 28% vs 19%, highlighting its better ability to seize opportunities. The totaO/UDEN SASL
Randers FC
1-1 Silkeborg IF
-
Every Movie Plug Won 3/4Lannæs is facing a setback with central defender Jones out due to a knee injury. This forces the team to use a substitute defense line, which lacks coordination and understanding. When the full - backs push forward aggressively, there are gaps left for the opponents to counter - attack. However, Lannæs has a decent home - field dominance. Against opponents with a weakened defense, they can consistently create shooting opportunities, as evidenced by their large - margin victories in pre - season friendlies. Silkeborg is suffering a serious problem of player losses. Two key central defenders, Löding and Busch, are out injured simultaneously. As a result, the entire central defense has to rely on substitutes. Their ability in frontal tackles and aerial duels has declined significantly, and they concede a high number of goals on average in away games. In their last nine matches, they have only achieved a clean sheet once. The defense has a very low margin for error, and even if the attaAHDEN SASL
Randers FC
1-1 Silkeborg IF
DEN SASL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post