Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
GoalwireHQWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
LACOBRAAAFollow78.6%Win Rate +42.6%ROI 15Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
The french ladFollow75%Win Rate +49.6%ROI 16Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
4
ConstanceWon 5/6Follow75%Win Rate +18.8%ROI 12Tips 1.57Avg Odds -
5
Emile Smith RoweFollow74.1%Win Rate +32.3%ROI 27Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
AbuleWon 5/6Follow73.7%Win Rate +16.5%ROI 19Tips 1.62Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Pi314Trenčín Spartak shows better offensive efficiency compared to CSKA Sofia 1948. Their full - field offensive conversion rate is 28%, while CSKA Sofia 1948's is only 19%. The xG efficiency of 1.28 against 0.72 indicates that Trenčín Spartak poses a greater offensive threat. In terms of passing, Trenčín Spartak has a key passing success rate of 61%, leading CSKA Sofia 1948's 53%. The value of forward - field passes is 14.3 times per 90 minutes, outperforming the opponent's 11.8 times. Regarding midfield control, Trenčín Spartak holds a 62% control rate, better than CSKA Sofia 1948's 48%. The average transition speed is 1.8 seconds per time, faster than the opponent's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total team running distance is 112.3 kilometers, more than CSKA Sofia 1948's 107.4 kilometers. The number of high - intensity sprints is 47, leading the opponent's 32. Join me to stay updated on more insightful analyses. The defensive performance of Spartak Trnava isAH
UEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
IqtidarTerňa SPP currently sits in the lower reaches of the league, facing a grim relegation situation. This has fueled their strong desire to grab points and survive. Recently, their form has been consistently poor. In the last ten league games, they've managed only 2 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses, resulting in a relatively low win - rate. Their home - ground defense has numerous holes, and they've conceded goals frequently. The team's main lineup is largely intact, with no key players out due to injury or suspension. The players are in good physical condition, but they lack experience in handling high - pressure games. The squad depth is thin, and they struggle to rotate players in tough matches, making it difficult to adapt to the high - intensity and consecutive games in the UEFA Europa Conference League. At home, the team adopts an active attacking style, pressing high up the pitch to look for goal - scoring opportunities. However, there are obvious flaws in their attack - defense transitAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
Liam 665 Won 4/5Trenčín Spartak shows better performance in various aspects compared to CSKA Sofia 1948. In terms of offensive efficiency, Trenčín Spartak has an overall offensive conversion rate of 18%, which is superior to CSKA Sofia 1948's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 indicates that Trenčín Spartak is more productive in the offensive end. Regarding passing, Trenčín Spartak has a key - pass success rate of 62%, leading CSKA Sofia 1948's 48%. The value of forward passes, 1.32 to 0.89, suggests that Trenčín Spartak's attacks are more threatening. In midfield control, Trenčín Spartak holds a 58% possession rate compared to CSKA Sofia 1948's 42%, which helps maintain a better passing rhythm. The average transition speed of 1.8 seconds is faster than the opponent's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Trenčín Spartak reaches 112 km, higher than CSKA Sofia 1948's 98 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 23 to 15, shows their physical adAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
UEFA ECL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post